{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T14:04:40Z","timestamp":1786975480204,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"12","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Ophthalmol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,1]]},"DOI":"10.1001\/archophthalmol.2012.2853","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,10]],"date-time":"2012-12-10T18:44:34Z","timestamp":1355165074000},"page":"1525","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":49,"title":["A Randomized Trial Comparing the Cost-effectiveness of 2 Approaches for Treating Unilateral Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"130","member":"10","container-title":["Archives of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamaophthalmology\/fullarticle\/1484688","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,17]],"date-time":"2016-12-17T00:56:55Z","timestamp":1481936215000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/archopht.jamanetwork.com\/article.aspx?doi=10.1001\/archophthalmol.2012.2853"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,1]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/archophthalmol.2012.2853","relation":{},"ISSN":["0003-9950"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0003-9950","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,1]]}}}