{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,11]],"date-time":"2026-07-11T04:27:20Z","timestamp":1783744040235,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":47,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA Netw Open"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260471-4\">\n                    <jats:title>Importance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Noneconomic damage caps, a form of medical malpractice law, remain controversial, as several states have enacted such laws since 2010, whereas others have repealed them. The clinical consequences of repealing these caps are poorly understood, and understanding these associations can inform the ongoing debate about medical malpractice reform.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260471-5\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To examine whether repealing noneconomic damage caps is associated with changes in maternal care and infant health outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260471-6\">\n                    <jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This cross-sectional study adopted a difference-in-differences design, comparing between 2 treated states (Georgia and Illinois) that repealed their noneconomic damage caps in 2008 to 2009 and 16 control states that retained their caps during the entire study period between 2005 and 2019. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention All-County Natality Files were used to estimate multivariate linear models, controlling for maternal and infant characteristics and county-level and state-level covariates. Estimates were stratified by county rurality and birth risk conditions. Data were analyzed from April 1, 2024, to April 9, 2026.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260471-7\">\n                    <jats:title>Main Outcomes and Measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The primary outcomes were 4 measures of maternal care and procedures (physician-attended births, inductions, cesarean delivery births, and prenatal visits) and 3 birth outcomes (low Apgar score, low birth weight, and preterm births). Difference-in-differences models with 2-way fixed effects were estimated, and linear models for the study outcomes were specified.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260471-8\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The sample included 20\u202f426\u202f267 live births (mean [SD] gestational age, 38.55 [1.35] weeks). Compared with their counterparts in the control states, rural counties in the treated states experienced a statistically significant increase of 2.92 percentage points (pp) (95% CI, 1.40-4.50 pp; Bonferroni-adjusted\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u2009.01) in physician-attended births. The increase held for both low-risk (3.10 pp; 95% CI, 1.33-4.90 pp;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u2009.004) and high-risk (2.56 pp; 95% CI, 0.77-4.34 pp;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u2009.01) births in rural counties. There was no difference between treated and control states for physician-attended births overall or in urban counties. No statistically significant associations were observed for cesarean deliveries, inductions, prenatal visits, or infant health outcomes after adjusting for multiple comparisons.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260471-9\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this cross-sectional study of 20\u202f426\u202f267 live births across 18 states, repealing noneconomic damage caps was associated with increased physician-attended births in rural counties but was not associated with statistically significant changes in other maternal care measures or infant health outcomes. These findings suggest that increased liability risk after repealing the caps may shift the composition of birth attendants in resource-constrained settings without demonstrable changes in infant health.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2026.16654","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,4]],"date-time":"2026-06-04T15:30:36Z","timestamp":1780587036000},"page":"e2616654","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Changes in Maternal Care and Infant Health After Noneconomic Damage Cap Repeals"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Yuji","family":"Mizushima","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts"},{"name":"RAND, Santa Monica, California"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christopher","family":"Whaley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anjali","family":"Kaimal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hao","family":"Yu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,4]]},"reference":[{"issue":"S2","key":"zoi260471r1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S143","DOI":"10.1086\/519466","article-title":"Does malpractice liability keep the doctor away? evidence from tort reform damage caps.","volume":"36","author":"Matsa","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Legal Stud"},{"key":"zoi260471r2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/j.irle.2015.01.005","article-title":"Tort reform and physician labor supply: a review of the evidence.","volume":"42","author":"Helland","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Rev Law Econ"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260471r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1093\/aler\/ahw009","article-title":"Damage caps and the labor supply of physicians: evidence from the third reform wave.","volume":"18","author":"Paik","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am Law Econ Rev"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260471r4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.2307\/2946682","article-title":"Do doctors practice defensive medicine?","volume":"111","author":"Kessler","year":"1996","journal-title":"Q J Econ"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260471r5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1016\/S0047-2727(01)00124-4","article-title":"Malpractice law and health care reform: optimal liability policy in an era of managed care.","volume":"84","author":"Kessler","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Public Econ"},{"key":"zoi260471r6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhealeco.2016.11.001","article-title":"Damage caps and defensive medicine, revisited.","volume":"51","author":"Paik","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Health