{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,16]],"date-time":"2026-10-16T03:54:43Z","timestamp":1792122883039,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"9","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA Netw Open"],"abstract":"\n Importance<\/jats:title>\n A textbook outcome (TO) is a composite quality measure that incorporates multiple perioperative events to reflect the most desirable outcome. The use of TO increases the event rate, captures more outcomes to reflect patient experience, and can be used as a benchmark for quality improvement.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Objectives<\/jats:title>\n To introduce the concept of TO to elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), propose the TO criteria, and identify characteristics associated with TO failure.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Design, Setting, and Participants<\/jats:title>\n This retrospective cohort study was performed at 3 surgical units in a single health board in the United Kingdom. Participants included all patients undergoing elective LC between January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2020. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2020.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Main Outcomes and Measures<\/jats:title>\n The TO criteria were defined based on review of existing TO metrics in the literature for other surgical procedures. A TO was defined as an unremarkable elective LC without conversion to open cholecystectomy, subtotal cholecystectomy, intraoperative complication, postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification \u22652), postoperative imaging, postoperative intervention, prolonged length of stay (&gt;2 days), readmission within 100 days, or mortality. The rate of TOs was reported. Reasons for TO failure were reported, and preoperative characteristics were compared between TO and TO failure groups using both univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regressions.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n \n A total of 2166 patients underwent elective LC (median age, 54 [range, 13-92] years; 1579 [72.9%] female). One thousand eight hundred fifty-one patients (85.5%) achieved a TO with an unremarkable perioperative course. Reasons for TO failure (315 patients [14.5%]) included conversion to open procedure (25 [7.9%]), subtotal cholecystectomy (59 [18.7%]), intraoperative complications (40 [12.7%]), postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification \u22652; 92 [29.2%]), postoperative imaging (182 [57.8%]), postoperative intervention (57 [18.1%]), prolonged length of stay (&gt;2 days; 142 [45.1%]), readmission (130 [41.3%]), and mortality (1 [0.3%]). Variables associated with TO failure included increasing American Society of Anesthesiologists score (odds ratio [OR], 2.55 [95 CI, 1.69-3.85];\n P<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009&lt;\u2009.001), increasing number of prior biliary-related admissions (OR, 2.68 [95% CI, 1.36-5.27];\n P<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009=\u2009.004), acute cholecystitis (OR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.08-1.85];\n P<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009=\u2009.01), preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (OR, 2.07 [95% CI, 1.46-2.92];\n P<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009&lt;\u2009.001), and preoperative cholecystostomy (OR, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.54-6.76];\n P<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009=\u2009.002).\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions and Relevance<\/jats:title>\n These findings suggest that applying the concept of TO to elective LC provides a benchmark to identify suboptimal patterns of care and enables institutions to identify strategies for quality improvement.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2022.32171","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,20]],"date-time":"2022-09-20T11:01:56Z","timestamp":1663671716000},"page":"e2232171","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":36,"title":["Evaluation of Textbook Outcome as a Composite Quality Measure of Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"5","author":[{"given":"James","family":"Lucocq","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General and Upper GI Surgery, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John","family":"Scollay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General and Upper GI Surgery, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pradeep","family":"Patil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General and Upper GI Surgery, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,20]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"zoi220922r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aex137","article-title":"Frequency of surgical treatment and related hospital procedures in the UK: a national ecological study using hospital episode statistics.","volume":"119","author":"Abbott","year":"2017","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi220922r4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006231","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.","author":"Keus","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi220922r5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9610(91)90603-B","article-title":"The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.","volume":"161","author":"Cuschieri","year":"1991","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi220922r6","first-page":"215","article-title":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an analysis on 114 005 cases of United States series.","volume":"83","author":"Vecchio","year":"1998","journal-title":"Int Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi220922r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.139.5.476","article-title":"Long-term detrimental effect of bile duct injury on health-related quality of life.","volume":"139","author":"Moore","year":"2004","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi220922r8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e142","DOI":"10.1308\/rcsann.2013.95.8.561","article-title":"Elective day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a formal assessment of the need for outpatient follow-up.","volume":"95","author":"van Boxel","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ann R Coll Surg Engl"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi220922r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1308\/003588410X12664192075053","article-title":"Low ninety-day re-admission rates after emergency and elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a district general hospital.","volume":"92","author":"Down","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ann R Coll Surg Engl"},{"issue":"7","key":"zoi220922r10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"958","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800840714","article-title":"Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.","volume":"84","author":"Mj\u00e5land","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi220922r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1089\/lps.1996.6.73","article-title":"Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy feasibility.","volume":"6","author":"Taylor","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"zoi220922r12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1117","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-002-6264-1","article-title":"Contemporary outcomes of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a major teaching hospital.","volume":"26","author":"Lau","year":"2002","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi220922r13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"742","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.10486","article-title":"Textbook outcome as a composite measure in oesophagogastric cancer surgery.","volume":"104","author":"Busweiler","year":"2017","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi220922r14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1287","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-018-03642-1","article-title":"Textbook