{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T14:09:29Z","timestamp":1786975769296,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA Netw Open"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250559-4\">\n                    <jats:title>Importance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Medicare is the primary health insurance payer for 1.5 million reproductive-aged women with disabilities, yet it is the only major form of US health insurance that is not required to cover contraceptives for pregnancy prevention.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250559-5\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To evaluate whether Medicare\u2019s contraceptive coverage gaps were associated with reduced use of contraceptives by enrollees with disabilities.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250559-6\">\n                    <jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this national, cross-sectional study, traditional Medicare (TM), Medicare Advantage (MA), and Medicaid claims from female enrollees aged 20 to 49 years receiving Social Security Disability Insurance or Supplemental Security Income from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020, were linked. The propensity score\u2013weighted probability of contraceptive use by public insurance type was estimated, then the association between gaining contraceptive coverage through a transition from Medicare to dual Medicare-Medicaid enrollment and contraceptive use was evaluated using a staggered-entry difference-in-differences design. Data were analyzed from December 3, 2024, to April 5, 2025.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250559-7\">\n                    <jats:title>Exposures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Public insurance enrollment in TM, MA, dual TM-Medicaid, dual MA-Medicaid, or Medicaid.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250559-8\">\n                    <jats:title>Main Outcomes and Measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Monthly use of permanent contraceptives, long-acting reversible contraceptives (intrauterine device and implant), and short-acting contraceptives (injectable and oral contraceptives, patch, and ring).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250559-9\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 51\u202f501\u202f303 monthly observations from 1\u202f606\u202f129 women were included in the analysis. Mean (SD) age was 35.93 (8.58) years; 1.8% of monthly observations were from Asian women, 30.7% from Black women, 13.0% from Hispanic women, 52.6% from White women, and 1.9% from multiracial women or women identifying as another race and ethnicity not reported on previously. Those enrolled in TM and MA were more often older and non-Hispanic White compared with those dual enrolled or enrolled in Medicaid. The estimated monthly probability of use of any contraceptive method was lowest among TM (4.9%; 95% CI, 4.9%-4.9%) and MA (6.6%; 95% CI, 6.5%-6.6%) enrollees, followed by Medicaid (11.0%; 95% CI, 11.0%-11.0%), dual MA-Medicaid (11.3%; 95% CI, 11.3%-11.4%), and dual TM-Medicaid (13.1%; 95% CI, 13.0%-13.1%) enrollees. Gaining contraceptive coverage through dual enrollment was associated with an increase of 3.9 (95% CI, 3.5-4.3) percentage points (35%) in use of any contraceptive method, with the largest increase in use of short-acting methods at 2.6 (95% CI, 2.3-3.0) percentage points (45%).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250559-10\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this cross-sectional study of contraceptive use in the Medicare program, gaining contraceptive coverage through dual Medicare-Medicaid enrollment was associated with increased contraceptive use among disabled Medicare enrollees, suggesting that Medicare\u2019s coverage gaps pose a financial barrier to desired contraceptive use. Given these findings, Medicare should be required to cover all US Food and Drug Administration\u2013approved contraceptive methods without cost-sharing. Doing so would align Medicare\u2019s coverage requirements with those of Medicaid, private insurance plans, and TRICARE.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2025.17718","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,25]],"date-time":"2025-06-25T11:31:24Z","timestamp":1750851084000},"page":"e2517718","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Coverage Gaps and Contraceptive Use Among Medicare Enrollees With Disabilities"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Meghan","family":"Bellerose","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jacqueline","family":"Ellison","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maria W.","family":"Steenland","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island"},{"name":"Brown University Population Studies and Training Center, Providence, Rhode Island"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David J.","family":"Meyers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Monika","family":"Mitra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Theresa