Econ"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260471r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhealeco.2008.12.006","article-title":"Is there empirical evidence for \u201cdefensive medicine\u201d? a reassessment.","volume":"28","author":"Sloan","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Health Econ"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260471r8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1111\/rmir.12216","article-title":"Do noneconomic damage caps reduce medical malpractice insurance premiums? evidence from North Carolina.","volume":"25","author":"Yu","year":"2022","journal-title":"Risk Manag Insur Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260471r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1257\/pol.20180167","article-title":"Defensive medicine: evidence from military immunity.","volume":"11","author":"Frakes","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am Econ J Econ Policy"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260471r10","first-page":"1","article-title":"Is better patient safety associated with less malpractice activity? evidence from California.","volume":"1","author":"Greenberg","year":"2011","journal-title":"Rand Health Q"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260471r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1162\/AJHE_a_00069","article-title":"The association between patient safety indicators and medical malpractice risk: evidence from Florida and Texas.","volume":"3","author":"Black","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Health Econ"},{"issue":"19","key":"zoi260471r12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2024","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsa054479","article-title":"Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation.","volume":"354","author":"Studdert","year":"2006","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"zoi260471r13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhealeco.2014.08.002","article-title":"The impact of tort reform on intensity of treatment: evidence from heart patients.","volume":"39","author":"Avraham","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Health Econ"},{"key":"zoi260471r14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpubeco.2016.09.002","article-title":"Does medical malpractice law improve health care quality?","volume":"143","author":"Frakes","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Public Econ"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260471r15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1539-6975.2009.01294.x","article-title":"The effects of tort reform on medical malpractice insurers\u2019 ultimate losses.","volume":"76","author":"Born","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Risk Insur"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260471r16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1002\/hec.3283","article-title":"Medical malpractice damage caps and provider reimbursement.","volume":"26","author":"Friedson","year":"2017","journal-title":"Health Econ"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi260471r17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2018","DOI":"10.1111\/1475-6773.12789","article-title":"The impact of state medical malpractice reform on individual-level health care expenditures.","volume":"52","author":"Yu","year":"2017","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"key":"zoi260471r18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhealeco.2022.102638","article-title":"The deterrent effect of tort law: evidence from medical malpractice reform.","volume":"84","author":"Zabinski","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Health Econ"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260471r19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1017\/S1744133120000432","article-title":"Physician behaviour, malpractice risk and defensive medicine: an investigation of cesarean deliveries.","volume":"17","author":"Mushinski","year":"2022","journal-title":"Health Econ Policy Law"},{"issue":"7","key":"zoi260471r20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsa1012370","article-title":"Malpractice risk according to physician specialty.","volume":"365","author":"Jena","year":"2011","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260471r21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"352","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2019.21411","article-title":"Malpractice liability and health care quality: a review.","volume":"323","author":"Mello","year":"2020","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260471r24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2005-0999","article-title":"Adolescent pregnancy: current trends and issues.","volume":"116","author":"Klein","year":"2005","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"issue":"17","key":"zoi260471r25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1113","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199504273321701","article-title":"Association of young maternal age with adverse reproductive outcomes.","volume":"332","author":"Fraser","year":"1995","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"19","key":"zoi260471r26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1927","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMp048087","article-title":"Advanced maternal age: how old is too old?","volume":"351","author":"Heffner","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260471r27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1162\/qjec.2008.123.2.795","article-title":"First do no harm? tort reform and birth outcomes.","volume":"123","author":"Currie","year":"2008","journal-title":"Q J Econ"},{"key":"zoi260471r28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.econlet.2019.108626","article-title":"A re-examination of the effects of tort reforms on obstetrical procedures and health outcomes.","volume":"184","author":"Malak","year":"2019","journal-title":"Econ Lett"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260471r30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1257\/pol.20120179","article-title":"Income, the earned income tax credit, and infant health.","volume":"7","author":"Hoynes","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am Econ J Econ Policy"},{"issue":"11","key":"zoi260471r31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamapediatrics.2014.2365","article-title":"Associations of tobacco control policies with birth