{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,3]],"date-time":"2026-08-03T17:20:14Z","timestamp":1785777614402,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":82,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA Netw Open"],"abstract":"Importance<\/jats:title>In 2024, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) reversed a 2009 policy recommending only females aged 50 to 74 years complete a biennial mammogram. Understanding whether females facing heterogeneous breast cancer risks responded to the 2009 guidance may illuminate how they may respond to the latest policy update.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Objective<\/jats:title>To evaluate whether the 2009 policy was associated with changes in mammography screening in females no longer recommended to complete a biennial mammogram and whether these changes varied by factors associated with breast cancer risk.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Design, Setting, and Participants<\/jats:title>The difference-in-differences design compared biennial mammogram trends in the exposed groups (aged 40-49 and \u226575 years) with trends of the unexposed groups (aged 50-64 and 65-74 years), before and after the 2009 update. Population-based, repeated cross-sectional survey data came from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) biennial cancer screening module (2000-2018). The sample was restricted to females between ages 40 and 84 years. Data were analyzed from March 1 to June 30, 2024.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Main Outcomes and Measures<\/jats:title>The outcome was a binary variable indicating whether the respondent reported a mammogram in the past 2 years (biennial). After 2009, females aged 40 to 49 and 75 or older years were exposed to the policy update, as a complete biennial mammogram was recommended. Subgroup analyses included race and ethnicity, educational level, household income, smoking history, current binge drinking status, and state of residence.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Results<\/jats:title>The sample included 1\u202f594\u202f834 females; 75% reported a biennial mammogram. In those aged 40 to 49 years, the USPSTF update was associated with a 1.1 percentage-point (95% CI, \u22121.8% to \u22120.3 percentage points) decrease in the probability of a biennial mammogram, with the largest decreases in the non-Hispanic Black population (\u22123.0 percentage points; 95% CI, \u22125.5% to \u22120.5 percentage points). In the aged 75 years or older group, the USPSTF update was associated with a 4.8 percentage-point decrease (95% CI, \u22126.3% to \u22123.5 percentage points) in the probability of a biennial mammogram, with significant heterogeneity by race and ethnicity, binge drinking status, and state residence.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Conclusions and Relevance<\/jats:title>In this study, socioeconomic factors were associated with differences in how females responded to the 2009 USPSTF mammography recommendation. Whether the 2024 update considered such differences is unclear. These findings suggest that including risk assessment into future USPSTF policy updates may improve adoption of risk-reducing interventions and shorten the time to diagnosis and treatment for high-risk patients.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2024.58141","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,5]],"date-time":"2025-02-05T16:01:01Z","timestamp":1738771261000},"page":"e2458141","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Socioeconomic and Geographic Differences in Mammography Trends Following the 2009 USPSTF Policy Update"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Jason","family":"Semprini","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Public Health, Des Moines University College of Health Sciences, West Des Moines, Iowa"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Loren","family":"Saulsberry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Olufunmilayo I.","family":"Olopade","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Section of Hematology\/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,5]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"zoi241627r1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21754","article-title":"Breast cancer statistics, 2022.","volume":"72","author":"Giaquinto","year":"2022","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"issue":"13","key":"zoi241627r2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2971","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.32859","article-title":"Mammography screening reduces rates of advanced and fatal breast cancers: results in 549,091 women.","volume":"126","author":"Duffy","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi241627r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1257\/jep.35.2.119","article-title":"Mammograms and mortality: how has the evidence evolved?","volume":"35","author":"Kowalski","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Econ Perspect"},{"issue":"12","key":"zoi241627r4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3836","DOI":"10.1257\/aer.20191191","article-title":"Screening and selection: the case of mammograms.","volume":"110","author":"Einav","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am Econ Rev"},{"issue":"5, pt 1","key":"zoi241627r5","first-page":"344","article-title":"Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale.","volume":"137","author":"US Preventive Services Task Force","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi241627r6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"611","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzr050","article-title":"Are United States and Canadian cancer screening rates consistent with guideline information regarding the age of screening initiation?","volume":"23","author":"Kadiyala","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int J Qual Health