I.","family":"Shireman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,25]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"zoi250559r1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dhjo.2017.03.014","article-title":"Disparities in receipt of family planning services by disability status: new estimates from the National Survey of Family Growth.","volume":"10","author":"Mosher","year":"2017","journal-title":"Disabil Health J"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi250559r2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dhjo.2018.11.006","article-title":"Contraceptive knowledge and use among women with intellectual, physical, or sensory disabilities: a systematic review.","volume":"12","author":"Horner-Johnson","year":"2019","journal-title":"Disabil Health J"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi250559r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"732","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogn.2021.07.005","article-title":"Experiences of women with disabilities in accessing and receiving contraceptive care.","volume":"50","author":"Horner-Johnson","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi250559r8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.2020.01710","article-title":"ACA mandate led to substantial increase in contraceptive use among women enrolled in high-deductible health plans.","volume":"40","author":"Becker","year":"2021","journal-title":"Health Aff (Millwood)"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi250559r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2018.01.005","article-title":"The impact of the Affordable Care Act on contraceptive use and costs among privately insured women.","volume":"28","author":"Snyder","year":"2018","journal-title":"Womens Health Issues"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi250559r10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.09.003","article-title":"The Affordable Care Act contraception mandate & unintended pregnancy in women of reproductive age: an analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth, 2008-2010 v. 2013-2015.","volume":"101","author":"MacCallum-Bridges","year":"2020","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"9","key":"zoi250559r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1608","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.2015.1457","article-title":"Affordable Care Act\u2019s mandate eliminating contraceptive cost sharing influenced choices of women with employer coverage.","volume":"35","author":"Carlin","year":"2016","journal-title":"Health Aff (Millwood)"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi250559r14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.2023.00286","article-title":"Contraceptive service use among traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage enrollees.","volume":"43","author":"Ellison","year":"2024","journal-title":"Health Aff (Millwood)"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi250559r19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"656","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwn164","article-title":"Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models.","volume":"168","author":"Cole","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"zoi250559r20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"l5657","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l5657","article-title":"Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners.","volume":"367","author":"Desai","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi250559r21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jeconom.2020.12.001","article-title":"Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods.","volume":"225","author":"Callaway","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Econom"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi250559r23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1162\/003355304772839588","article-title":"How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?*.","volume":"119","author":"Bertrand","year":"2004","journal-title":"Q J Econ"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi250559r32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2022.01.001","article-title":"\u201cIt would have been nice to have a choice\u201d: barriers to contraceptive decision-making among women with disabilities.","volume":"32","author":"Horner-Johnson","year":"2022","journal-title":"Womens Health Issues"},{"key":"zoi250559r33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.2147\/OAJC.S360833","article-title":"Shared decision-making: the way forward for postpartum contraceptive counseling.","volume":"13","author":"Bullington","year":"2022","journal-title":"Open Access J Contracept"},{"key":"zoi250559r7","volume-title":"State and Federal Contraceptive Coverage Requirements: Implications for Women and Employers","author":"Sobel","year":"2018"},{"key":"zoi250559r15","volume-title":"Demystifying Disability: What to Know, What to Say, and How to Be an Ally","author":"Ladau","year":"2021"},{"key":"zoi250559r30","volume-title":"Forced Sterilization of Disabled People in the United States","author":"National Women\u2019s Law