{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,17]],"date-time":"2026-02-17T13:08:47Z","timestamp":1771333727723,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002712","name":"H\u00f8gskolen i Oslo og Akershus","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002712","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,12]]},"DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1647-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,5]],"date-time":"2018-01-05T08:19:16Z","timestamp":1515140356000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"Kjersti Engen","family":"Marsdal","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Ingvil Krarup","family":"S\u00f8rbye","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Lise C.","family":"Gaudernack","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Mirjam","family":"Lukasse","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"1647_CR1","unstructured":"European perinatal health report: Health and Care of Pregnant Women and Babies in Europe in 2010. Euro-Peristat. \nhttp:\/\/www.europeristat.com\/reports\/european-perinatal-health-report-2010.html\n\n. Accessed 03 Sept 2016."},{"issue":"1","key":"1647_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12809","volume":"95","author":"M D\u00f6gl","year":"2016","unstructured":"D\u00f6gl M, Vanky E, Heimstad R. Changes in induction methods have not influenced cesarean section rates among women with induced labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(1):112\u20135.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"3 Pt 1","key":"1647_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70265-6","volume":"180","author":"JD Yeast","year":"1999","unstructured":"Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(3 Pt 1):628\u201333.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1647_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000157436.68847.3b","volume":"105","author":"A Vahratian","year":"2005","unstructured":"Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(4):698\u2013704.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1647_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"290","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.07.032","volume":"207","author":"RD Stewart","year":"2012","unstructured":"Stewart RD, Bleich AT, Lo JY, Alexander JM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Defining uterine tachysystole: how much is too much? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(4):290\u20136.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1647_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.217","volume":"188","author":"T Kol\u00e5s","year":"2003","unstructured":"Kol\u00e5s T, Hofoss D, Daltveit AK, Nilsen ST, Henriksen T, H\u00e4ger R, Ingemarsson I, \u00d8ian P. Indications for cesarean deliveries in Norway. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(4):864\u201370.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1647_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hofmeyr GJ, G\u00fclmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;10","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000941.pub2"},{"key":"1647_CR8","unstructured":"Misodel Summary of Product Characteristics. \nhttps:\/\/www.ferring.com\/en\/media\/press-releases\/2013\/misodel-17oct13\/\n\n. Accessed 01 Oct 2016."},{"key":"1647_CR9","unstructured":"Heads of Medicines Agencies. Misoprostol gynaecological indication PSUR SAR. 2015. \nhttp:\/\/www.hma.eu\/search.html?id=6&q=misodel&L=0\n\n. Accessed 28 Sept 2016."},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"1647_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31829a2dd6","volume":"122","author":"DA Wing","year":"2013","unstructured":"Wing DA, Brown R, Plante LA, Miller H, Rugarn O, Powers BL. Misoprostol vaginal insert and time to vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(2 Pt 1):201\u20139.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1647_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.008","volume":"200","author":"RB Mayer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mayer RB, Oppelt P, Shebl O, P\u00f6mer J, Allerstorfer C, Weiss C. Initial clinical experience with a misoprostol vaginal insert in comparison with a dinoprostone insert for inducing labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;200:89\u201393.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"1647_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dobert M, Brandstetter A, Henrich W, Rawnaq T, Hasselbeck H, Dobert TF, Hinkson L, Schwaerzler P. The misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol for labor induction in term pregnancies: a pair-matched case-control study. J of. Perinat Med. 2017;","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2017-0049"},{"issue":"6","key":"1647_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.5603\/GP.a2017.0060","volume":"88","author":"T Gornisiewicz","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gornisiewicz T, Jaworowski A, Zembala-Szczerba M, Babczyk D, Huras H. Analysis of intravaginal misoprostol 0.2 mg versus intracervical dinoprostone 0.5 mg doses for labor induction at term pregnancies. Ginekologia pol. 2017;88(6):320\u20134.","journal-title":"Ginekologia pol"},{"key":"1647_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.04.026","volume":"131","author":"M Robson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Robson M, Murphy M, Byrne F. Quality assurance: the 10-group classification system (Robson classification), induction of labor, and cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131:23\u20137.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"1647_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181ad9377","volume":"114","author":"L Pevzner","year":"2009","unstructured":"Pevzner L, Rayburn WF, Rumney P, Wing DA. Factors predicting successful labor induction with dinoprostone and misoprostol vaginal inserts. