{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,4]],"date-time":"2026-09-04T16:16:43Z","timestamp":1788538603927,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":54,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"9","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA Netw Open"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260850-4\">\n                    <jats:title>Importance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Previous research has found associations between abortion policies and infant health. Differing methods complicate understanding which abortion policies matter for infant health.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260850-5\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To examine associations between multiple state-level abortion policies and infant health.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260850-6\">\n                    <jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This retrospective cohort study obtained birth certificate data and cohort-linked birth\u2013infant death files and used logistic regression, adjusting for individual and state controls, state-year combination fixed effects, state-specific time trends, and standard errors clustered by state, with sensitivity analyses to identify robust findings. Participants included liveborn singleton births in the US from 2005 to 2022. Data were analyzed from January 2025, to June 7, 2026.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260850-7\">\n                    <jats:title>Exposures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Eleven abortion policies.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260850-8\">\n                    <jats:title>Main Outcomes and Measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The primary outcomes were low birth weight (&amp;amp;lt;2500 g), preterm birth (&amp;amp;lt;37 weeks), low Apgar score (&amp;amp;lt;7), and infant death.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260850-9\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Among 64\u202f789\u202f079 births, the mean (SD) maternal age was 28.2 (6.0) years; 6.5% (n\u2009=\u20094\u202f193\u202f951) of neonates were low birth weight, 10.3% (n\u2009=\u20096\u202f664\u202f535) were preterm, 1.8% (n\u2009=\u20091\u202f142\u202f835) had a low Apgar score, and 0.53% (n\u2009=\u2009341\u202f399) died; 1.6% (n\u2009=\u20091\u202f006\u202f123) of mothers had no prenatal care, and 23.6% (n\u2009=\u200914\u202f449\u202f109) had late prenatal care. Waiting periods (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.97 [95% CI, 0.96-0.99]) and medication abortion in-person requirements (aOR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99]) were associated with decreased low birth weight. For clinician-type qualifications, ambiguity regarding advanced practice clinician provision was associated with decreased infant deaths (aOR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.58-0.83]), physician-only requirements were associated with increased low birth weight (aOR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.05]) and preterm birth (aOR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.02-1.07]), and advance practice clinician provision of medication abortion only was associated with increased low birth weight (aOR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.05]). The 6-week, fetal heartbeat bans were associated with increased preterm births (aOR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.00-1.07]); the 20-week, fetal pain bans were associated with increased low Apgar score (aOR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.06-1.38]); ultrasonography information requirements were associated with increased low Apgar scores (aOR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.02-1.24]); private insurance bans were associated with increased preterm births (aOR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.01-1.07]); and hospital transfer agreement requirements were associated with increased low birth weight (aOR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.00-1.03]) and increased preterm births (aOR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.00-1.03]).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260850-10\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this cohort study of US births, 5 abortion policies were associated with multiple increased adverse infant health outcomes, whereas 2 were associated with decreased low birth weight. Findings suggest multiple types of abortion policies\u2014and not only total abortion bans\u2014are relevant for infant health.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2026.30990","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,4]],"date-time":"2026-09-04T15:37:11Z","timestamp":1788536231000},"page":"e2630990","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["State-Level Abortion Policies and Infant Health Outcomes"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Sarah C. M.","family":"Roberts","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Claudia","family":"Zaugg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lauren","family":"Ralph","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,4]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260850r1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2023.","author":"Osterman","year":"2025","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"issue":"7","key":"zoi260850r2","first-page":"1","article-title":"Infant mortality in the United States, 2023: data from the period linked Birth\/Infant Death File.","author":"Ely","year":"2025","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260850r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1257\/pol.20140224","article-title":"Why is infant mortality higher in the United States than in Europe?","volume":"8","author":"Chen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am Econ J Econ Policy"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260850r4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1117","DOI":"10.1186\/s12889-021-11185-x","article-title":"Trends in infants born at low birthweight and disparities by maternal race and education from 2003 to 2018 in the United