{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T06:26:43Z","timestamp":1792477603576,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA Netw Open"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260024-4\">\n                    <jats:title>Importance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Preliminary analyses have suggested that state-level abortion policy following\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Dobbs v Jackson Women\u2019s Health Organization<\/jats:italic>\n                      (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Dobbs<\/jats:italic>\n                      ) may affect the health care workforce, including residency applications.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260024-5\">\n                    <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      To assess disparities in the residency application rate to programs in abortion-restricted states compared with programs in nonrestricted states following the\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Dobbs<\/jats:italic>\n                      decision by gender of applicants across all medical specialties and to compare how these differences may vary by specialty.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260024-6\">\n                    <jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      This cross-sectional study with interrupted time-series analysis used anonymized program-level residency application data from the Association of American Medical Colleges Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) from 2019 to 2023. Residency programs across all medical specialties with complete application data across the study period were included. The application cycle immediately prior to the\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Dobbs<\/jats:italic>\n                      decision, 2020-2021, was the base year for analysis.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260024-7\">\n                    <jats:title>Exposures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      New or intensified state-level abortion restrictions enacted post-\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Dobbs<\/jats:italic>\n                      in June until October 2022, the 2023 ERAS submission deadline.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260024-8\">\n                    <jats:title>Main Outcomes and Measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The primary outcome was the disparity in application rates to programs between restricted states and nonrestricted states. The application rate was calculated as the number of applications to each program per 100\u202f000 total applications across all programs nationwide annually. Regression models explored the interaction between the exposure and application cycles, controlling for program fixed effects, program size, applicant degree type, and in-state applicants.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260024-9\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Among 4315 residency programs with 22\u202f447\u202f175 total applications (46.1% from women and 53.9% from men), the disparity in the application rate to programs in abortion-restricted states changed by \u22120.38 (95% CI, \u22120.70 to \u22120.05) among women and \u22120.56 (95% CI, \u22120.95 to \u22120.17) among men applying to residency, reflecting an absolute difference of \u22127833.2 (95% CI, \u221214\u202f429.7 to \u22121030.7) applications from women and \u221212\u202f789.2 (95% CI, \u221221\u202f695.9 to \u22123882.4) applications from men to programs in abortion-restricted states. Differences were greater among abortion-related specialties, including obstetrics and gynecology, family medicine, internal medicine, and emergency medicine (\u22121.17 [95% CI, \u22121.89 to \u22120.45] for women and \u22121.54 [95% CI, \u22122.39 to \u22120.69] for men), and decreased among the most competitive specialties (ie, dermatology; neurosurgery; orthopedics; ear, nose, and throat; and plastic surgery) (\u22120.02 [95% CI, \u22120.37 to 0.40] for women and \u22120.13 [95% CI, \u22120.44 to 0.18] for men).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260024-10\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      In this cross-sectional panel analysis of residency applications to 4315 programs, the\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Dobbs<\/jats:italic>\n                      decision was associated with a significant decrease in residency applications in abortion-restricted states compared with nonrestricted states among both women and men. These findings provide early evidence that\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Dobbs<\/jats:italic>\n                      may be associated with state-level disparities in the overall health care training pipeline and workforce.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2026.0286","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,2]],"date-time":"2026-03-02T16:00:35Z","timestamp":1772467235000},"page":"e260286","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["State-Level Disparities in Residency Applications After\n                    <i>Dobbs v Jackson Women\u2019s Health Organization<\/i>"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Anisha P.","family":"Ganguly","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill"},{"name":"Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anirban","family":"Basu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anna M.","family":"Morenz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson"},{"name":"Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,2]]},"reference":[{"issue":"20","key":"zoi260024r4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2041","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2022.20424","article-title":"Estimated travel time and spatial access to abortion facilities in the US before and after the Dobbs v Jackson Women\u2019s Health Decision.","volume":"328","author":"Rader","year":"2022","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260024r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamahealthforum.2024.0424","article-title":"Changes in permanent contraception procedures among young adults following the Dobbs decision.","volume":"5","author":"Ellison","year":"2024","journal-title":"JAMA Health