{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T14:07:58Z","timestamp":1786975678371,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"9","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA Netw Open"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250937-4\">\n                    <jats:title>Importance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Management of blunt splenic injury is evolving toward wider use of nonoperative approaches for splenic salvage, and splenic angioembolization (SAE) is being considered even in patients with hypotension on admission. Research is needed to understand the outcomes of these evolving management strategies.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250937-5\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare outcomes of the 3 major treatments approaches for splenic injury.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250937-6\">\n                    <jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A retrospective cohort study was performed using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP) database from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2022. The database collects injury data from more than 815 trauma centers in the US. Adults with isolated, severe (Abbreviated Injury Scale score \u22653) blunt splenic injury were identified. Isolated splenic injury was defined by the absence of other intra-abdominal injury and any other major associated injuries with an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 or higher. Data analysis was performed from September to December 2024.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250937-7\">\n                    <jats:title>Exposure<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Open splenectomy (OS) vs SAE vs observation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250937-8\">\n                    <jats:title>Main Outcomes and Measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The primary outcomes were mortality and any complication. Outcomes were compared using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250937-9\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 7567 patients (median [IQR] age, 36 [25-55] years; 4901 men [64.8%]) were studied, including 1499 (19.8%) in the OS group, 1547 (20.4%) in the SAE group, and 4521 (59.7%) in the observation group. In multivariable analysis, there was no difference in mortality in the overall cohort or in subgroups. Morbidity was significantly lower in the SAE (odds ratio [OR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.45-0.81;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;amp;lt;\u2009.001) and observation (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.92;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u2009.01) groups compared with the OS group. Among patients with hypotension, there was no mortality difference, but shorter hospital length of stay was found in the SAE (\u03b2\u2009=\u2009\u22121.44; 95% CI, \u22121.79 to \u22121.09;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;amp;lt;\u2009.001) and observation (\u03b2\u2009=\u2009\u22121.41; 95% CI, \u22121.73 to \u22121.09;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;amp;lt;\u2009.001) groups. Compared with initial OS, morbidity was higher for patients in whom SAE (OR, 5.39; 95% CI, 3.39-8.57;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;amp;lt;\u2009.001) and observation (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.44-2.64;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;amp;lt;\u2009.001) failed, and hospital length of stay was longer for these groups as well (\u03b2\u2009=\u20092.50; 95% CI, 1.27-3.73;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;amp;lt;\u2009.001 and \u03b2 = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.07-1.35;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u2009.03, respectively).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi250937-10\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this retrospective cohort study, nonoperative management (SAE or observation) was associated with favorable outcomes when compared with OS in isolated severe blunt splenic injury, even in patients with hypotension on admission. Failure of nonoperative management, however, risked higher morbidity without associated increase in mortality. With careful patient selection, splenic salvage may be possible and preferred even in severely injured patients.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2025.33266","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,23]],"date-time":"2025-09-23T15:00:15Z","timestamp":1758639615000},"page":"e2533266","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Outcomes of Isolated Severe Blunt Splenic Injury"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Wei","family":"Huang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles General Medical Center, Los Angeles, California"},{"name":"Peking University People\u2019s Hospital, Trauma Center, Beijing, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Caitlyn","family":"Braschi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles General Medical Center, Los Angeles, California"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Feifei","family":"Jin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Peking University People\u2019s Hospital, Trauma Center, Beijing, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Meghan","family":"Lewis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles General Medical Center, Los Angeles, California"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Demetrios","family":"Demetriades","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles General Medical Center, Los Angeles, California"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,23]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"zoi250937r1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1186\/s13017-017-0151-4","article-title":"Splenic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines for adult and pediatric patients.","volume":"12","author":"Coccolini","year":"2017","journal-title":"World J Emerg Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi250937r2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"356","DOI":"10.1097\/TA.0000000000001550","article-title":"Splenic artery embolization versus splenectomy: analysis for early in-hospital infectious complications and outcomes.","volume":"83","author":"Aiolfi","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Trauma Acute Care Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi250937r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1097\/TA.0b013e31823fe0b6","article-title":"Blunt splenic trauma: splenectomy increases early infectious complications: a prospective multicenter study.","volume":"72","author":"Demetriades","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Trauma Acute Care Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi250937r4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2024.25300","article-title":"Surgical repair vs splenectomy in patients with severe traumatic spleen injuries.","volume":"7","author":"Jakob","year":"2024","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"7","key":"zoi250937r5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2027","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-021-06063-x","article-title":"Post-traumatic splenic injury outcomes for nonoperative and operative management: a systematic review.","volume":"45","author":"Gill","year":"2021","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"zoi250937r6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2021.02.038","article-title":"Trends