{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,12]],"date-time":"2026-09-12T16:41:05Z","timestamp":1789231265224,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"12","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA Netw Open"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi251253-4\">\n                    <jats:title>Importance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The rate of follow-up after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is low despite guidelines recommending regular surveillance due to increased risk of stent-related complications, rupture, and death.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi251253-5\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To identify existing barriers and facilitators to patient follow-up adherence after EVAR to inform future interventions to improve follow-up adherence.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi251253-6\">\n                    <jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This qualitative study used purposive diversity sampling in a multisite, academic health system to interview patients who underwent elective or emergency EVAR between October 2019 and October 2021 and had varying follow-up patterns; health care professionals (HCPs), including vascular surgeons and advanced practice providers ([APPs] nurse practitioners and physician associates); and key clinical personnel, including administrative assistants, schedulers, nurses, and medical assistants with diverse backgrounds and experience with EVAR. Data were collected between December 2021 and February 2023. Data were analyzed between December 2022 and April 2025.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi251253-7\">\n                    <jats:title>Exposure<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Participants engaged in a single semistructured phone interview. Interview guides and thematic analysis were informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi251253-8\">\n                    <jats:title>Main Outcomes and Measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Barriers and facilitators to patient follow-up adherence after EVAR.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi251253-9\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The sample included 55 participants (25 patients [17 (68%) males], 16 HCPs [12 physicians and 4 APPs], and 14 key clinical personnel). Of the patients, 13 had complete follow-up and a median (IQR) age of 71.6 (63.8-75.6) years, and 12 had incomplete follow-up and a median (IQR) age of 72.0 (66.3-79.3) years. The HCPs had a median (range) 7 (3-16) years in practice, and key clinical personnel worked in their current position a median (range) 2 (1-4) years. Four main themes were identified during the qualitative analysis. In theme 1, patients\u2019 perceptions of follow-up importance were primarily affected by beliefs about immediate consequences and physical reinforcements (ie, symptoms). In theme 2, despite attempts by HCPs to provide education, patients\u2019 knowledge of anatomical concepts did not translate to better follow-up; however, explicit knowledge of clinical consequences (ie, rupture and death) did. In theme 3, patient memory and attention issues posed barriers to follow-up, but these barriers were partially mitigated by protocolization of follow-up processes (eg, appointment reminders, standardization of preoperative and postoperative resources, and optimization of discharge paperwork). In theme 4, social support and environmental circumstances, particularly transportation, were both substantial facilitators and barriers to follow-up.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi251253-10\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this qualitative study, patient focus on immediate outcomes after EVAR and memory and attention factors were important barriers to follow-up. However, recognition of explicit long-term consequences, presence of social support, and protocolization facilitated follow-up. Potential interventions to improve follow-up could include enhanced protocolization, a robust recall system to identify and contact patients with missed appointments, careful expansion of telemedicine, and transportation adjuncts.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2025.46327","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,2]],"date-time":"2025-12-02T16:00:21Z","timestamp":1764691221000},"page":"e2546327","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Barriers and Facilitators to Endovascular Aortic Repair Follow-Up"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Marissa C.","family":"Jarosinski","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lindsey A.","family":"Olivere","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jackie L.","family":"Barnes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Edith","family":"Tzeng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania"},{"name":"Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Services, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nathan L.","family":"Liang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kimberly J.","family":"Rak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Amanda R.","family":"Phillips","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Oregon Health and Vascular Institute, Eugene"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,2]]},"reference":[{"issue":"7","key":"zoi251253r1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2019.6578","article-title":"Comparison of outcomes in elective endovascular aortic repair vs open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.","volume":"2","author":"Salata","year":"2019","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi251253r2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2017.10.044","article-title":"The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm.","volume":"67","author":"Chaikof","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Vasc Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi251253r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2019.04.462","article-title":"Assessing trends, morbidity, and mortality in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with 9 years of data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.","volume":"71","author":"Melillo","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Vasc Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi251253r4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2021.01.065","article-title":"A population-based study of post-endovascular aortic repair rupture during 15 years.","volume":"74","author":"Andersson","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Vasc Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi251253r5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1625","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2016.10.106","article-title":"Endovascular aneurysm repair patients who are lost to follow-up have worse outcomes.","volume":"65","author":"Hicks","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Vasc Surg"},{"key":"zoi251253r6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.avsg.2021.09.047","article-title":"Any postoperative surveillance improves survival after endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.","volume":"80","author":"Phillips","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ann Vasc Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi251253r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2015.02.023","article-title":"Predictors of compliance with surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair and comparative survival outcomes.","volume":"62","author":"Wu","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Vasc Surg"},{"key":"zoi251253r8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1016\/j.avsg.2018.03.037","article-title":"Factors predicting noncompliance with follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair.","volume":"52","author":"Shiraev","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann