{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T00:59:26Z","timestamp":1791939566616,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"14","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,11]]},"abstract":"\n Importance<\/jats:title>\n Vacuum aspiration is commonly used to remove retained products of conception in patients with incomplete spontaneous abortion. Scarring of the uterine cavity may occur, potentially impairing future fertility. A procedural alternative, operative hysteroscopy, has gained popularity with a presumption of better future fertility.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Objective<\/jats:title>\n To assess the superiority of hysteroscopy to vacuum aspiration for subsequent pregnancy in patients with incomplete spontaneous abortion who intend to have future pregnancy.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Design, Setting, and Participants<\/jats:title>\n The HY-PER randomized, controlled, single-blind trial included 574 patients between November 6, 2014, and May 3, 2017, with a 2-year duration of follow-up. This multicenter trial recruited patients in 15 French hospitals. Individuals aged 18 to 44 years and planned for surgery for an incomplete spontaneous abortion with plans to subsequently conceive were randomized in a 1:1 ratio.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Interventions<\/jats:title>\n Surgical treatment by hysteroscopy (n\u2009=\u2009288) or vacuum aspiration (n\u2009=\u2009286).<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Main Outcomes and Measures<\/jats:title>\n The primary outcome was a pregnancy of at least 22 weeks\u2019 duration during 2-year follow-up.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n \n The intention-to-treat analyses included 563 women (mean [SD] age, 32.6 [5.4] years). All aspiration procedures were completed. The hysteroscopic procedure could not be completed for 19 patients (7%), 18 of which were converted to vacuum aspiration (8 with inability to completely resect, 7 with insufficient visualization, 2 with anesthetic complications that required a shortened procedure, 1 with equipment failure). One hysteroscopy failed due to a false passage during cervical dilatation. During the 2-year follow-up, 177 patients (62.8%) in the hysteroscopy group and 190 (67.6%) in the vacuum aspiration (control) group achieved the primary outcome (difference, \u22124.8% [95% CI, \u221213% to 3.0%];\n P<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009=\u2009.23). The time-to-event analyses showed no statistically significant difference between groups for the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.71 to 1.07]). Duration of surgery and hospitalization were significantly longer for hysteroscopy. Rates of new miscarriages, ectopic pregnancies, Clavien-Dindo surgical complications of grade 3 or above (requiring surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention or life-threatening event or death), and reinterventions to remove remaining products of conception did not differ between groups.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions and Relevance<\/jats:title>\n Surgical management by hysteroscopy of incomplete spontaneous abortions in patients intending to conceive again was not associated with more subsequent births or a better safety profile than vacuum aspiration. Moreover, operative hysteroscopy was not feasible in all cases.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Trial Registration<\/jats:title>\n \n ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:\n NCT02201732<\/jats:ext-link>\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2023.3415","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,11]],"date-time":"2023-04-11T11:04:37Z","timestamp":1681211077000},"page":"1197","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":31,"title":["Operative Hysteroscopy vs Vacuum Aspiration for Incomplete Spontaneous Abortion"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"329","author":[{"given":"Cyrille","family":"Huchon","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, APHP, Hopital Lariboisi\u00e8re, University of Paris Cit\u00e9, Paris, France"},{"name":"Universit\u00e9 Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Unit\u00e9 de Recherche 7285, Risques Cliniques et S\u00e9curit\u00e9 en Sant\u00e9 des Femmes et en Sant\u00e9 P\u00e9rinatale (RISCQ), Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France"},{"name":"Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, CHI Poissy-St-Germain, Poissy CEDEX, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hocine","family":"Drioueche","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Clinical Research, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Martin","family":"Koskas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universit\u00e9 Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Unit\u00e9 de Recherche 7285, Risques Cliniques et S\u00e9curit\u00e9 en Sant\u00e9 des Femmes et en Sant\u00e9 P\u00e9rinatale (RISCQ), Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France"},{"name":"Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, APHP, H\u00f4pital Bichat, Paris, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aubert","family":"Agostini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, H\u00f4pital La Conception, Marseille CEDEX 5, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Estelle","family":"Bauville","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes CEDEX 2, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nicolas","family":"Bourdel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynecologic Surgery, CHU Estaing Clermont Ferrand, 63058 Clermont Ferrand CEDEX 1, Faculty of Medicine, ISIT \u2013 Universit\u00e9 d\u2019Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Herv\u00e9","family":"Fernandez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, AP-HP, H\u00f4pital Bic\u00eatre, Le Kremlin Bic\u00eatre, 94270, France"},{"name":"Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health-INSERM U1018, Universit\u00e9 Paris Sud, Le Kremlin Bic\u00eatre, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xavier","family":"Fritel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, CHU de Poitiers, Universit\u00e9 de Poitiers, Facult\u00e9 de M\u00e9decine et Pharmacie, Inserm CIC1402, Poitiers, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Olivier","family":"Graesslin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, H\u00f4pital Alix de Champagne, CHU de Reims, Reims, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Guillaume","family":"Legendre","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, CHU d\u2019Angers, Angers CEDEX 01, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jean-Philippe","family":"Lucot","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, H\u00f4pital Jeanne-de-Flandre, CHRU de Lille, Lille, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pierre","family":"Panel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Le Chesnay, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cyril","family":"Raiffort","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, APHP, H\u00f4pital Louis Mourier, D\u00e9partement Hospitalier Universitaire Risque et Grossesse, Colombes, University of Paris Cit\u00e9, Paris, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"G\u00e9raldine","family":"Giraudet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, H\u00f4pital Jeanne-de-Flandre, CHRU de Lille, Lille, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Laurence","family":"Bussi\u00e8res","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Clinical Unit Research\/Clinic Investigation Center, Paris Descartes, H\u00f4pital Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-H\u00f4pitaux de Paris, Paris, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arnaud","family":"Fauconnier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universit\u00e9 Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Unit\u00e9 de Recherche 7285, Risques Cliniques et S\u00e9curit\u00e9 en Sant\u00e9 des Femmes et en Sant\u00e9 P\u00e9rinatale (RISCQ), Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France"},{"name":"Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, CHI Poissy-St-Germain, Poissy