{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,30]],"date-time":"2026-10-30T03:02:27Z","timestamp":1793329347933,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"7","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA Netw Open"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250637-4\">\n                    <jats:title>Importance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Vaccination is the safest and most effective way to prevent infectious diseases. It not only reduces disease in the vaccinated portion of a population but also potentially provides indirect benefit to the unvaccinated portion. Indirect benefits to the unvaccinated portion in a population are difficult to estimate since indirect benefits cannot be determined from the general population simply.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250637-5\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To estimate the influenza case burden, both direct and indirect, averted by vaccination using an agent-based model, which models agents as individuals in the simulation population.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250637-6\">\n                    <jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this decision analytical modeling study, simulations included varied levels of virus transmissibility, vaccine effectiveness, and vaccine uptake among the 2010 Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, census population. Simulations were run from August 15, 2022, to May 31, 2023. Individuals were vaccinated beginning in September of the simulation year.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250637-7\">\n                    <jats:title>Exposure<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Influenza infection.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250637-8\">\n                    <jats:title>Main Outcomes and Measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Differences between number of influenza cases in vaccinated and unvaccinated portions of the population.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250637-9\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The population used in this study consisted of 1\u202f218\u202f695 agents (median [IQR] age, 40.6 [3.6-77.6] years; 51% female) and was statistically similar in demographics to the 2010 Allegheny County census population. The mean (SD) burden of influenza averted by vaccination with a vaccine effectiveness of 40% ranged from 32.9% (0.9%) in the high transmission scenario to 41.5% (3.4%) in the low transmission scenario for seasonal influenza. In the model, indirect benefit to the unvaccinated portion of the population was found over a range of modeled transmissibility characteristics of seasonal influenza and varied levels of vaccine effectiveness and vaccination coverage; however, direct benefit to the vaccinated portion was greater in all scenarios. At the highest levels of transmissibility, such as might be found in pandemic influenza, indirect benefit decreased and eventually disappeared.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250637-10\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this analytical model study, influenza vaccination provided substantial benefit in reducing infections to both the vaccinated and unvaccinated portions of the population. Even when both vaccine effectiveness and vaccine uptake were low, vaccination showed marked reductions in disease burden for transmission levels characteristic of seasonal influenza. However, when the level of transmission was very high, even a highly effective vaccine did not protect unvaccinated individuals. These findings underscore the importance of vaccination in disease prevention and control and show that indirect benefits are limited in high transmission situations.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2025.21324","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,16]],"date-time":"2025-07-16T15:00:27Z","timestamp":1752678027000},"page":"e2521324","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["Estimated Burden of Influenza and Direct and Indirect Benefits of Influenza Vaccination"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Mary G.","family":"Krauland","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania"},{"name":"Public Health Dynamics Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexis","family":"Mandell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Public Health Dynamics Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mark S.","family":"Roberts","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania"},{"name":"Public Health Dynamics Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,16]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"zoi250637r1","first-page":"1055","article-title":"Field evaluation of vaccine efficacy.","volume":"63","author":"Orenstein","year":"1985","journal-title":"Bull World Health Organ"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi250637r2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1047","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vaccine.2005.09.017","article-title":"Universal vaccination of children against influenza: are there indirect benefits to the community? a systematic review of the evidence.","volume":"24","author":"Jordan","year":"2006","journal-title":"Vaccine"},{"issue":"10","key":"zoi250637r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"943","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2010.250","article-title":"Effect of influenza vaccination of children on infection rates in Hutterite communities: a randomized trial.","volume":"303","author":"Loeb","year":"2010","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"13","key":"zoi250637r4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1540","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vaccine.2004.09.025","article-title":"Herd immunity in adults against influenza-related illnesses with use of the trivalent-live attenuated influenza vaccine (CAIV-T) in children.","volume":"23","author":"Piedra","year":"2005","journal-title":"Vaccine"},{"issue":"12","key":"zoi250637r5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"889","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200103223441204","article-title":"The Japanese experience with vaccinating schoolchildren against influenza.","volume":"344","author":"Reichert","year":"2001","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"10","key":"zoi250637r6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1284","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vaccine.2004.08.044","article-title":"Population-wide benefits of routine vaccination of children against influenza.","volume":"23","author":"Weycker","year":"2005","journal-title":"Vaccine"},{"issue":"24","key":"zoi250637r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vaccine.2024.07.011","article-title":"Efficiency of indirect protection of COVID-19 vaccination and interactions between indirect and direct protection on household transmission.","volume":"42","author":"Takahashi","year":"2024","journal-title":"Vaccine"},{"key":"zoi250637r8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1090","DOI":"10.1038\/s41467-024-55029-9","article-title":"Strength and durability of indirect protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection through vaccine and infection-acquired immunity.","volume":"16","author":"Tan","year":"2025","journal-title":"Nat Comm"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi250637r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.36469\/9801","article-title":"Direct and indirect protection with pediatric quadrivalent live-attenuated influenza vaccination in Europe estimated by a dynamic transmission