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(2 Pt 1):261\u20137.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"1647_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1237","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.123740","volume":"186","author":"DA Wing","year":"2002","unstructured":"Wing DA, Tran S, Paul RH. Factors affecting the likelihood of successful induction after intravaginal misoprostol application for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1237\u201340.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1647_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050410001702195","volume":"15","author":"JMG Crane","year":"2004","unstructured":"Crane JMG, Delaney T, Butt KD, Bennett KA, Hutchens D, Young DC. Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol. J Matern Fetal Med. 2004;15(5):319\u201323.","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Med."},{"issue":"3","key":"1647_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.01.005","volume":"129","author":"W Chen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Chen W, Xue J, Gaudet L, Walker M, Wen SW. Meta-analysis of Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;129(3):193\u20138.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"1647_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000278","volume":"124","author":"SK Laughon","year":"2014","unstructured":"Laughon SK, Berghella V, Reddy UM, Sundaram R, Lu Z, Hoffman MK. Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(1):57\u201367.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1647_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610120101637","volume":"22","author":"J Maghoma","year":"2002","unstructured":"Maghoma J, Buchmann EJ. Maternal and fetal risks associated with prolonged latent phase of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;22(1):16\u20139.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1647_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318209d669","volume":"117","author":"DA Wing","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wing DA, Miller H, Parker L, Powers BL, Rayburn WF. Misoprostol vaginal insert for successful labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(3):533\u201341.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1647_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00496.x","volume":"112","author":"S Gregson","year":"2005","unstructured":"Gregson S, Waterstone M, Norman I, Murrells TA. Randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term. BJOG. 2005;112(4):438\u201344.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"10","key":"1647_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1279","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01829.x","volume":"115","author":"AA Calder","year":"2008","unstructured":"Calder AA, Loughney AD, Weir CJ, Barber JW. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone. BJOG. 2008;115(10):1279\u201388.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"1647_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1155","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70610-1","volume":"180","author":"DA Wing","year":"1999","unstructured":"Wing DA, Ham D, Paul RHA. Comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(5):1155\u201360.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1647_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Gemund N, Scherjon S, LeCessie S, van Leeuwen JHS, van Roosmalen J, Kanhai HHH. A Randomised trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for labour induction. BJOG 2004; 111(1):42\u201349.","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.00010.x"},{"key":"1647_CR26","unstructured":"Norwegian Institute of Public Health. Medical Birth Registry of Norway. \nhttp:\/\/statistikk.fhi.no\/mfr\/\n\n. Accessed 18 Oct 2016."},{"key":"1647_CR27","unstructured":"European Medicines Agency. List of nationally authorised medical products Active substance: Misoprostol (gynaecological indication - labour induction). \nhttp:\/\/www.ema.europa.eu\/docs\/en_GB\/document_library\/Periodic_safety_update_single_assessment\/2017\/03\/WC500223582.pdf\n\n. Accessed 02 Jan 2018."},{"key":"1647_CR28","unstructured":"NHS Digital. NHS Maternity Statistics - England, 2013\u201314. \nhttps:\/\/digital.nhs.uk\/catalogue\/PUB16725\n\n. Accessed 19 Oct 2016."},{"issue":"5","key":"1647_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.3109\/14767050903168432","volume":"23","author":"LH Kim","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kim LH, Cheng YW, Delaney S, Jelin AC, Caughey ABI. Preeclampsia associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery if labor is induced? J Matern Fetal Med. 2010;23(5):383\u20138.","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"1647_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/S0165-0327(97)00110-9","volume":"49","author":"M Righetti-Veltema","year":"1998","unstructured":"Righetti-Veltema M, Conne-Perr\u00e9ard E, Bousquet A, Manzano J. Risk factors and predictive signs of postpartum depression. J Affect Disord. 1998;49(3):167\u201380.","journal-title":"J Affect Disord"}],"container-title":["BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12884-017-1647-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,5]],"date-time":"2018-01-05T08:19:39Z","timestamp":1515140379000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12884-017-1647-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,5]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1647"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-017-1647-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2393"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2393","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,5]]},"article-number":"11"}}