{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,21]],"date-time":"2022-09-21T05:29:08Z","timestamp":1663738148590},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Letras","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["REDIS"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Contemporary post-truth discourses put the constructivist foundations of Dis-course Studies to a test. According to critical observers, discourse analysts have been playing into the hands of Trump, Brexit and right-wing populists by politicising scientific knowledge and undermining the idea of scientific truth. In order to respond to these concerns, this article outlines  a  Strong  Programme  in  Discourse  Studies.  While  the  Strong  Programme  insists  on  truths as discursive constructions, in no way does it claim that all ideas have the same truth value or that an idea can become true because somebody wants it to be true. The Strong Pro-gramme makes the case for discourse research that is constructivist (it asks how truths are con-structed practically) without being relativist (all ideas do not have the same normative quality). Taking  inspiration  from  debates  in  Science  and  Technology  Studies  of  the  1970s,  the  Strong  Programme  formulates  principles  for  discourse  researchers  dealing  with  conflicting  truth  claims.  Discourse  analytical  explanations  of  truths  of  first-order  participants  and  of  second-order observers should be symmetrical, heterogeneous, multi-perspectival and reflexive. The Strong Programme discourse research is grounded in the founding traditions of \u201cFrench\u201d and \u201cCritical\u201d Discourse Studies, which have struggled over questions of truth and reality since the beginning. While critically interrogating the structuralist heritage of these strands, the Strong Programme insists on the practices of making and unmaking ideas through language use no matter  whether  they  appear  as  true  or  false  to  participants  and  observers.  Discourse  Studies  are encouraged to critically reflect on how hierarchies between  knowledges are not only repre-sented but, through their representation, also constituted through discursive practices.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.21747\/21833958\/red7a2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,12]],"date-time":"2019-03-12T16:01:30Z","timestamp":1552406490000},"page":"36-62","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["A verdade na era da p\u00f3s-verdade: por um Programa Forte em Estudos do discurso"],"prefix":"10.21747","volume":"7","author":[{"given":"Johannes","family":"Angermuller","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"9208","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018]]},"container-title":["REDIS: REVISTA DE ESTUDOS DO DISCURSO"],"original-title":["Truth after post-truth: for a Strong Programme in Discourse Studies"],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,20]],"date-time":"2022-09-20T09:07:21Z","timestamp":1663664841000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/ojs.letras.up.pt\/index.php\/re\/article\/view\/6198\/5833"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018]]},"references-count":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21747\/21833958\/red7a2","relation":{},"ISSN":["2183-3958"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2183-3958","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018]]}}}