model.","volume":"5","author":"Gerlier","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Health Econ Outcomes Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi250637r10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1186\/s12879-017-2399-4","article-title":"Direct and indirect effects of influenza vaccination.","volume":"17","author":"Eichner","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Infect Dis"},{"issue":"218","key":"zoi250637r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1098\/rsif.2024.0299","article-title":"Quantifying indirect and direct vaccination effects arising in the SIR model.","volume":"21","author":"Lin","year":"2024","journal-title":"J R Soc Interface"},{"key":"zoi250637r12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"940","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2458-13-940","article-title":"FRED (a Framework for Reconstructing Epidemic Dynamics): an open-source software system for modeling infectious diseases and control strategies using census-based populations.","volume":"13","author":"Grefenstette","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Public Health"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi250637r13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amepre.2021.11.007","article-title":"Impact of low rates of influenza on next-season influenza infections.","volume":"62","author":"Krauland","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Prev Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi250637r14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/23814683241260744","article-title":"Modeling the impact of COVID-19 mitigation strategies in Pennsylvania, USA.","volume":"9","author":"Krauland","year":"2024","journal-title":"MDM Policy Pract"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi250637r15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2019.9768","article-title":"Forecasted size of measles outbreaks associated with vaccination exemptions for schoolchildren.","volume":"2","author":"Sinclair","year":"2019","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"key":"zoi250637r16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvacx.2022.100249","article-title":"Agent-based model of the impact of higher influenza vaccine efficacy on seasonal influenza burden.","volume":"13","author":"Krauland","year":"2023","journal-title":"Vaccine X"},{"issue":"11","key":"zoi250637r17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1799","DOI":"10.3390\/vaccines10111799","article-title":"Can a two-dose influenza vaccine regimen better protect older adults? an agent-based modeling study.","volume":"10","author":"Williams","year":"2022","journal-title":"Vaccines (Basel)"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi250637r19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-020-01172-x","article-title":"Indirect benefits are a crucial consideration when evaluating SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates.","volume":"27","author":"Gallagher","year":"2021","journal-title":"Nat Med"},{"issue":"36","key":"zoi250637r20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2807\/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.36.30013","article-title":"Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccine in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza in primary care in the United Kingdom: 2014\/15 end of season results.","volume":"20","author":"Pebody","year":"2015","journal-title":"Euro Surveill"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi250637r21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwx037","article-title":"Estimating Direct and Indirect Protective Effect of Influenza Vaccination in the United States.","volume":"186","author":"Arinaminpathy","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi250637r22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0056079","article-title":"Pneumococcal transmission and disease in silico: a microsimulation model of the indirect effects of vaccination.","volume":"8","author":"Nurhonen","year":"2013","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi250637r23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8833","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-12591-w","article-title":"Theoretically quantifying the direct and indirect benefits of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in terms of avoided deaths.","volume":"12","author":"Scutt","year":"2022","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi250637r24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"884","DOI":"10.1017\/S0950268809991245","article-title":"A mathematical model of the indirect effects of rotavirus vaccination.","volume":"138","author":"Van Effelterre","year":"2010","journal-title":"Epidemiol Infect"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi250637r25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1007\/s40272-016-0180-6","article-title":"Estimates of the public health impact of a pediatric vaccination program using an intranasal tetravalent live-attenuated influenza vaccine in Belgium.","volume":"18","author":"Gerlier","year":"2016","journal-title":"Paediatr Drugs"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi250637r26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.2165\/00019053-200826010-00005","article-title":"Dynamic modelling of infectious diseases: an application to the economic evaluation of influenza vaccination.","volume":"26","author":"Pradas-Velasco","year":"2008","journal-title":"Pharmacoeconomics"},{"issue":"41","key":"zoi250637r27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5321","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vaccine.2008.06.101","article-title":"Estimating the impact of childhood influenza vaccination programmes in England and Wales.","volume":"26","author":"Vynnycky","year":"2008","journal-title":"Vaccine"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi250637r28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1186\/s12879-017-2344-6","article-title":"Is the impact of childhood influenza vaccination less than expected: a transmission modelling study.","volume":"17","author":"Weidemann","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Infect Dis"},{"issue":"50","key":"zoi250637r29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7987","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vaccine.2010.09.044","article-title":"The impact of indirect benefits of vaccination on postlicensure vaccine effectiveness estimates: a scenario analysis.","volume":"28","author":"Patel","year":"2010","journal-title":"Vaccine"},{"issue":"47","key":"zoi250637r30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6700","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vaccine.2012.08.045","article-title":"Distinguishing vaccine efficacy and effectiveness.","volume":"30","author":"Shim","year":"2012","journal-title":"Vaccine"},{"key":"zoi250637r18","unstructured":"About Estimated Flu Burden. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed August 26, 2024. https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/flu-burden\/php\/about\/index.html"}],"container-title":["JAMA Network Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/articlepdf\/2836422\/krauland_2025_oi_250637_1751908813.05623.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,16]],"date-time":"2025-07-16T15:00:29Z","timestamp":1752678029000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/fullarticle\/2836422"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,16]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2025.21324","relation":{},"ISSN":["2574-3805"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2574-3805","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,16]]}}}