Forum"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi260024r8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"784","DOI":"10.1001\/jamapediatrics.2024.0885","article-title":"Infant deaths after Texas\u2019 2021 ban on abortion in early pregnancy.","volume":"178","author":"Gemmill","year":"2024","journal-title":"JAMA Pediatr"},{"issue":"12","key":"zoi260024r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1364","DOI":"10.1001\/jamapediatrics.2024.4276","article-title":"National trends in infant mortality in the US after Dobbs.","volume":"178","author":"Singh","year":"2024","journal-title":"JAMA Pediatr"},{"key":"zoi260024r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ssmqr.2024.100483","article-title":"Sources of moral distress among obstetrician-gynecologists after Dobbs: a qualitative, multi-state study.","volume":"6","author":"Buchbinder","year":"2024","journal-title":"SSM Qual Res Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260024r12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2023.52109","article-title":"US obstetrician-gynecologists\u2019 perceived impacts of post-Dobbs v Jackson state abortion bans.","volume":"7","author":"Sabbath","year":"2024","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi260024r13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2024.8149","article-title":"Post-Dobbs decision changes in obstetrics and gynecology clinical workforce in states with abortion restrictions.","volume":"185","author":"Zhu","year":"2025","journal-title":"JAMA Intern Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260024r14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2023.55017","article-title":"Trends in obstetrics and gynecology residency applications in the year after abortion access changes.","volume":"7","author":"Hammoud","year":"2024","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260024r20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004832","article-title":"Projected implications of overturning Roe v Wade on abortion training in U.S. obstetrics and gynecology residency programs.","volume":"140","author":"Vinekar","year":"2022","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"zoi260024r21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2024.110808","article-title":"The impact of Dobbs v. Jackson on abortion training in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs: a qualitative study.","volume":"144","author":"Vachon","year":"2025","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260024r22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1136\/jme-2023-109190","article-title":"Abortion restrictions and medical residency applications.","volume":"51","author":"Mermin-Bunnell","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Med Ethics"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi260024r23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.11.005","article-title":"First-trimester surgical abortion practices: a survey of National Abortion Federation members.","volume":"79","author":"O\u2019Connell","year":"2009","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi260024r24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"492","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.07.011","article-title":"Second-trimester surgical abortion practices: a survey of National Abortion Federation members.","volume":"78","author":"O\u2019Connell","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260024r25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.xagr.2023.100186","article-title":"Abortion providers in the United States: expanding beyond obstetrics and gynecology.","volume":"3","author":"Sagar","year":"2023","journal-title":"AJOG Glob Rep"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260024r27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"680","DOI":"10.3122\/jabfm.2024.240005R1","article-title":"Primary care clinicians\u2019 interest in, and barriers to, medication abortion.","volume":"37","author":"Neufeld","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Am Board Fam Med"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi260024r28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"848","DOI":"10.1111\/acem.70002","article-title":"Abortion care in the emergency department: A national survey of emergency physicians\u2019 perspectives.","volume":"32","author":"Kempf","year":"2025","journal-title":"Acad Emerg Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260024r30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.15441\/ceem.23.118","article-title":"Challenges surrounding the emergency physician workforce and their impact on the Emergency Medicine Match.","volume":"10","author":"Bennett","year":"2023","journal-title":"Clin Exp Emerg Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"zoi260024r31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/haschl\/qxae162","article-title":"Lower obstetrician and gynecologist (OBGYN) supply in abortion-ban states, despite minimal state-level changes in the 2 years post-Dobbs.","volume":"2","author":"Strasser","year":"2024","journal-title":"Health Aff Sch"},{"key":"zoi260024r34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpubeco.2018.08.009","article-title":"The impacts of reduced access to abortion and family planning services on abortions, births, and contraceptive purchases.","volume":"167","author":"Fischer","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Public Econ"},{"key":"zoi260024r35","first-page":"131","article-title":"Aggravating inequalities: state regulation of abortion and contraception.","volume":"46","author":"Whelan","year":"2023","journal-title":"Harv J Law Gender"},{"issue":"7","key":"zoi260024r36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101387","article-title":"Impact of post-Dobbs abortion restrictions on maternal-fetal medicine physicians in the Southeast: a qualitative study.","volume":"6","author":"Schultz","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"issue":"17","key":"zoi260024r37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1695","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2022.18453","article-title":"Legal risks and ethical dilemmas for clinicians in the aftermath of Dobbs.","volume":"328","author":"Reingold","year":"2022","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"zoi260024r39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110181","article-title":"P012 - Men\u2019s abortion attitudes: results from an online survey of men in the US and Canada.","volume":"127","author":"Sweeney","year":"2023","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260024r40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2025.07.014","article-title":"Changes in the numbers of male and female obstetricians-gynecologists and their implications.","volume":"52","author":"Romero","year":"2025","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"zoi260024r1","unstructured":"Dobbs, State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health, et al v Jackson Women\u2019s Health Organization et al. Supreme Court of the United States. 