{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,4]],"date-time":"2026-10-04T10:54:27Z","timestamp":1791111267248,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"7","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA Netw Open"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi240714-4\"><jats:title>Importance<\/jats:title><jats:p>Acute urinary retention (UR) is common, yet variations in diagnosis and management can lead to inappropriate catheterization and harm.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi240714-5\"><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To develop an algorithm for screening and management of UR among adult inpatients.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi240714-6\"><jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants<\/jats:title><jats:p>In this mixed-methods study using the RAND\/UCLA Appropriateness Method and qualitative interviews, an 11-member multidisciplinary expert panel of nurses and physicians from across the US used a formal multi-round process from March to May 2015 to rate 107 clinical scenarios involving diagnosis and management of adult UR in postoperative and medical inpatients. The panel ratings informed the first algorithm draft. Semistructured interviews were conducted from October 2020 to May 2021 with 33 frontline clinicians\u2014nurses and surgeons from 5 Michigan hospitals\u2014to gather feedback and inform algorithm refinements.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi240714-7\"><jats:title>Main Outcomes and Measures<\/jats:title><jats:p>Panelists categorized scenarios assessing when to use bladder scanners, catheterization at various scanned bladder volumes, and choice of catheterization modalities as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain. Next, qualitative methods were used to understand the perceived need, usability, and potential algorithm uses.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi240714-8\"><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The 11-member expert panel (10 men and 1 woman) used the RAND\/UCLA Appropriateness Method to develop a UR algorithm including the following: (1) bladder scanners were preferred over catheterization for UR diagnosis in symptomatic patients or starting as soon as 3 hours since last void if asymptomatic, (2) bladder scanner volumes appropriate to prompt catheterization were 300 mL or greater in symptomatic patients and 500 mL or greater in asymptomatic patients, and (3) intermittent was preferred to indwelling catheterization for managing lower bladder volumes. Interview findings were organized into 3 domains (perceived need, feedback on algorithm, and implementation suggestions). The 33 frontline clinicians (9 men and 24 women) who reviewed the algorithm reported that an evidence-based protocol (1) was needed and could be helpful to clinicians, (2) should be simple and graphically appealing to improve rapid clinician review, and (3) should be integrated within the electronic medical record and prominently displayed in hospital units to increase awareness. The draft algorithm was iteratively refined based on stakeholder feedback.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi240714-9\"><jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance<\/jats:title><jats:p>In this study using a systematic, multidisciplinary, evidence- and expert opinion\u2013based approach, a UR evaluation and catheterization algorithm was developed to improve patient safety by increasing appropriate use of bladder scanners and catheterization. This algorithm addresses the need for practical guidance to manage UR among adult inpatients.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2024.22281","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,16]],"date-time":"2024-07-16T16:02:12Z","timestamp":1721145732000},"page":"e2422281","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Urinary Retention Evaluation and Catheterization Algorithm for Adult Inpatients"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"7","author":[{"given":"Kristin","family":"Chrouser","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor"},{"name":"VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Karen E.","family":"Fowler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jason D.","family":"Mann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Martha","family":"Quinn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jessica","family":"Ameling","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Samantha","family":"Hendren","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor"},{"name":"Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, Ann Arbor"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Greta","family":"Krapohl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, Ann Arbor"},{"name":"Veterans Health Administration National Center for Patient Safety, Ann Arbor, Michigan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ted A.","family":"Skolarus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan"},{"name":"Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Steven J.","family":"Bernstein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan"},{"name":"Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jennifer","family":"Meddings","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan"},{"name":"Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor"},{"name":"Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,16]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"zoi240714r1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjqs-2012-001774","article-title":"Reducing unnecessary urinary catheter use and other strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: an integrative review.","volume":"23","author":"Meddings","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMJ Qual Saf"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi240714r2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-159-6-201309170-00006","article-title":"Determining the noninfectious complications of indwelling urethral catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"159","author":"Hollingsworth","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi240714r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1139","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0b013e31819f7aea","article-title":"Postoperative urinary retention: anesthetic and perioperative considerations.","volume":"110","author":"Baldini","year":"2009","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi240714r4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1016\/S0196-6553(00)90015-4","article-title":"Clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial catheter-related bacteriuria.","volume":"28","author":"Saint","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Infect Control"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi240714r5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1167","DOI":"10.1097\/CCM.0b013e31820a8581","article-title":"Relationship of catheter-associated urinary tract infection to mortality and length of stay in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.","volume":"39","author":"Chant","year":"2011","journal-title":"Crit