Vasc Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi251253r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2014.06.006","article-title":"Follow-up compliance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries.","volume":"61","author":"Schanzer","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Vasc Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi251253r10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2014.07.003","article-title":"Adherence to postoperative surveillance guidelines after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair among Medicare beneficiaries.","volume":"61","author":"Garg","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Vasc Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi251253r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1186\/s13012-017-0605-9","article-title":"A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems.","volume":"12","author":"Atkins","year":"2017","journal-title":"Implement Sci"},{"key":"zoi251253r12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1186\/1748-5908-6-42","article-title":"The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions.","volume":"6","author":"Michie","year":"2011","journal-title":"Implement Sci"},{"key":"zoi251253r13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1186\/1748-5908-7-52","article-title":"Anesthesiologists\u2019 and surgeons\u2019 perceptions about routine pre-operative testing in low-risk patients: application of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify factors that influence physicians\u2019 decisions to order pre-operative tests.","volume":"7","author":"Patey","year":"2012","journal-title":"Implement Sci"},{"key":"zoi251253r14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.2147\/JMDH.S232888","article-title":"Bleeding management practices of Australian cardiac surgeons, anesthesiologists and perfusionists: a cross-sectional national survey incorporating the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and COM-B Model.","volume":"13","author":"Pearse","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Multidiscip Healthc"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi251253r15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzm042","article-title":"Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.","volume":"19","author":"Tong","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Qual Health Care"},{"key":"zoi251253r16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mex.2024.102938","article-title":"Identifying barriers and facilitators to follow-up after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR): qualitative study design and protocol.","volume":"13","author":"Phillips","year":"2024","journal-title":"MethodsX"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi251253r17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1007\/s10488-013-0528-y","article-title":"Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research.","volume":"42","author":"Palinkas","year":"2015","journal-title":"Adm Policy Ment Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi251253r19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0232076","article-title":"A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research.","volume":"15","author":"Guest","year":"2020","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi251253r20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2024.02.040","article-title":"Follow-up compliance in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at Veterans Affairs hospitals.","volume":"80","author":"Wolf","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Vasc Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi251253r22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2019.04.460","article-title":"Patient information sources when facing repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.","volume":"71","author":"Anderson","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Vasc Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi251253r23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejvs.2012.12.014","article-title":"Magnetic resonance imaging is more sensitive than computed tomography angiography for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review.","volume":"45","author":"Habets","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi251253r24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"454","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2022.01.079","article-title":"Longer follow-up intervals following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair are safe and appropriate after marked aneurysm sac regression.","volume":"76","author":"Andraska","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Vasc Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi251253r25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"779","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejvs.2021.01.017","article-title":"Type 2 endoleak with or without intervention and survival after endovascular aneurysm repair.","volume":"61","author":"Mulay","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi251253r26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2023.04.013","article-title":"High incidence of type 2 endoleak and low associated adverse events in the Vascular Quality Initiative linked to Medicare claims.","volume":"78","author":"Mansukhani","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Vasc Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi251253r27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2023.06.028","article-title":"Implications and late outcomes of persistent type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair.","volume":"78","author":"Cifuentes","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Vasc Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi251253r28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"906","DOI":"10.1007\/s11764-021-01152-1","article-title":"Current practice patterns and gaps in guideline-concordant breast cancer survivorship care.","volume":"17","author":"Brauer","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Cancer Surviv"},{"key":"zoi251253r29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1394","DOI":"10.1200\/GO.20.00180","article-title":"Follow-up care for breast and colorectal cancer across the globe: survey findings from 27 countries.","volume":"6","author":"Mollica","year":"2020","journal-title":"JCO Glob Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi251253r30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1216","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2022.02.058","article-title":"Epidemiology of age-, sex-, and race-specific hospitalizations for abdominal aortic aneurysms highlights gaps in current screening recommendations.","volume":"76","author":"Li","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Vasc Surg"},{"key":"zoi251253r18","unstructured":"Revision: NIH policy and guidelines on the inclusion of women and minorities as subjects in clinical research. National Institutes of Health. Updated July 17, 2025. Accessed September 26, 2025. https:\/\/grants.nih.gov\/grants\/guide\/notice-files\/NOT-OD-25-131.html"},{"key":"zoi251253r21","unstructured":"Health benefits: Veterans Transportation Program (VTP). U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Updated December 4, 2024. Accessed January 24, 2025. https:\/\/www.va.gov\/healthbenefits\/vtp\/"}],"container-title":["JAMA Network Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/articlepdf\/2842162\/jarosinski_2025_oi_251253_1763745944.28881.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,2]],"date-time":"2025-12-02T16:00:24Z","timestamp":1764691224000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/fullarticle\/2842162"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,2]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2025.46327","relation":{},"ISSN":["2574-3805"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2574-3805","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,2]]}}}