Care"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi241627r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.7326\/M15-0969","article-title":"Effectiveness of breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis to update the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.","volume":"164","author":"Nelson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi241627r10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amepre.2010.12.027","article-title":"The public\u2019s response to the US Preventive Services Task Force\u2019s 2009 recommendations on mammography screening.","volume":"40","author":"Squiers","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Prev Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi241627r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e313","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2014.03.003","article-title":"Physician adherence to US Preventive Services Task Force mammography guidelines.","volume":"24","author":"Corbelli","year":"2014","journal-title":"Womens Health Issues"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi241627r12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-015-3449-5","article-title":"Provider attitudes and screening practices following changes in breast and cervical cancer screening guidelines.","volume":"31","author":"Haas","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi241627r13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1089\/pop.2015.0180","article-title":"The Immediate impact of the 2009 USPSTF screening guideline change on physician recommendation of a screening mammogram: findings from a national ambulatory and medical care survey-based study.","volume":"20","author":"Rajan","year":"2017","journal-title":"Popul Health Manag"},{"key":"zoi241627r14","article-title":"Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.","author":"US Preventive Services Task Force","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"22","key":"zoi241627r15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1931","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2023.25844","article-title":"Screening for breast cancer: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.","volume":"331","author":"Henderson","year":"2024","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"11","key":"zoi241627r17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2205","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.2013.177","article-title":"The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.","volume":"108","author":"Marmot","year":"2013","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi241627r18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.7326\/M15-0970","article-title":"Harms of breast cancer screening: systematic review to update the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.","volume":"164","author":"Nelson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi241627r19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"634","DOI":"10.3122\/jabfm.2021.03.200505","article-title":"Multilevel small area estimation of prostate-specific antigen screening test in the United States by age group: 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.","volume":"34","author":"Berkowitz","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Am Board Fam Med"},{"issue":"10","key":"zoi241627r20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1485","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2012.11013.x","article-title":"Prostate-specific antigen testing in older men in the USA: data from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system.","volume":"110","author":"Scosyrev","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi241627r21","first-page":"127","article-title":"Colorectal cancer screening after changes in US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines with increased screening options.","volume":"120","author":"Benson","year":"2021","journal-title":"WMJ"},{"issue":"23","key":"zoi241627r23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2595","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2016.6828","article-title":"Estimation of benefits, burden, and harms of colorectal cancer screening strategies: modeling study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.","volume":"315","author":"Knudsen","year":"2016","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"12","key":"zoi241627r24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1720","DOI":"10.1089\/jwh.2020.8546","article-title":"The impact of mammography screening guideline changes in a universally insured population.","volume":"30","author":"Bytnar","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Womens Health (Larchmt)"},{"issue":"11-12","key":"zoi241627r25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2088","DOI":"10.1093\/milmed\/usaa176","article-title":"The impact of mammography screening guideline changes among women serving in the US military.","volume":"185","author":"Bytnar","year":"2020","journal-title":"Mil Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"zoi241627r26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"875","DOI":"10.1089\/jwh.2017.6425","article-title":"Lack of impact of the 2009 USPSTF guidelines on rates of mammography screening.","volume":"27","author":"Brown","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Womens Health (Larchmt)"},{"issue":"10","key":"zoi241627r27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1030","DOI":"10.1089\/jwh.2015.5701","article-title":"Screening mammography use among older women before and after the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.","volume":"25","author":"Chang","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Womens Health (Larchmt)"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi241627r28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2015.03.002","article-title":"Screening mammography rates in the Medicare Population before and after the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force