2022. Accessed July 16, 2025. https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/21pdf\/19-1392_6j37.pdf"},{"key":"zoi260024r2","unstructured":"Abortion in the United States Dashboard. KFF. Accessed January 13, 2025. https:\/\/www.kff.org\/womens-health-policy\/dashboard\/abortion-in-the-u-s-dashboard\/"},{"key":"zoi260024r3","unstructured":"Forouzan? K, Guarnieri? I. State policy trends 2023: in the first full year since Roe fell, a tumultuous year for abortion and other reproductive health care. Guttmacher Institute. December 14, 2023. Accessed July 5, 2025. https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/2023\/12\/state-policy-trends-2023-first-full-year-roe-fell-tumultuous-year-abortion-and-other"},{"key":"zoi260024r5","unstructured":"#WeCount report, April 2022 to December 2024. Society of Family Planning. Accessed July 5, 2025. https:\/\/societyfp.org\/research\/wecount\/wecount-december-2024-data\/"},{"key":"zoi260024r6","unstructured":"Diep? K, Sanchez? BC, Ranji? U, Published? AS. Abortion trends before and after Dobbs. KFF. February 27, 2025. Accessed July 5, 2025. https:\/\/www.kff.org\/womens-health-policy\/issue-brief\/abortion-trends-before-and-after-dobbs\/"},{"key":"zoi260024r10","unstructured":"Mahoney? MH. The economic and workforce impact of restrictive abortion laws. Institute for Women\u2019s Policy Research. October 28, 2024. Accessed July 15, 2025. https:\/\/iwpr.org\/the-economic-and-workforce-impact-of-restrictive-abortion-laws\/"},{"key":"zoi260024r15","unstructured":"Orgera? K, Grover? A. States with abortion bans see continued decrease in U.S. MD senior residency applicants. AAMC. Accessed July 5, 2025. https:\/\/www.aamc.org\/about-us\/mission-areas\/health-care\/post-dobbs-2024"},{"key":"zoi260024r16","unstructured":"Table C4. Physician retention in state of residency training, by last completed GME Specialty. AAMC. Accessed July 15, 2025. https:\/\/www.aamc.org\/data-reports\/students-residents\/data\/report-residents\/2023\/table-c4-physician-retention-state-residency-training-last-completed-gme"},{"key":"zoi260024r17","unstructured":"Abortion at SCOTUS. Dobbs v. Jackson Women\u2019s Health - Table. KFF. Accessed July 6, 2025. https:\/\/www.kff.org\/womens-health-policy\/abortion-at-scotus-dobbs-v-jackson-womens-health\/"},{"key":"zoi260024r18","unstructured":"ERAS\u00ae Statistics. AAMC. Accessed July 6, 2025. https:\/\/www.aamc.org\/data-reports\/data\/eras-statistics-data"},{"key":"zoi260024r19","unstructured":"NRMP\u00ae releases results for 2025 main residency match. The National President Matching Program. March 21, 2025. Accessed July 6, 2025. https:\/\/www.nrmp.org\/match-data\/2025\/03\/nrmp-releases-results-for-2025-main-residency-match\/"},{"key":"zoi260024r26","unstructured":"Medication abortion accounted for 63% of all US abortions in 2023\u2014an increase from 53% in 2020. Guttmacher Institute. March 12, 2024. Accessed July 9, 2025. https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/2024\/03\/medication-abortion-accounted-63-all-us-abortions-2023-increase-53-2020"},{"key":"zoi260024r29","unstructured":"State of the Primary Care Workforce. 2024. Health Resources & Services Administration Health Workforce. 2025. Accessed July 9, 2025. https:\/\/bhw.hrsa.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/bureau-health-workforce\/data-research\/State-of-the-Primary-Care-Workforce-2025.pdf"},{"key":"zoi260024r32","unstructured":"Bahn? K, Kugler? A, Mahoney? M, Corley? D, McGrew? A. Linking reproductive health care access to labor market opportunities for women. Center for American Progress. November 2017. Accessed July 9, 2025. https:\/\/cdn.americanprogress.org\/content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/16060404\/110817_ReproRightsEconOpportunity-report1.pdf"},{"key":"zoi260024r33","unstructured":"State policy trends 2021: the worst year for abortion rights in almost half a century. Guttmacher Institute. December 16, 2021. Accessed July 9, 2025. https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/article\/2021\/12\/state-policy-trends-2021-worst-year-abortion-rights-almost-half-century"},{"key":"zoi260024r38","unstructured":"Public opinion on abortion. Pew Research Center. June 12, 2025. Accessed July 9, 2025. https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/religion\/fact-sheet\/public-opinion-on-abortion\/"},{"key":"zoi260024r41","unstructured":"DEI legislation tracker. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Accessed July 9, 2025. https:\/\/www.chronicle.com\/article\/here-are-the-states-where-lawmakers-are-seeking-to-ban-colleges-dei-efforts?emailConfirmed=true&supportSignUp=true&supportForgotPassword=true&email=bridgetabalch%40gmail.com&success=true&code=success&bc_nonce=e9515omkpvbsdjbz461amr"},{"key":"zoi260024r42","unstructured":"Dawson? L, Kates? J. Policy tracker: youth access to gender affirming care and state policy restrictions. KFF. Accessed July 9, 2025. https:\/\/www.kff.org\/other\/dashboard\/gender-affirming-care-policy-tracker\/"},{"key":"zoi260024r43","unstructured":"After Roe fell: US abortion laws by state. Center for Reproductive Rights. Accessed January 13, 2025. https:\/\/reproductiverights.org\/maps\/abortion-laws-by-state\/"}],"container-title":["JAMA Network Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/articlepdf\/2845670\/ganguly_2026_oi_260024_1774274587.27613.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,26]],"date-time":"2026-03-26T15:00:28Z","timestamp":1774537228000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/fullarticle\/2845670"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,2]]},"references-count":43,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,2]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2026.0286","relation":{},"ISSN":["2574-3805"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2574-3805","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,2]]}}}