outcomes.","volume":"168","author":"Hawkins","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA Pediatr"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260471r32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.1177\/0003122410374086","article-title":"Effects of prenatal poverty on infant health: state earned income tax credits and birth weight.","volume":"75","author":"Strully","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am Sociol Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260471r33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"444","DOI":"10.1177\/10775587221126777","article-title":"Toward a uniform classification of nurse practitioner scope of practice laws.","volume":"80","author":"McMichael","year":"2023","journal-title":"Med Care Res Rev"},{"key":"zoi260471r34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhealeco.2017.07.004","article-title":"Competitive effects of scope of practice restrictions: public health or public harm?","volume":"55","author":"Markowitz","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Health Econ"},{"key":"zoi260471r35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhealeco.2023.102817","article-title":"Health outcomes and provider choice under full practice authority for certified nurse-midwives.","volume":"92","author":"Hoehn-Velasco","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Health Econ"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260471r36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"839","DOI":"10.1111\/caje.12661","article-title":"Reworking wild bootstrap-based inference for clustered errors.","volume":"56","author":"Webb","year":"2023","journal-title":"Can J Econ"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260471r37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.3368\/jhr.50.2.317","article-title":"A practitioner\u2019s guide to cluster-robust inference.","volume":"50","author":"Cameron","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Hum Resour"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260471r38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1111\/ectj.12107","article-title":"The wild bootstrap for few (treated) clusters.","volume":"21","author":"MacKinnon","year":"2018","journal-title":"Econom J"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260471r39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1515\/jtl-2019-0028","article-title":"Shifting liability with licensing: an empirical analysis of medical malpractice and scope-of-practice laws.","volume":"12","author":"McMichael","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Tort Law"},{"issue":"12","key":"zoi260471r42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2223","DOI":"10.1002\/hec.70032","article-title":"The repeal of noneconomic damage caps and medical malpractice insurance premiums.","volume":"34","author":"Mizushima","year":"2025","journal-title":"Health Econ"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260471r43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2024.3194","article-title":"Preterm birth risk and maternal nativity, ethnicity, and race.","volume":"7","author":"Barreto","year":"2024","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi260471r44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"511","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2017.08.010","article-title":"Racial and ethnic differences in preterm birth: a complex, multifactorial problem.","volume":"41","author":"Manuck","year":"2017","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260471r46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1111\/jels.12208","article-title":"Damage caps and defensive medicine: reexamination with patient-level data.","volume":"16","author":"Moghtaderi","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Empir Leg Stud"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi260471r47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcjq.2017.02.004","article-title":"Relationship between state malpractice environment and quality of health care in the United States.","volume":"43","author":"Bilimoria","year":"2017","journal-title":"Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf"},{"key":"zoi260471r22","unstructured":"Avraham? R. Database of state tort law reforms (7.1). The University of Texas at Austin School of Law. 2021. Accessed April 24, 2026. https:\/\/law.utexas.edu\/faculty\/ravraham\/dstlr.php"},{"key":"zoi260471r23","unstructured":"National Center for Health Statistics. 2013 NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties. April 2014. Accessed April 24, 2026. https:\/\/www.govinfo.gov\/content\/pkg\/GOVPUB-HE20_6200-PURL-gpo60805\/pdf\/GOVPUB-HE20_6200-PURL-gpo60805.pdf"},{"key":"zoi260471r29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ziedan? E, Kaestner? R. Effect of prescription opioids and prescription opioid control policies on infant health. National Bureau of Economic Research. February 2020. Accessed April 24, 2026. https:\/\/www.nber.org\/papers\/w26749","DOI":"10.3386\/w26749"},{"key":"zoi260471r40","unstructured":"Kane? CK. Physician practice characteristics in 2024: private practices account for less than half of physicians in most specialties. American Medical Association. 2025. Accessed April 24, 2026. https:\/\/www.ama-assn.org\/system\/files\/2024-prp-pp-characteristics.pdf"},{"key":"zoi260471r41","unstructured":"Johnson? B. Analysis of California\u2019s physician-supervision requirement for certified nurse midwives. Legislative Analyst\u2019s Office. March 11, 2020. Accessed April 24, 2026. https:\/\/lao.ca.gov\/Publications\/Report\/4197"},{"key":"zoi260471r45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chatterji? P, Li? S, Marschke? GR. Malpractice reform and the sorting of new physicians by medical human capital. National Bureau of Economic Research. March 2018. Accessed April 24, 2026. https:\/\/www.nber.org\/papers\/w24401","DOI":"10.3386\/w24401"}],"container-title":["JAMA Network Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/articlepdf\/2849876\/mizushima_2026_oi_260471_1779986528.46387.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,4]],"date-time":"2026-06-04T15:30:42Z","timestamp":1780587042000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/fullarticle\/2849876"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,4]]},"references-count":47,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2026.16654","relation":{},"ISSN":["2574-3805"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2574-3805","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,4]]}}}