guideline change: an interrupted time series analysis.","volume":"25","author":"Jiang","year":"2015","journal-title":"Womens Health Issues"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi241627r29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0091399","article-title":"Impact of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines on screening mammography rates on women in their 40s.","volume":"9","author":"Wang","year":"2014","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi241627r30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1111\/tbj.12703","article-title":"Change in mammography use following the revised guidelines from the US Preventive Services Task Force.","volume":"23","author":"Lee","year":"2017","journal-title":"Breast J"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi241627r31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"820","DOI":"10.1089\/jwh.2016.6076","article-title":"Change in breast cancer screening intervals since the 2009 USPSTF guideline.","volume":"26","author":"Wernli","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Womens Health (Larchmt)"},{"issue":"14","key":"zoi241627r32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2518","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.28105","article-title":"Trends in mammography screening rates after publication of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.","volume":"119","author":"Pace","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi241627r33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1533","DOI":"10.1111\/1475-6773.12445","article-title":"The effect of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force breast cancer screening recommendations on mammography rates.","volume":"51","author":"Gray","year":"2016","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi241627r34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"706","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaoncol.2024.0905","article-title":"USPSTF breast cancer screening guidelines do not go far enough.","volume":"10","author":"Berg","year":"2024","journal-title":"JAMA Oncol"},{"issue":"22","key":"zoi241627r35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1896","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2024.6052","article-title":"Toward more equitable breast cancer outcomes.","volume":"331","author":"Elmore","year":"2024","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi241627r36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2024.11638","article-title":"New recommendations for breast cancer screening\u2014in pursuit of health equity.","volume":"7","author":"Pace","year":"2024","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"7","key":"zoi241627r37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"769","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjmed.2017.02.021","article-title":"How the USPSTF\u2019s mammographic screening guidelines should be interpreted.","volume":"130","author":"Prasad","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Med"},{"key":"zoi241627r40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2017.10.019","article-title":"Comparing cancer screening estimates: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and National Health Interview Survey.","volume":"106","author":"Sauer","year":"2018","journal-title":"Prev Med"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi241627r41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010","article-title":"The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.","volume":"147","author":"von Elm","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi241627r42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/fmch-2022-001893","article-title":"The 2020 US cancer screening deficit and the timing of adults\u2019 most recent screen: a population-based cross-sectional study.","volume":"11","author":"Semprini","year":"2023","journal-title":"Fam Med Community Health"},{"issue":"10352","key":"zoi241627r43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"563","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(22)01438-6","article-title":"The global burden of cancer attributable to risk factors, 2010-19: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.","volume":"400","author":"Tran","year":"2022","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi241627r44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2017.76.1155","article-title":"Alcohol and cancer: a statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.","volume":"36","author":"LoConte","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi241627r45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2022.9706","article-title":"Inclusion of the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation for mammography in state comprehensive cancer control plans in the US.","volume":"5","author":"Soori","year":"2022","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi241627r46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2023.28171","article-title":"Patterns in cancer incidence among people younger than 50 years in the US, 2010 to 2019.","volume":"6","author":"Koh","year":"2023","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi241627r48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-publhealth-040617-013507","article-title":"Designing difference in difference studies: best practices for public health policy research.","volume":"39","author":"Wing","year":"2018","journal-title":"Annu Rev Public Health"},{"key":"zoi241627r49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00220973.2019.1699769","article-title":"Alternatives to logistic regression models in experimental studies.","author":"Huang","journal-title":"J Exp Educ"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi241627r50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.3368\/jhr.50.2.301","article-title":"What are we weighting for?","volume":"50","author":"Solon","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Hum