in blunt splenic injury management: the rise of splenic artery embolization.","volume":"265","author":"Marsh","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Surg Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi250937r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1264","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-015-3387-8","article-title":"Observation versus embolization in patients with blunt splenic injury after trauma: a propensity score analysis.","volume":"40","author":"Olthof","year":"2016","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi250937r8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.01.007","article-title":"Splenic preservation after isolated splenic blunt trauma: the angioembolization paradox.","volume":"170","author":"Schneider","year":"2021","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi250937r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1097\/TA.0000000000000782","article-title":"The splenic injury outcomes trial: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multi-institutional study.","volume":"79","author":"Zarzaur","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Trauma Acute Care Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi250937r10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1346","DOI":"10.1097\/TA.0b013e31818c29ea","article-title":"Proximal splenic angioembolization does not improve outcomes in treating blunt splenic injuries compared with splenectomy: a cohort analysis.","volume":"65","author":"Duchesne","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Trauma"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi250937r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"638","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-020-05819-1","article-title":"Splenic artery angioembolization is associated with increased venous thromboembolism.","volume":"45","author":"Lewis","year":"2021","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"zoi250937r12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2024.111753","article-title":"Complications and failure rate of splenic artery angioembolization following blunt splenic trauma: a systematic review.","volume":"55","author":"Alomar","year":"2024","journal-title":"Injury"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi250937r13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2021.09.020","article-title":"Immune function and the role of vaccination after splenic artery embolization for blunt splenic injury.","volume":"53","author":"Slater","year":"2022","journal-title":"Injury"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi250937r14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1177\/0003134820923325","article-title":"Emergency management of blunt splenic injury in hypotensive patients: total splenectomy versus splenic angioembolization.","volume":"86","author":"Guinto","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"zoi250937r15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2644","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-023-07156-5","article-title":"Angioembolization for isolated severe blunt splenic injuries with hemodynamic instability: a propensity score matched analysis.","volume":"47","author":"Aoki","year":"2023","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi250937r16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1186\/s13037-019-0201-9","article-title":"Variability in the timeliness of interventional radiology availability for angioembolization of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures: a prospective survey among U.S. level I trauma centers.","volume":"13","author":"Jarvis","year":"2019","journal-title":"Patient Saf Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi250937r17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"791","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.01.011","article-title":"Quality improvement project: improving interventional radiology response times for level I trauma embolization.","volume":"17","author":"Kim","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Am Coll Radiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi250937r18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jviscsurg.2015.01.003","article-title":"Is non-operative management of severe blunt splenic injury safer than embolization or surgery? results from a French prospective multicenter study.","volume":"152","author":"Chastang","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Visc Surg"},{"key":"zoi250937r19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2022.02.035","article-title":"Nonoperative management in blunt splenic trauma: can shock index predict failure?","volume":"276","author":"Senekjian","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Surg Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi250937r20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2016.03.043","article-title":"Nonoperative management is as effective as immediate splenectomy for adult patients with high-grade blunt splenic injury.","volume":"223","author":"Scarborough","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi250937r21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"810","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2011.06.041","article-title":"Nonsurgical management of blunt splenic injury: is it cost effective?","volume":"202","author":"Bruce","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi250937r22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8800","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-024-59420-w","article-title":"Comparative effectiveness of angioembolization versus open surgery in patients with blunt splenic injury.","volume":"14","author":"Suzuki","year":"2024","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi250937r23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1097\/TA.0000000000003833","article-title":"Recent trends in the management of isolated high-grade splenic injuries: a nationwide analysis.","volume":"94","author":"Aoki","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Trauma Acute Care Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi250937r24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2404","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-018-4494-0","article-title":"Nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma in patients with traumatic brain injury: feasibility and outcomes.","volume":"42","author":"Dhillon","year":"2018","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"zoi250937r25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2004.06.026","article-title":"Blunt splenic injury: operation versus angiographic embolization.","author":"Wahl","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"zoi250937r26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-020-05562-7","article-title":"Unstable hemodynamics is not always predictive of failed nonoperative management in blunt splenic injury.","author":"Liao","journal-title":"World J Surg"}],"container-title":["JAMA Network Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/articlepdf\/2839229\/huang_2025_oi_250937_1758037400.61074.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,23]],"date-time":"2025-09-23T15:00:16Z","timestamp":1758639616000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/fullarticle\/2839229"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,23]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,2]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2025.33266","relation":{},"ISSN":["2574-3805"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2574-3805","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,23]]}}}