outcome: an ordered composite measure for quality of bariatric surgery.","volume":"29","author":"Poelemeijer","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi220922r15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"561","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.10729","article-title":"Using textbook outcome as a measure of quality of care in oesophagogastric cancer surgery.","volume":"105","author":"van der Kaaij","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi220922r17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"446","DOI":"10.1308\/rcsann.2018.0099","article-title":"Current use of procedure specific consent forms for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.","volume":"100","author":"Courtney","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann R Coll Surg Engl"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi220922r18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2012.10.007","article-title":"Focusing on desired outcomes of care after colon cancer resections; hospital variations in \u201ctextbook outcome\u201d.","volume":"39","author":"Kolfschoten","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi220922r19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2011.08.004","article-title":"Consenting practice for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: are we doing enough to warn patients about their operation?","volume":"9","author":"Uzzaman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi220922r20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.135.1.26","article-title":"Hospital informed consent for procedure forms: facilitating quality patient-physician interaction.","volume":"135","author":"Bottrell","year":"2000","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi220922r21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1525-1497.1997.00057.x","article-title":"How doctors and patients discuss routine clinical decisions: informed decision making in the outpatient setting.","volume":"12","author":"Braddock","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi220922r22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1016\/S1553-7250(08)34015-X","article-title":"Reconceptualizing the informed consent process at eight innovative hospitals.","volume":"34","author":"Matiasek","year":"2008","journal-title":"Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf"},{"issue":"10","key":"zoi220922r23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3470","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-020-05625-9","article-title":"Textbook outcomes in liver transplantation.","volume":"44","author":"Moris","year":"2020","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi220922r24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"898","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002388","article-title":"Textbook outcome: a composite measure for quality of elective aneurysm surgery.","volume":"266","author":"Karthaus","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi220922r25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1189","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.v122.6","article-title":"Analysis of textbook outcomes among patients undergoing resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma: a multi-institutional analysis of the US Sarcoma Collaborative.","volume":"122","author":"Wiseman","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi220922r26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2019.0571","article-title":"A multi-institutional international analysis of textbook outcomes among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.","volume":"154","author":"Merath","year":"2019","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi220922r27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-018-6281-2","article-title":"Utilisation of an operative difficulty grading scale for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.","volume":"33","author":"Griffiths","year":"2019","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi220922r28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1116","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000003105","article-title":"Textbook outcomes among Medicare patients undergoing hepatopancreatic surgery.","volume":"271","author":"Merath","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi220922r29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2013.4109","article-title":"Composite measures for profiling hospitals on bariatric surgery performance.","volume":"149","author":"Dimick","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi220922r30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1861","DOI":"10.1111\/hesr.2012.47.issue-5","article-title":"Composite measures for rating hospital quality with major surgery.","volume":"47","author":"Dimick","year":"2012","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"9","key":"zoi220922r31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4115","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-019-07178-y","article-title":"Improving attainment of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.","volume":"34","author":"Nakazato","year":"2020","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi220922r32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002551","article-title":"How good is good? benchmarking and the quest for quality improvement in liver transplantation.","volume":"267","author":"Patel","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi220922r33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2021.2064","article-title":"Assessment of textbook outcome in laparoscopic and open liver surgery.","volume":"156","author":"G\u00f6rgec","year":"2021","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"zoi220922r34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000004916","article-title":"Textbook outcome: definition and analysis of a novel quality measure in lung transplantation.","author":"Halpern","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi220922r35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000003451","article-title":"Textbook outcome: nationwide analysis of a novel quality measure in pancreatic surgery.","volume":"271","author":"van Roessel","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi220922r36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1119","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3182a6f45e","article-title":"The HARM score: a novel, easy measure to evaluate quality and outcomes in colorectal surgery.","volume":"259","author":"Keller","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi220922r37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.21037\/hbsn","article-title":"A systematic review of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and quality of life reporting in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.","volume":"8","author":"Daliya","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr"},{"key":"zoi220922r1","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: interventional procedures guidance. December 17, 2014. Accessed March 30, 2022. https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ipg50"},{"key":"zoi220922r2","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Gallstone disease: diagnosis and management. October 29, 2014. Accessed March 30, 2022. https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/cg188"},{"key":"zoi220922r16","unstructured":"General Medical Council. Decision making and consent. November 9, 2020. Accessed March 30, 2022. https:\/\/www.gmc-uk.org\/ethical-guidance\/ethical-guidance-for-doctors\/decision-making-and-consent"}],"container-title":["JAMA Network Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/articlepdf\/2796542\/lucocq_2022_oi_220922_1663087720.67837.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,20]],"date-time":"2022-09-20T11:02:01Z","timestamp":1663671721000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/fullarticle\/2796542"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,20]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2022.32171","relation":{},"ISSN":["2574-3805"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2574-3805","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,20]]}}}