Resour"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi241627r51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.3368\/jhr.50.2.317","article-title":"A practitioner\u2019s guide to cluster-robust inference.","volume":"50","author":"Cameron","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Hum Resour"},{"key":"zoi241627r52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2555","DOI":"10.1093\/restud\/rdad018","article-title":"A more credible approach to parallel trends.","volume":"90","author":"Rambachan","year":"2023","journal-title":"Rev Econ Stud"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi241627r53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.1108\/RAUSP-05-2019-0112","article-title":"Impact evaluation using difference-in-differences.","volume":"54","author":"Fredriksson","year":"2019","journal-title":"RAUSP Management J"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi241627r54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1097\/EDE.0000000000001676","article-title":"Universal difference-in-differences for causal inference in epidemiology.","volume":"35","author":"Tchetgen Tchetgen","year":"2024","journal-title":"Epidemiology"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi241627r55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/0034-6527.00321","article-title":"Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators.","volume":"72","author":"Abadie","year":"2005","journal-title":"Rev Econ Stud"},{"issue":"10439","key":"zoi241627r56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1895","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(24)00747-5","article-title":"The Lancet Breast Cancer Commission.","volume":"403","author":"Coles","year":"2024","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi241627r57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1016\/S0277-9536(99)00338-X","article-title":"The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians\u2019 perceptions of patients.","volume":"50","author":"van Ryn","year":"2000","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi241627r58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.18865\/ed.31.1.119","article-title":"Trust and mistrust in shaping adaptation and de-implementation in the context of changing screening guidelines.","volume":"31","author":"Shelton","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ethn Dis"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi241627r59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1007\/s10552-020-01354-5","article-title":"Age at initiation of screening mammography by family history of breast cancer in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.","volume":"32","author":"Durham","year":"2021","journal-title":"Cancer Causes Control"},{"key":"zoi241627r60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2022.04.003","article-title":"Global guidelines for breast cancer screening: a systematic review.","volume":"64","author":"Ren","year":"2022","journal-title":"Breast"},{"issue":"7","key":"zoi241627r61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1080\/10810730.2020.1788677","article-title":"Relationships of family history\u2013related factors and causal beliefs to cancer risk perception and mammography screening adherence among medically underserved women.","volume":"25","author":"Hong","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Health Commun"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi241627r62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"452","DOI":"10.1016\/S0027-9684(15)30552-6","article-title":"Mammography screening trends: the perspective of African American women born pre\/post World War II.","volume":"102","author":"Williams","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Natl Med Assoc"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi241627r63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-21-0191","article-title":"Long-term mammography adherence among uninsured women enrolled in the Breast Screening and Patient Navigation (BSPAN) program.","volume":"31","author":"Nair","year":"2022","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi241627r64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"873","DOI":"10.1111\/1475-6773.14102","article-title":"The social vulnerability metric (SVM) as a new tool for public health.","volume":"58","author":"Saulsberry","year":"2023","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi241627r70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1177\/1532440012438890","article-title":"State policy innovativeness revisited.","volume":"12","author":"Boehmke","year":"2012","journal-title":"State Polit Policy Q"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi241627r71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(21)00071-1","article-title":"The Global Breast Cancer Initiative: a strategic collaboration to strengthen health care for non-communicable diseases.","volume":"22","author":"Anderson","year":"2021","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"zoi241627r72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1178","DOI":"10.1200\/GO.20.00068","article-title":"Evaluating the effect of Medicaid expansion on Black\/White breast cancer mortality disparities: a difference-in-difference analysis.","volume":"6","author":"Semprini","year":"2020","journal-title":"JCO Glob Oncol"},{"key":"zoi241627r73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2023.01.003","article-title":"Polygenic risk scores and breast cancer risk prediction.","volume":"67","author":"Roberts","year":"2023","journal-title":"Breast"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi241627r74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"651","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000239","article-title":"Breast cancer epidemiology and risk factors.","volume":"59","author":"Rojas","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi241627r75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-019-05340-7","article-title":"Social