States.","volume":"21","author":"Pollock","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Public Health"},{"issue":"29","key":"zoi260850r5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1126\/sciadv.aba5908","article-title":"The evolution of infant mortality inequality in the United States, 1960-2016.","volume":"6","author":"Turner","year":"2020","journal-title":"Sci Adv"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260850r6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1097\/EDE.0000000000001865","article-title":"State-level payday loan bans and preterm births in the US, 2000-2019.","volume":"36","author":"Gailey","year":"2025","journal-title":"Epidemiology"},{"issue":"12","key":"zoi260850r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3646","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwaf211","article-title":"Impacts of the 2021 child tax credit advance monthly payments on birth outcomes in the United States: a natural experiment.","volume":"194","author":"Margerison","year":"2025","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260850r8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2023.9646","article-title":"Association of state-level tax policy and infant mortality in the United States, 1996-2019.","volume":"6","author":"Junior","year":"2023","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260850r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"454","DOI":"10.1093\/pubmed\/fdaf063","article-title":"Impact of local- and state-level tobacco control policies on prenatal smoking and birth outcomes in the United States, 2005-2018.","volume":"47","author":"Hawkins","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Public Health (Oxf)"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260850r10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1809","DOI":"10.1007\/s11113-022-09714-6","article-title":"The liberalization of cannabis possession laws and birth outcomes: a state-level fixed effects analysis, 2003-2019.","volume":"41","author":"Sennott","year":"2022","journal-title":"Popul Res Policy Rev"},{"key":"zoi260850r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.15288\/jsad.25-00305","article-title":"Alcohol sales taxes are associated with reduced preterm birth and low birthweight in the United States.","author":"Subbaraman","year":"2026","journal-title":"J Stud Alcohol Drugs"},{"key":"zoi260850r12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ssmph.2016.03.007","article-title":"Reproductive justice & preventable deaths: state funding, family planning, abortion, and infant mortality, US 1980-2010.","volume":"2","author":"Krieger","year":"2016","journal-title":"SSM Popul Health"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260850r13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2021.4482","article-title":"Analysis of state-level immigrant policies and preterm births by race\/ethnicity among women born in the US and women born outside the US.","volume":"4","author":"Sudhinaraset","year":"2021","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"key":"zoi260850r14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2017.04.024","article-title":"Political gender inequality and infant mortality in the United States, 1990-2012.","volume":"182","author":"Homan","year":"2017","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"zoi260850r15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2999","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2006.07.013","article-title":"Women\u2019s status and child well-being: a state-level analysis.","volume":"63","author":"Koenen","year":"2006","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"issue":"13","key":"zoi260850r16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2077","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.18164","article-title":"Association of restricted abortion access with maternal and infant health by maternal nativity: a difference-in-differences analysis.","volume":"132","author":"Adkins","year":"2025","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"15","key":"zoi260850r17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1315","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2024.28517","article-title":"US abortion bans and infant mortality.","volume":"333","author":"Gemmill","year":"2025","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi260850r18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"784","DOI":"10.1001\/jamapediatrics.2024.0885","article-title":"Infant deaths after Texas\u2019 2021 ban on abortion in early pregnancy.","volume":"178","author":"Gemmill","year":"2024","journal-title":"JAMA Pediatr"},{"key":"zoi260850r19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhealeco.2024.102938","article-title":"The maternal and infant health consequences of restricted access to abortion in the United States.","volume":"98","author":"Gardner","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Health Econ"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260850r20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0226004","article-title":"Complex situations: economic insecurity, mental health, and substance use among pregnant women who consider\u2014but do not have\u2014abortions.","volume":"15","author":"Roberts","year":"2020","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260850r22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1363\/48e8216","article-title":"Utah\u2019s 72-hour waiting period for abortion: experiences among a clinic-based sample of women.","volume":"48","author":"Roberts","year":"2016","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260850r23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.1007\/s13178-018-0359-4","article-title":"Consideration of and reasons for not obtaining abortion among women entering prenatal care in Southern Louisiana and Baltimore, Maryland.","volume":"16","author":"Roberts","year":"2019","journal-title":"Sex Res Soc Policy"},{"issue":"7","key":"zoi260850r24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"691","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2020.24096","article-title":"Changes in abortion in Texas following an executive order ban during the coronavirus