{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,20]],"date-time":"2026-01-20T08:02:30Z","timestamp":1768896150227,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Ophthalmol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2003,4,1]]},"DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.121.4.458","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2003,4,15]],"date-time":"2003-04-15T02:09:03Z","timestamp":1050372543000},"page":"458","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":35,"title":["Increased Detection Rate of Glaucomatous Visual Field Damage With Locally Condensed Grids"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"121","author":[{"given":"Ulrich","family":"Schiefer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"10","container-title":["Archives of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamaophthalmology\/fullarticle\/415224","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,17]],"date-time":"2016-12-17T05:56:04Z","timestamp":1481954164000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/archopht.jamanetwork.com\/article.aspx?doi=10.1001\/archopht.121.4.458"}},"subtitle":["A Comparison Between Fundus-Oriented Perimetry and Conventional Visual Field Examination"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2003,4,1]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2003,4,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/archopht.121.4.458","relation":{},"ISSN":["0003-9950"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0003-9950","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2003,4,1]]}}}