{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,17]],"date-time":"2026-10-17T12:18:48Z","timestamp":1792239528252,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA Netw Open"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260544-4\">\n                    <jats:title>Importance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Following the\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Dobbs v Jackson Women\u2019s Health Organization<\/jats:italic>\n                      decision, states with abortion bans have experienced increased maternal morbidity and mortality. However, the associations of these restrictions with abortion-adjacent care\u2014medical care directly affected by or overlapping with abortion, such as management of early pregnancy loss (EPL), ectopic pregnancy, and other pregnancy complications\u2014are not well described.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260544-5\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To examine how state-level abortion bans are associated with abortion-adjacent clinical care among physicians from different medical specialties.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260544-6\">\n                    <jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This qualitative study was conducted between May 13, 2024, and May 23, 2025, using purposive and snowball sampling. Participants included physicians from emergency medicine, family medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology specialties practicing in 9 states with total abortion bans. Semistructured interviews were conducted via videoconference and analyzed using an inductive thematic approach with dual independent coding.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260544-7\">\n                    <jats:title>Exposure<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Medical practice in a state with an abortion ban.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260544-8\">\n                    <jats:title>Main Outcomes and Measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Participant-reported experiences with clinical decision-making, care delivery, counseling practices, and professional responsibilities in the context of abortion bans.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260544-9\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 40 physicians (18 in obstetrics and gynecology, 8 in family medicine, and 14 in emergency medicine) across 9 states participated, 30 (75.0%) of whom were female. Mean (SD) length of time in practice was 7.9 (6.1) years. Six major themes emerged: (1) delays in care and deviations from standard practice for EPL, ectopic pregnancy, molar pregnancy, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, and maternal comorbidities; (2) ambiguity and fear among physicians; (3) loss of patient autonomy and shared decision-making; (4) erosion of trust in the patient-physician relationship; (5) placement of physicians into new gatekeeping roles; and (6) increased health care system burdens. Physicians described requiring additional confirmatory testing, seeking institutional approval even for emergent life-saving interventions, and being forced to determine which patients were sick enough to receive medically indicated care.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260544-10\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this qualitative study of the consequences of abortion bans across multiple medical specialties, abortion bans were associated with disrupted clinical care far beyond what is traditionally categorized as abortion, with treatment delays that endanger patients, undermined patient autonomy and physician-patient trust, and with new gatekeeping roles for physicians. These restrictions shifted medical decision-making from clinical judgment and patient values toward legal risk mitigation, with potential long-term consequences including exacerbation of health care inequities and compromised ability to provide safe and effective care for pregnant patients.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2026.19644","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,22]],"date-time":"2026-06-22T15:30:56Z","timestamp":1782142256000},"page":"e2619644","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Abortion Bans and Pregnancy-Related Care Across Physician Specialties"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Sophia","family":"Landay","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emily","family":"Newton-Hoe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Subasri","family":"Narasimhan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"UCLA Center on Reproductive Health, Law, and Policy, Los Angeles, California"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anitra","family":"Beasley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jessica","family":"Adkins","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sara","family":"Neill","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,22]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2, pt 1","key":"zoi260544r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31823fe923","article-title":"The comparative safety of legal induced abortion and childbirth in the United States.","volume":"119","author":"Raymond","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260544r4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2015.10.001","article-title":"Side effects, physical health consequences, and mortality associated with abortion and birth after an unwanted pregnancy.","volume":"26","author":"Gerdts","year":"2016","journal-title":"Womens Health Issues"},{"issue":"9","key":"zoi260544r6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1290","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2017.304247r","article-title":"Socioeconomic outcomes of women who receive and women who are denied wanted abortions in the United States.","volume":"112","author":"Foster","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260544r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1186\/s12916-014-0144-z","article-title":"Risk of violence from the man involved in the pregnancy after receiving or being denied an abortion.","volume":"12","author":"Roberts","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260544r8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1001\/jamapsychiatry.2016.3478","article-title":"Women\u2019s mental health and well-being 5 years after receiving or being denied an abortion: a prospective, longitudinal cohort study.","volume":"74","author":"Biggs","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA Psychiatry"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260544r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2023.52109","article-title":"US obstetrician-gynecologists\u2019 perceived impacts of post-Dobbs v Jackson state abortion bans.","volume":"7","author":"Sabbath","year":"2024","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260544r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2025.2498","article-title":"Experiences of obstetrician-gynecologists providing pregnancy care after Dobbs.","volume":"8","author":"Cutler","year":"2025","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"key":"zoi260544r12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2024.116912","article-title":"Our hands are tied: abortion bans and hesitant medicine.","volume":"350","author":"Lilly","year":"2024","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"key":"zoi260544r14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109956","article-title":"Exploring the emotional costs of abortion travel in the United States due to legal restriction.","volume":"120","author":"Kimport","year":"2023","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"10","key":"zoi260544r15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1025","DOI":"10.1001\/jamapsychiatry.2025.1376","article-title":"US abortion restrictions and the neuropsychiatric health of pregnant individuals and