CEDEX, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10","reference":[{"issue":"10285","key":"joi230030r1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1658","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(21)00682-6","article-title":"Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss.","volume":"397","author":"Quenby","year":"2021","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"joi230030r2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"b3827","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b3827","article-title":"Incidence of pregnancy after expectant, medical, or surgical management of spontaneous first trimester miscarriage: long term follow-up of miscarriage treatment (MIST) randomised controlled trial.","volume":"339","author":"Smith","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"7298","key":"joi230030r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1343","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.322.7298.1343","article-title":"Management of spontaneous miscarriage in the first trimester: an example of putting informed shared decision making into practice.","volume":"322","author":"Ankum","year":"2001","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"joi230030r4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"l6283","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l6283","article-title":"Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: diagnosis and initial management: summary of updated NICE guidance.","volume":"367","author":"Webster","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"6","key":"joi230030r5","article-title":"Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis.","volume":"6","author":"Ghosh","year":"2021","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"joi230030r6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.09.021","article-title":"Long-term complications and reproductive outcome after the management of retained products of conception: a systematic review.","volume":"105","author":"Hooker","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"4","key":"joi230030r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2009.04.011","article-title":"Hysteroscopic management of residual trophoblastic tissue and reproductive outcome: a pilot study.","volume":"16","author":"Faivre","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"joi230030r8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.09.001","article-title":"Operative hysteroscopy to remove retained products of conception: novel treatment of an old problem.","volume":"18","author":"Golan","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"joi230030r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.02.003","article-title":"Evaluation of fertility after operative hysteroscopy to remove retained products of conception.","volume":"211","author":"Sonnier","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"joi230030r10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(05)60577-4","article-title":"Hysteroscopy may be the method of choice for management of residual trophoblastic tissue.","volume":"8","author":"Cohen","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc"},{"issue":"1","key":"joi230030r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2014.05.003","article-title":"A comparison of reproductive outcomes following hysteroscopic management versus dilatation and curettage of retained products of conception.","volume":"127","author":"Ben-Ami","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"6","key":"joi230030r12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"774","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.08.003","article-title":"Hysteroscopic management of residual trophoblastic tissue is superior to ultrasound-guided curettage.","volume":"18","author":"Rein","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"joi230030r13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2020.10.028","article-title":"Surgical and reproductive outcomes after hysteroscopic removal of retained products of conception: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"28","author":"Vitale","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"joi230030r14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.11.020","article-title":"Hysteroscopic management of retained products of conception: meta-analysis and literature review.","volume":"173","author":"Smorgick","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"joi230030r15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.31887\/DCNS.2011.13.2\/npatsopoulos","article-title":"A pragmatic view on pragmatic trials.","volume":"13","author":"Patsopoulos","year":"2011","journal-title":"Dialogues Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"joi230030r16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-015-0900-1","article-title":"Operative hysteroscopy versus vacuum aspiration for incomplete spontaneous abortion (HY-PER): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.","volume":"16","author":"Huchon","year":"2015","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"joi230030r17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.02.015","article-title":"Pregnancy loss: French clinical practice guidelines.","volume":"201","author":"Huchon","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"5","key":"joi230030r18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"912","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004132","article-title":"A framework proposal for quality and safety measurement in gynecologic emergency care.","volume":"136","author":"Fauconnier","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"joi230030r19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2008.12.003","article-title":"A score-based method to improve the quality of emergency gynaecological ultrasound examination.","volume":"143","author":"Salomon","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"joi230030r20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2","article-title":"The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.","volume":"250","author":"Clavien","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"joi230030r21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.2307\/2530613","article-title":"An improved approximate formula for calculating sample sizes for comparing two binomial distributions.","volume":"34","author":"Casagrande","year":"1978","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"issue":"9307","key":"joi230030r22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"696","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(02)07816-9","article-title":"Blinding in randomised trials: hiding who got what.","volume":"359","author":"Schulz","year":"2002","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"7172","key":"joi230030r23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1572","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.317.7172.1572","article-title":"Survival probabilities (the Kaplan-Meier method).","volume":"317","author":"Bland","year":"1998","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"5","key":"joi230030r24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.02.113","article-title":"Prevalence of intrauterine adhesions after the application of hyaluronic acid gel after dilatation and curettage in women with at least one previous curettage: short-term outcomes of a multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial.","volume":"107","author":"Hooker","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"20","key":"joi230030r25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1895","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1806395","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.","volume":"379","author":"Ramirez","year":"2018","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"}],"container-title":["JAMA"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jama\/articlepdf\/2803517\/jama_huchon_2023_oi_230030_1695226260.0946.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,26]],"date-time":"2023-09-26T11:01:56Z","timestamp":1695726116000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jama\/fullarticle\/2803517"}},"subtitle":["A Randomized Clinical Trial"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,11]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"14","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,11]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2023.3415","relation":{},"ISSN":["0098-7484"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0098-7484","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,11]]}}}