{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T20:11:02Z","timestamp":1790712662555,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,1]],"date-time":"2019-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1556668800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["JAMA Facial Plast Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Importance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Periorbital sequelae are a significant source of early postoperative morbidity after rhinoplasty, particularly after an osteotomy is performed.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare postoperative periorbital sequelae after external perforating lateral osteotomy in rhinoplasty using a periosteal sweeping vs a periosteal preserving approach.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This prospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary referral center located in Mansoura, Egypt, included 28 patients who underwent external perforating lateral osteotomy in open rhinoplasty between January and May 2017.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Exposures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Periosteal sweeping was performed on one side of the nose and periosteal preservation was performed on the other side during external perforating lateral osteotomy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Main Outcomes and Measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Periorbital sequelae, including eyelid edema, periorbital ecchymosis, and subconjunctival hemorrhage, were assessed on both sides of the face on postoperative days 1, 7, and 21 by 2 independent surgeons using the scale first proposed by Kara and G\u00f6kalan in 1999. The scales for eyelid edema ranged from 0 to 4, for ecchymosis from 0 to 4, and for subconjunctival hemorrhage from 0 to 2, with higher values indicating greater edema, ecchymosis, and hemorrhage, respectively. Differences in the 3 time points and differences between the 2 osteotomy methods were analyzed.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      In total, 19 men and 9 women with a mean (SD) age of 23.7 (3.9) years were enrolled. All patients showed significant decreases in eyelid edema on postoperative days 7 and 21 compared with day 1 (1.71 and 1.39 vs 2.89 for the swept side, and 1.86 and 1.46 vs 2.68 for the preserved side; both\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u2009.05) and in periorbital ecchymosis (2.02 and 1.13 vs 2.86 for swept side, and 2.05 and 1.13 vs 2.82 for the preserved side; both\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u2009.05). A significant decrease in subconjunctival hemorrhage was observed on day 21 compared with days 1 and 7 (1.79 vs 2.11 and 2.11 for the swept side, and 1.71 vs 2.14 and 2.14 for the preserved side; both\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u2009.05). The mean rank score for eyelid edema on day 1 for the swept side was significantly higher than that for the preserved side (33.18 vs 23.82,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u2009.02), and the mean rank score for periorbital ecchymosis on the swept side was significantly higher than that for the preserved side (33.59 vs 23.41,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u2009.01). Although both eyelid edema and periorbital ecchymosis appeared to remain greater on the swept side on postoperative days 7 and 21, the differences no longer reached statistical significance. Periosteal preservation was not associated with minimizing subconjunctival hemorrhage postoperatively.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study suggests that lateral nasal osteotomy is associated with varying degrees of eyelid edema, periorbital ecchymosis, and subconjunctival hemorrhage. Compared with sweeping the periosteum, preserving the periosteum in an external perforating lateral osteotomy was associated with less eyelid edema and periorbital ecchymosis in the early postoperative period.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Level of Evidence<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamafacialplasticsurgery\/pages\/instructions-for-authors\/#SecLevelofEvidence\/Ethnicity\">2<\/jats:ext-link>\n                      .\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1001\/jamafacial.2018.1730","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,21]],"date-time":"2019-02-21T16:07:41Z","timestamp":1550765261000},"page":"185-190","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Association of Periosteal Sweeping vs Periosteal Preservation With Early Periorbital Sequelae Among Patients Undergoing External Perforating Osteotomy During Rhinoplasty"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"21","author":[{"given":"Hossam","family":"El-Sisi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Otolaryngology\u2013Head &amp; Neck Surgery, Mansoura University Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mohamed","family":"Abdelwahab","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Otolaryngology\u2013Head &amp; Neck Surgery, Mansoura University Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt"},{"name":"Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology\u2013Head &amp; Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sam P.","family":"Most","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology\u2013Head &amp; Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California"},{"name":"Associate Editor, JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_1_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006534-200004050-00031"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.PRS.0000113031.67600.B9"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_3_1_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fsc.2004.06.004","article-title":"A modern approach to nasal osteotomies","volume":"13","author":"Most SP","year":"2005","unstructured":"Most SP, , Murakami CS. A modern approach to nasal osteotomies. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2005; 13(1):85-92. 15519930","journal-title":"Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am"},{"issue":"12","key":"e_1_3_1_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2013.07.028","article-title":"Osteotomy of the nasal wall using a newly designed piezo scalpel\u2014a cadaver study","volume":"71","author":"Ghassemi A","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ghassemi A, , Prescher A, , Talebzadeh M, , H\u00f6lzle F, , Modabber A. Osteotomy of the nasal wall using a newly designed piezo scalpel\u2014a cadaver study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 71(12):2155.e1-2155.e6. 24075234","journal-title":"J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_3_1_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/S1071-0949(05)80012-5","article-title":"Aesthetic and technical aspects of nasal osteotomies","volume":"2","author":"Gruber RP","year":"1995","unstructured":"Gruber RP. Aesthetic and technical aspects of nasal osteotomies. Operative Techniques Plast Reconstr Surg., 1995; 2(1):2-15.","journal-title":"Operative Techniques Plast Reconstr Surg."},{"issue":"9","key":"e_1_3_1_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"990","DOI":"10.1001\/archotol.1991.01870210062009","article-title":"Steroids and rhinoplasty: a double-blind study","volume":"117","author":"Hoffmann DF","year":"1991","unstructured":"Hoffmann DF, , Cook TA, , Quatela VC, , Wang TD, , Brownrigg PJ, , Brummett RE. Steroids and rhinoplasty: a double-blind study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991; 117(9):990-993. 1910730","journal-title":"Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006534-199912000-00043"},{"issue":"3","key":"e_1_3_1_9_2","first-page":"166","article-title":"Subconjunctival ecchymosis due to rhinoplasty","volume":"39","author":"Kara CO","year":"2001","unstructured":"Kara CO, , Kara IG, , Yaylali V. Subconjunctival ecchymosis due to rhinoplasty. Rhinology. 2001; 39(3):166-168. 11721509","journal-title":"Rhinology"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006534-200112000-00051"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2008.05.047"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2005.04.008"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.PRS.0000061005.27994.E3"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_3_1_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1016\/j.coms.2011.10.005","article-title":"Dorsal hump surgery and lateral osteotomy","volume":"24","author":"Bohluli B","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bohluli B, , Moharamnejad N, , Bayat M. Dorsal hump surgery and lateral osteotomy. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2012; 24(1):75-86. 22284398","journal-title":"Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_3_1_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1007\/s12070-007-0002-9","article-title":"External vs. internal osteotomy in rhinoplasty","volume":"59","author":"Sinha V","year":"2007","unstructured":"Sinha V, , Gupta D, , More Y, , Prajapati B, , Kedia BK, , Singh SN. External vs. internal osteotomy in rhinoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007; 59(1):9-12. 23120374","journal-title":"Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_3_1_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0028-1085244","article-title":"Micro-osteotomies in rhinoplasty\u2014a technical refinement","volume":"1","author":"Tardy M","year":"1984","unstructured":"Tardy M, , Denneny J. Micro-osteotomies in rhinoplasty\u2014a technical refinement. Facial Plast Surg. 1984; 1(2):137-145.","journal-title":"Facial Plast Surg"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_17_2","first-page":"169","volume-title":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: Rhinoplasty","author":"Daniel RK","year":"1993","unstructured":"Daniel RK. The osseocartilaginous vault. In: Daniel RK, ed. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: Rhinoplasty. Boston, MA: Little Brown; 1993:169-214."},{"key":"e_1_3_1_18_2","first-page":"595","volume-title":"Dallas Rhinoplasty","author":"Sullivan P","year":"2002","unstructured":"Sullivan P, , Harshbarger R, , Oneal R. Dallas Rhinoplasty. St Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 2002:595-614."},{"key":"e_1_3_1_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamafacial.2017.1083"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1001\/jamafacial.2018.1334","type":"correction","label":"Correction","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,16]],"date-time":"2019-05-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1557964800000}}],"container-title":["JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1001\/jamafacial.2018.1730","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1001\/jamafacial.2018.1730","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1001\/jamafacial.2018.1730","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T06:26:07Z","timestamp":1777443967000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1001\/jamafacial.2018.1730"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,5]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1001\/jamafacial.2018.1730"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamafacial.2018.1730","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-6076","2168-6092"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-6076","type":"print"},{"value":"2168-6092","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,5]]}}}