families.","volume":"82","author":"Osborne","year":"2025","journal-title":"JAMA Psychiatry"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260544r16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"462","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chest.2025.03.008","article-title":"US physicians\u2019 perceived impacts of abortion bans in pulmonary and critical care medicine.","volume":"168","author":"Hauschildt","year":"2025","journal-title":"Chest"},{"issue":"10","key":"zoi260544r17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1200\/OP.2024.20.10_suppl.43","article-title":"Perceived impact of abortion access on quality of cancer care and on future practice location decisions among oncology fellow physicians: an ASCO State of Cancer Care in America study.","volume":"20","author":"Kirkwood","year":"2024","journal-title":"JCO Oncol Pract"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi260544r18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMp2207423","article-title":"A Preview of the dangerous future of abortion bans\u2014Texas Senate Bill 8.","volume":"387","author":"Arey","year":"2022","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"11","key":"zoi260544r19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1887","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2025.308224","article-title":"Blood transfusions for pregnancy loss in Texas before and after abortion bans, 2017-2023.","volume":"115","author":"Nagle","year":"2025","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"zoi260544r20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.111043","article-title":"Not actively dying: an inductive categorization of obstetric cases negatively affected by post-Dobbs abortion bans.","volume":"151","author":"Kimport","year":"2025","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260544r21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2023.03.038","article-title":"The association between abortion restrictions and patient-centered care for early pregnancy loss at US obstetrics-gynecology residency programs.","volume":"229","author":"Phillips","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"zoi260544r22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1696","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2021.306396","article-title":"State abortion policies and maternal death in the United States, 2015-2018.","volume":"111","author":"Vilda","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi260544r23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"496","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.03.018","article-title":"The association between state-level abortion restrictions and maternal mortality in the United States, 1995-2017.","volume":"104","author":"Addante","year":"2021","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"9","key":"zoi260544r24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1673","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2021.306375","article-title":"Racial and ethnic disparities in maternal mortality in the United States using enhanced vital records, 2016-2017.","volume":"111","author":"MacDorman","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260544r25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1139","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-021-07165-x","article-title":"Racial\/ethnic and educational inequities in restrictive abortion policy variation and adverse birth outcomes in the United States.","volume":"21","author":"Redd","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"35","key":"zoi260544r26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"762","DOI":"10.15585\/mmwr.mm6835a3","article-title":"Racial\/ethnic disparities in pregnancy-related deaths\u2014United States, 2007-2016.","volume":"68","author":"Petersen","year":"2019","journal-title":"MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi260544r27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"492","DOI":"10.1370\/afm.3183","article-title":"Impact of state abortion policies on family medicine practice and training after Dobbs v Jackson Women\u2019s Health Organization.","volume":"22","author":"Roper","year":"2024","journal-title":"Ann Fam Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260544r28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1186\/s12939-025-02665-2","article-title":"Reproductive coercion, medical mistrust, and Black women\u2019s health from the antebellum period to the 21st century.","volume":"24","author":"Adekunle","year":"2025","journal-title":"Int J Equity Health"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260544r29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"779","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000005331","article-title":"Historical primer on obstetrics and gynecology health inequities in America: a narrative review of four events.","volume":"142","author":"Nnoli","year":"2023","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260544r30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e91","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002560","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin No. 193: tubal ectopic pregnancy.","volume":"131","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists\u2019 Committee on Practice Bulletins\u2014Gynecology","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi260544r31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1149","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hoc.2024.07.001","article-title":"Diagnosis and management of molar pregnancies.","volume":"38","author":"Braga","year":"2024","journal-title":"Hematol Oncol Clin North Am"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260544r32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000005009","article-title":"Policy changes as a context for moral injury development in the wake of Dobbs v Jackson Women\u2019s Health Organization.","volume":"141","author":"Desai","year":"2023","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"zoi260544r13","volume-title":"Care Post-Roe: Documenting Cases of Poor-Quality Care Since the Dobbs Decision","author":"Grossman","year":"2023"},{"key":"zoi260544r1","unstructured":"State bans on abortion throughout pregnancy. The Guttmacher Institute. Updated April 27, 2026. Accessed May 5, 2026. https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/state-policy\/explore\/state-policies-abortion-bans"},{"key":"zoi260544r2","unstructured":"McCann? A, Schoenfeld? A. Tracking abortion bans across the country. New York Times. Updated May 4, 2026. Accessed May 5, 2026. https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2024\/us\/abortion-laws-roe-v-wade.html"},{"key":"zoi260544r5","unstructured":"Maternal mortality in the United States after abortion bans: mothers living in abortion ban states at significantly higher risk of death during pregnancy and childbirth. Gender Equity Policy Institute. April 2025. Accessed August 28, 2025. https:\/\/thegepi.org\/maternal-mortality-abortion-bans\/"},{"key":"zoi260544r10","unstructured":"Heisler? M, Arey? W, Green? L, Shah? P, Klempnauer Miller? H. Cascading harms: how abortion bans lead to discriminatory care across medical specialties. Physicians for Human Rights. September 30, 2025. Accessed November 18, 2025. https:\/\/phr.org\/our-work\/resources\/cascading-harms-how-abortion-bans-lead-to-discriminatory-care-across-medical-specialties\/"}],"container-title":["JAMA Network Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/articlepdf\/2850560\/landay_2026_oi_260544_1781275432.87733.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,22]],"date-time":"2026-06-22T15:31:02Z","timestamp":1782142262000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/fullarticle\/2850560"}},"subtitle":["A Qualitative Study"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,22]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2026.19644","relation":{},"ISSN":["2574-3805"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2574-3805","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,22]]}}}