Care Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi240714r6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1464-410x.2000.00409.x","article-title":"Acute urinary retention.","volume":"85","author":"Choong","year":"2000","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"9","key":"zoi240714r8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S1","DOI":"10.7326\/M14-1304","article-title":"The Ann Arbor criteria for appropriate urinary catheter use in hospitalized medical patients: results obtained by using the RAND\/UCLA appropriateness method.","volume":"162","author":"Meddings","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi240714r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjqs-2018-008025","article-title":"Michigan appropriate perioperative (MAP) criteria for urinary catheter use in common general and orthopaedic surgeries: results obtained using the RAND\/UCLA Appropriateness Method.","volume":"28","author":"Meddings","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ Qual Saf"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi240714r10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004326","article-title":"ACCORD (Accurate Consensus Reporting Document): a reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi.","volume":"21","author":"Gattrell","year":"2024","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"zoi240714r12","first-page":"e366","article-title":"Catheter management after benign transurethral prostate surgery: RAND\/UCLA Appropriateness Criteria.","volume":"25","author":"Skolarus","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Manag Care"},{"issue":"10","key":"zoi240714r13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1004","DOI":"10.1016\/S0895-4356(01)00365-1","article-title":"Sensitivity and specificity of the RAND\/UCLA Appropriateness Method to identify the overuse and underuse of coronary revascularization and hysterectomy.","volume":"54","author":"Shekelle","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi240714r14","first-page":"117","article-title":"Defining appropriateness criteria for endoscopic sinus surgery during management of uncomplicated adult chronic rhinosinusitis: a RAND\/UCLA appropriateness study.","volume":"54","author":"Rudmik","year":"2016","journal-title":"Rhinology"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi240714r15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.07.005","article-title":"Appropriateness criteria for active surveillance of prostate cancer.","volume":"197","author":"Cher","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi240714r17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266462300002774","article-title":"A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies.","volume":"2","author":"Brook","year":"1986","journal-title":"Int J Technol Assess Health Care"},{"issue":"10","key":"zoi240714r21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-019993","article-title":"Can rapid approaches to qualitative analysis deliver timely, valid findings to clinical leaders? a mixed methods study comparing rapid and thematic analysis.","volume":"8","author":"Taylor","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi240714r22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"656","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-4295(03)00559-4","article-title":"Accuracy of bladder volume determinations by ultrasonography: are they accurate over entire bladder volume range?","volume":"62","author":"Byun","year":"2003","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi240714r23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"458","DOI":"10.4037\/ajcc2020741","article-title":"Accuracy of measuring bladder volumes with ultrasound and bladder scanning.","volume":"29","author":"Schallom","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Crit Care"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi240714r24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-137-2-200207160-00012","article-title":"Indwelling urinary catheters: a one-point restraint?","volume":"137","author":"Saint","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi240714r25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1078","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2018.2417","article-title":"A multicenter study of patient-reported infectious and noninfectious complications associated with indwelling urethral catheters.","volume":"178","author":"Saint","year":"2018","journal-title":"JAMA Intern Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi240714r26","first-page":"577","article-title":"Impact of varying panel membership on ratings of appropriateness in consensus panels: a comparison of a multi- and single disciplinary panel.","volume":"30","author":"Coulter","year":"1995","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi240714r27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"512","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-199606000-00002","article-title":"Variations by specialty in physician ratings of the appropriateness and necessity of indications for procedures.","volume":"34","author":"Kahan","year":"1996","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi240714r28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1408","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2010.05.096","article-title":"Comparison of 2 techniques to predict voiding efficiency after inpatient urogynecologic surgery.","volume":"184","author":"Pulvino","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"zoi240714r7","author":"Stoffel","year":"2016"},{"key":"zoi240714r11","volume-title":"The RAND\/UCLA Appropriateness Method User\u2019s Manual","author":"Fitch","year":"2001"},{"key":"zoi240714r20","volume-title":"Rapid Assessment Process: An Introduction","author":"Beebe","year":"2001"},{"key":"zoi240714r16","unstructured":"Michigan Institute for Healthcare Policy & Innovation. Patient Safety Enhancement Program (PSEP). University of Michigan. Accessed June 3, 2024. https:\/\/ihpi.umich.edu\/our-experts-partners\/collaborating-centers-programs\/PSEP"},{"key":"zoi240714r18","unstructured":"Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative. SUCCESS toolkit for enhancing urinary catheter appropriateness and safety for adult surgical patients. Last reviewed September 2023. Accessed June 3, 2024. https:\/\/msqc.org\/success\/"},{"key":"zoi240714r19","unstructured":"Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative. Accessed June 3, 2024. https:\/\/msqc.org\/"}],"container-title":["JAMA Network Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/articlepdf\/2821168\/chrouser_2024_oi_240714_1720040131.21871.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,16]],"date-time":"2024-07-16T16:02:18Z","timestamp":1721145738000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/fullarticle\/2821168"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,16]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2024.22281","relation":{},"ISSN":["2574-3805"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2574-3805","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,16]]}}}