determinants of breast cancer risk, stage, and survival.","volume":"177","author":"Coughlin","year":"2019","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"issue":"9472","key":"zoi241627r76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1727","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(05)66546-4","article-title":"Breast cancer.","volume":"365","author":"Veronesi","year":"2005","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi241627r77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mcna.2022.10.007","article-title":"Breast cancer: risk assessment, screening, and primary prevention.","volume":"107","author":"Michaels","year":"2023","journal-title":"Med Clin North Am"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi241627r78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1871","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-6773.2006.00689.x","article-title":"Time allocation in primary care office visits.","volume":"42","author":"Tai-Seale","year":"2007","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"13","key":"zoi241627r79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1477","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.23.00295","article-title":"Comprehensive inherited risk estimation for risk-based breast cancer screening in women.","volume":"42","author":"Mars","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"19","key":"zoi241627r80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1965","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2021.6238","article-title":"Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.","volume":"325","author":"Davidson","year":"2021","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"11","key":"zoi241627r81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1166","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(23)00514-4","article-title":"Understanding cancer risk in patients at lower risk to improve early cancer diagnosis.","volume":"24","author":"Zhou","year":"2023","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi241627r82","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.1111\/hex.13016","article-title":"Communicating cancer risk in the primary care consultation when using a cancer risk assessment tool: qualitative study with service users and practitioners.","volume":"23","author":"Akanuwe","year":"2020","journal-title":"Health Expect"},{"key":"zoi241627r39","volume-title":"StatPearls","author":"Rolle-Lake","year":"2020"},{"key":"zoi241627r8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nelson? HD, Cantor? A, Humphrey? L, . Screening for breast cancer: a systematic review to update the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2016. Accessed December 6, 2023. https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/books\/NBK343819\/","DOI":"10.7326\/M15-0970"},{"key":"zoi241627r9","unstructured":"United States Preventive Services Taskforce. Breast cancer screening. 2009. Accessed February 29, 2024. https:\/\/www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org\/uspstf\/recommendation\/breast-cancer-screening-2009"},{"key":"zoi241627r16","unstructured":"United States Preventive Services Taskforce. Recommendation: breast cancer: screening. April 30, 2024. Accessed December 23, 2024. https:\/\/www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org\/uspstf\/recommendation\/breast-cancer-screening"},{"key":"zoi241627r22","unstructured":"Knudsen? AB, Rutter? CM, Peterse? EFP, . Colorectal cancer screening: an updated decision analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2021. Accessed January 22, 2024. https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/books\/NBK570833\/"},{"key":"zoi241627r38","unstructured":"CDC. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. January 9, 2024. Accessed February 29, 2024. https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/brfss\/index.html"},{"key":"zoi241627r47","unstructured":"USCS Data Visualizations. Accessed December 23, 2024. https:\/\/gis.cdc.gov\/cancer\/USCS\/#\/AtAGlance\/"},{"key":"zoi241627r65","unstructured":"KFF. Status of state Medicaid expansion decisions: interactive map. 2024. Accessed May 9, 2024. https:\/\/www.kff.org\/affordable-care-act\/issue-brief\/status-of-state-medicaid-expansion-decisions-interactive-map\/"},{"key":"zoi241627r66","unstructured":"CEA. The effects of earlier Medicaid expansions: a literature review. White House. 2021. Accessed May 19, 2023. https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/cea\/written-materials\/2021\/06\/22\/the-effects-of-earlier-medicaid-expansions-a-literature-review\/"},{"key":"zoi241627r67","unstructured":"KFF. States getting a jump start on health reform\u2019s Medicaid expansion. KFF. April 2, 2012. Accessed May 25, 2022. https:\/\/www.kff.org\/health-reform\/issue-brief\/states-getting-a-jump-start-on-health\/"},{"key":"zoi241627r68","unstructured":"Commonwealth Fund. 2023 Scorecard on state health system performance. 2023. Accessed June 1, 2024. https:\/\/www.commonwealthfund.org\/publications\/scorecard\/2023\/jun\/2023-scorecard-state-health-system-performance"},{"key":"zoi241627r69","unstructured":"AHRQ. Social determinants of health database. 2022. Accessed April 5, 2023. https:\/\/www.ahrq.gov\/sdoh\/data-analytics\/sdoh-data.html"}],"container-title":["JAMA Network Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/articlepdf\/2829856\/semprini_2025_oi_241627_1738082692.90031.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,5]],"date-time":"2025-02-05T16:01:10Z","timestamp":1738771270000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/fullarticle\/2829856"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,5]]},"references-count":82,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,3]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2024.58141","relation":{},"ISSN":["2574-3805"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2574-3805","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,5]]}}}