Center","year":"2021"},{"key":"zoi250559r4","unstructured":"Frederiksen? B, Diep? K, Salganicoff? A. Contraceptive experiences, coverage, and preferences: findings from the 2024 KFF Women\u2019s Health Survey. November 22, 2024. Accessed December 23, 2024. https:\/\/www.kff.org\/womens-health-policy\/issue-brief\/contraceptive-experiences-coverage-and-preferences-findings-from-the-2024-kff-womens-health-survey\/"},{"key":"zoi250559r5","unstructured":"PBS. A timeline of contraception. The American Experience Trust. Accessed December 23, 2024. https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/wgbh\/americanexperience\/features\/pill-timeline\/"},{"key":"zoi250559r6","unstructured":"Ranji? U, Bair? Y, Salganicoff? A. Medicaid and family planning: background and implications of the ACA. February 3, 2016. Accessed December 23, 2024. https:\/\/www.kff.org\/report-section\/medicaid-and-family-planning-medicaid-family-planning-policy\/"},{"key":"zoi250559r12","unstructured":"Hammer? R. TRICARE 2023 year in review: digital tools, demonstration projects, new benefits, and more. December 27, 2023. Accessed December 23, 2024. https:\/\/health.mil\/News\/Dvids-Articles\/2024\/01\/10\/news460867?type=Reports"},{"key":"zoi250559r13","unstructured":"Freed? M, Cubanski? J, Long? M, Ochieng? N, Salganicoff? A. Coverage of sexual and reproductive health services in Medicare. April 30, 2024. Accessed December 23, 2024. https:\/\/www.kff.org\/medicare\/issue-brief\/coverage-of-sexual-and-reproductive-health-services-in-medicare\/"},{"key":"zoi250559r16","unstructured":"Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Medicare savings programs. 2025. Accessed April 4, 2025. https:\/\/www.medicare.gov\/basics\/costs\/help\/medicare-savings-programs"},{"key":"zoi250559r17","unstructured":"Kaiser Family Foundation. Intrauterine devices (IUDs): access for women in the U.S. September 9, 2020.  Accessed December 23, 2024. https:\/\/www.kff.org\/womens-health-policy\/fact-sheet\/intrauterine-devices-iuds-access-for-women-in-the-u-s\/"},{"key":"zoi250559r18","unstructured":"Kaiser Family Foundation. Contraceptive implants. October 1, 2019. Accessed December 23, 2024. https:\/\/www.kff.org\/womens-health-policy\/fact-sheet\/contraceptive-implants\/"},{"key":"zoi250559r22","unstructured":"Harvey? R, Jankus? DD, Mosley? D. Random assignment of proxy event dates to unexposed individuals in observational studies: an automated technique using SAS\u00ae. Accessed December 23, 2024. https:\/\/www.mwsug.org\/proceedings\/2012\/PH\/MWSUG-2012-PH02.pdf"},{"key":"zoi250559r24","unstructured":"Kaiser Family Foundation. Trends in Medicaid income eligibility limits. 2023. Accessed December 23, 2024. https:\/\/www.kff.org\/state-category\/medicaid-chip\/trends-in-medicaid-income-eligibility-limits\/trends-in-income-eligibility-limits-for-adults\/"},{"key":"zoi250559r25","unstructured":"Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse. Other chronic health, mental health, and potentially disabling conditions. Accessed January 4, 2024. https:\/\/www2.ccwdata.org\/web\/guest\/condition-categories-other"},{"key":"zoi250559r26","unstructured":"White House. Fact sheet: President Biden issues executive order on strengthening access to contraception. June 23, 2023. Accessed December 23, 2024. https:\/\/bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov\/briefing-room\/statements-releases\/2023\/06\/23\/fact-sheet-president-biden-issues-executive-order-on-strengthening-access-to-contraception\/"},{"key":"zoi250559r27","unstructured":"Appleby? J. Most insurance covers IUDs: hers cost more than $14,000. KFF Health News. January 31, 2025. Accessed April 4, 2025. https:\/\/kffhealthnews.org\/news\/article\/surprise-bill-iud-pennsylvania-january-bill-of-the-month\/"},{"key":"zoi250559r28","unstructured":"Deventer? C. Birth control prices with and without insurance. ValuePenguin. January 8, 2025. Accessed April 4, 2025. https:\/\/www.valuepenguin.com\/health-insurance-coverage-contraceptives"},{"key":"zoi250559r29","unstructured":"Social Security Administration. Annual statistical report on the Social Security Disability Insurance program, 2023. Table 2. October 2024. Accessed December 23, 2024. https:\/\/www.ssa.gov\/policy\/docs\/statcomps\/di_asr\/index.html"},{"key":"zoi250559r31","unstructured":"Metraux? J. Forced sterilization of disabled people isn\u2019t a relic of the past. Mother Jones. February 28, 2025. Accessed April 3, 2025. https:\/\/www.motherjones.com\/politics\/2025\/02\/forced-sterilization-eugenics-scotus-state-laws\/"}],"container-title":["JAMA Network Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/articlepdf\/2835589\/bellerose_2025_oi_250559_1749834555.46213.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,25]],"date-time":"2025-06-25T11:31:29Z","timestamp":1750851089000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/fullarticle\/2835589"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,25]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,2]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2025.17718","relation":{},"ISSN":["2574-3805"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2574-3805","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,25]]}}}