{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,25]],"date-time":"2026-01-25T21:21:05Z","timestamp":1769376065547,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,23]]},"DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2017.21268","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,23]],"date-time":"2018-01-23T17:31:14Z","timestamp":1516728674000},"page":"347","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Evaluating the Long-term Safety of Hysteroscopic Sterilization"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"319","author":[{"given":"Eve","family":"Espey","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lisa G.","family":"Hofler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"10","reference":[{"issue":"9","key":"jed170124r1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsa1506575","article-title":"Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008\u20132011.","volume":"374","author":"Finer","year":"2016","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"jed170124r3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.10.003","article-title":"Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012, and 2014.","volume":"97","author":"Kavanaugh","year":"2018","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"1","key":"jed170124r6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002376","article-title":"Interval female sterilization.","volume":"131","author":"Stuart","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"jed170124r8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i1283","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i1283","article-title":"US to require safety warnings for Essure sterilization device.","volume":"352","author":"McCarthy","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"jed170124r11","article-title":"Association of hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization with procedural, gynecological, and medical outcomes.","author":"Bouillon","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"5","key":"jed170124r12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"570.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011","article-title":"The feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization.","volume":"217","author":"Antoun","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"jed170124r13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001615","article-title":"Gynecologic outcomes after hysteroscopic and laparoscopic sterilization procedures.","volume":"128","author":"Perkins","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"12","key":"jed170124r14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1851","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14719","article-title":"Safety and effectiveness of female tubal sterilisation by hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, or laparotomy: a register based study.","volume":"124","author":"Jokinen","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"jed170124r15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"h5162","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h5162","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: an observational cohort study.","volume":"351","author":"Mao","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"jed170124r16","first-page":"59","article-title":"Microinsert nonincisional hysteroscopic sterilization.","volume":"102","author":"Cooper","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"jed170124r17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01354.x","article-title":"Success rate and patient satisfaction with the Essure sterilisation in an outpatient setting: a prospective study of 857 women.","volume":"114","author":"Mi\u00f1o","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"jed170124r18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(99)00121-3","article-title":"The \u201cboom and bust phenomenon\u201d: the hopes, dreams, and broken promises of the contraceptive revolution.","volume":"61","author":"Boonstra","year":"2000","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"jed170124r19","first-page":"137","article-title":"Temporal trend in the use of hysteroscopic vs laparoscopic sterilization and the characteristics of commercially insured and Medicaid-insured females in the US who have had the procedures.","volume":"8","author":"Carney","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Womens Health"},{"issue":"6","key":"jed170124r21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"951","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2015.04.017","article-title":"Hysteroscopic Essure inserts for permanent contraception: extended follow-up results of a Phase III multicenter international study.","volume":"22","author":"Chudnoff","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"jed170124r20","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Review of the Essure System for Hysteroscopic Sterilization","year":"2015"},{"key":"jed170124r2","unstructured":"HealthyPeople.gov. Healthy People 2020. Family planning objectives. https:\/\/www.healthypeople.gov\/2020\/topics-objectives\/topic\/family-planning\/objectives. Accessed December 9, 2017."},{"key":"jed170124r4","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Effectiveness of family planning methods. https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/reproductivehealth\/contraception\/index.htm. Accessed December21, 2017."},{"key":"jed170124r5","unstructured":"DanielsK, DaughertyJ, JonesJ. Current contraceptive use among women aged 15-44: United Stated, 2011-2013. NCHS Data Brief No 173, December 2014. https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/nchs\/data\/databriefs\/db173.pdf. Accessed December 21, 2017."},{"key":"jed170124r7","unstructured":"US Food and Drug Administration. FDA activity: Essure. https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/MedicalDevices\/ProductsandMedicalProcedures\/ImplantsandProsthetics\/EssurePermanentBirthControl\/ucm452254.htm. Accessed December 21, 2017."},{"key":"jed170124r9","unstructured":"Essure procedure petition. http:\/\/essureprocedure.net\/petition. Accessed December 21, 2017."},{"key":"jed170124r10","unstructured":"Bayer to end non-US sales of Essure, a contested sterilisation implant. https:\/\/medicalxpress.com\/news\/2017-09-bayer-non-us-sales-essure-contested.html Published Septmeber 18, 2017. Accessed December 21, 2017."},{"key":"jed170124r22","unstructured":"The battle over Essure. Washington Post; July 26, 2017. http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/sf\/style\/2017\/07\/26\/essure\/?utm_term=.173e322330ad. Accessed December 21, 2017."},{"key":"jed170124r23","unstructured":"522 Postmarket surveillance studies: Essure\u2014P020014. 2016. https:\/\/www.accessdata.fda.gov\/scripts\/cdrh\/cfdocs\/cfPMA\/pss.cfm?t_id=356&c_id=3854. Accessed December 20, 2017."}],"container-title":["JAMA"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/\/jama\/article-pdf\/319\/4\/347\/17503208\/jama_espey_2018_ed_170124.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,26]],"date-time":"2020-10-26T00:52:53Z","timestamp":1603673573000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/jama.jamanetwork.com\/article.aspx?doi=10.1001\/jama.2017.21268"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,23]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,23]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2017.21268","relation":{},"ISSN":["0098-7484"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0098-7484","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,23]]}}}