{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,30]],"date-time":"2026-10-30T21:47:30Z","timestamp":1793396850037,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":10,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"12","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA Netw Open"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi251268-4\">\n                    <jats:title>Importance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Public trust in scientists is essential for effective cancer communication and uptake of cancer control strategies. However, growing political polarization in the US may affect trust in scientific authorities.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi251268-5\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To determine whether political ideology is associated with trust in scientists as sources of cancer information, and whether individuals with more conservative political views would report lower levels of trust in scientists.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi251268-6\">\n                    <jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This survey study is a cross-sectional secondary analysis of the 2024 Health Information National Trends Survey, a nationally representative survey conducted by the National Cancer Institute. This population-based sample of noninstitutionalized US adults was collected by mail using a stratified random sampling frame from March to September 2024. Respondents were aged 18 years or older and demographically diverse. The sample was weighted to be representative of the US adult population.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi251268-7\">\n                    <jats:title>Exposure<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Political ideology measured on a 7-point bipolar scale from very liberal to very conservative.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi251268-8\">\n                    <jats:title>Main Outcome and Measure<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Trust in scientists for cancer information, dichotomized as high (some or a lot) vs low (not at all or a little). Survey-weighted logistic regression models were used to estimate associations.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi251268-9\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Of 7278 respondents (response rate, 27.3%), 6260 were included in the final analytic sample after excluding cases with missing data on the primary exposure or outcome. The mean age was 48.4 years (95% CI, 47.9-48.9 years). There were 52.1% men (95% CI, 51.2%-53.0%), and 35.1% reported a college degree (95% CI, 34.5%-35.7%). Most respondents (5320 individuals ) reported high trust in scientists as sources of cancer information (86.0%; 95% CI, 84.4%-87.5%). In adjusted logistic regression models, each 1-point increase toward greater conservatism was associated with a 25% decrease in the odds of reporting high trust (adjusted odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68-0.83). Adjusted estimated probabilities of high trust decreased across the political spectrum, from 93.7% those identifying as liberal (95% CI, 88.3%-96.7%) to 70.5% among those identifying as very conservative (95% CI, 63.9%-76.4%).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi251268-10\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this survey study of US adults, overall trust in scientists as sources of cancer information was high. However, a clear ideological gradient suggests the need for tailored messaging and trusted messengers to reach politically diverse audiences with evidence-based cancer information.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2025.46818","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,4]],"date-time":"2025-12-04T16:30:53Z","timestamp":1764865853000},"page":"e2546818","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Public Trust in Scientists for Cancer Information Across Political Ideologies in the US"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Christopher W.","family":"Wheldon","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Meghnaa","family":"Tallapragada","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Advertising & Public Relations, Klein College of Media and Communication, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Erika L.","family":"Thompson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Quantitative and Qualitative Health Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health San Antonio, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,4]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"zoi251268r1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1093\/poq\/nfz041","article-title":"Trends\u2014Americans\u2019 trust in science and scientists.","volume":"83","author":"Krause","year":"2019","journal-title":"Public Opin Q"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi251268r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0250123","article-title":"COVID-19 and vaccine hesitancy: a longitudinal study.","volume":"16","author":"Fridman","year":"2021","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi251268r4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2020.14423","article-title":"Attacks on public health officials during COVID-19.","volume":"324","author":"Mello","year":"2020","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"22","key":"zoi251268r6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2618","DOI":"10.1001\/archinte.165.22.2618","article-title":"Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey.","volume":"165","author":"Hesse","year":"2005","journal-title":"Arch Intern Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi251268r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28465","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-025-14115-8","article-title":"Science populism impacts perceptions of credibility across scientific professions.","volume":"15","author":"Lerner","year":"2025","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi251268r8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21841","article-title":"Evolution of community outreach and engagement at National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers, an evolving journey.","volume":"74","author":"Pohl","year":"2024","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi251268r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"751","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.90.5.751","article-title":"A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.","volume":"90","author":"Pettigrew","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Pers Soc Psychol"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi251268r10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1032","DOI":"10.1037\/a0013326","article-title":"The implications of death for health: a terror management health model for behavioral health promotion.","volume":"115","author":"Goldenberg","year":"2008","journal-title":"Psychol Rev"},{"key":"zoi251268r2","unstructured":"Tyson? A, Kennedy? B. Public trust in scientists and views on their role in policymaking. Pew Research Center. 2024. Accessed April 23, 2025. https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/science\/2024\/11\/14\/public-trust-in-scientists-and-views-on-their-role-in-policymaking\/"},{"key":"zoi251268r5","unstructured":"National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health. HINTS methodology reports. Accessed April 23, 2025. https:\/\/hints.cancer.gov\/data\/methodology-reports.aspx"}],"container-title":["JAMA Network Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/articlepdf\/2842306\/wheldon_2025_oi_251268_1764102561.8713.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,4]],"date-time":"2025-12-04T16:30:54Z","timestamp":1764865854000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/fullarticle\/2842306"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,4]]},"references-count":10,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2025.46818","relation":{"has-preprint":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.21203\/rs.3.rs-6656977\/v1","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["2574-3805"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2574-3805","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,4]]}}}