pandemic.","volume":"325","author":"White","year":"2021","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi260850r25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"496","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.07.006","article-title":"Change in abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas.","volume":"90","author":"Grossman","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"9","key":"zoi260850r26","first-page":"1687","article-title":"Denial of abortion because of provider gestational age limits in the United States.","volume":"104","author":"Upadhyay","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"zoi260850r27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpubeco.2024.105124","article-title":"The effects of post-Dobbs abortion bans on fertility.","author":"Dench","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Public Econ"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260850r30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1080\/07399332.2013.841699","article-title":"Pro-choice versus pro-life: the relationship between state abortion policy and child well-being in the United States.","volume":"37","author":"Medoff","year":"2016","journal-title":"Health Care Women Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260850r31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000005035","article-title":"All-cause mortality in reproductive-aged females by state: an analysis of the effects of abortion legislation.","volume":"141","author":"Harper","year":"2023","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260850r32","first-page":"345","article-title":"Changes in frequency and health of live births following state abortion bans.","volume":"116","author":"Wallace","year":"2026","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi260850r33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"787","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amepre.2021.05.022","article-title":"Association of state gestational age limit abortion laws with infant mortality.","volume":"61","author":"Karletsos","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Prev Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260850r34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1139","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-021-07165-x","article-title":"Racial\/ethnic and educational inequities in restrictive abortion policy variation and adverse birth outcomes in the United States.","volume":"21","author":"Redd","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260850r35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2021.10.006","article-title":"Variation in restrictive abortion policies and adverse birth outcomes in the United States from 2005 to 2015.","volume":"32","author":"Redd","year":"2022","journal-title":"Womens Health Issues"},{"key":"zoi260850r36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/PHH.0000000000001133","author":"Burris","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Public Health Manag Pract"},{"key":"zoi260850r37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1177\/1073110517703329","article-title":"Legal epidemiology: the science of law.","volume":"45","author":"Ramanathan","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Law Med Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260850r41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-199803000-00017","article-title":"What are the fetal growth patterns of singletons, twins, and triplets in the United States?","volume":"41","author":"Alexander","year":"1998","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"zoi260850r42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","journal-title":"J Public Health Manag Pract","DOI":"10.1097\/PHH.0000000000002482"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260850r43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1111\/psrh.12275","article-title":"The impact of state Medicaid coverage of abortion on people accessing care in three states.","volume":"56","author":"Heil","year":"2024","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260850r50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2017.304278","article-title":"State law approaches to facility regulation of abortion and other office interventions.","volume":"108","author":"Jones","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"issue":"11","key":"zoi260850r51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamapediatrics.2014.2365","article-title":"Associations of tobacco control policies with birth outcomes.","volume":"168","author":"Hawkins","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA Pediatr"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260850r52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e211","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2014.01.003","article-title":"Out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage for abortion in the United States.","volume":"24","author":"Roberts","year":"2014","journal-title":"Womens Health Issues"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260850r53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1186\/s12889-025-25039-3","article-title":"Barriers to abortion access for young southerners: a qualitative analysis of case notes from ARC-Southeast.","volume":"26","author":"Larsen","year":"2025","journal-title":"BMC Public Health"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260850r54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1111\/psrh.12288","article-title":"Making sense of the economics of abortion in the United States.","volume":"56","author":"Weitz","year":"2024","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"zoi260850r38","volume-title":"Public Health Law Research: Theory and Methods","author":"Anderson","year":"2013"},{"key":"zoi260850r40"},{"key":"zoi260850r47","volume-title":"Status of Women in the States","author":"Institute for Women\u2019s Policy Research","year":"2025"},{"key":"zoi260850r21","unstructured":"Henshaw? SK, Joyce? TJ, Dennis? A, Finer? LB, Blanchard? K. Restrictions on Medicaid funding for abortions: a literature review. Guttmacher Institute. June 2009. Accessed July 9, 2026. https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/sites\/default\/files\/pdfs\/pubs\/MedicaidLitReview.pdf"},{"key":"zoi260850r28","unstructured":"#WeCount report, April 2022 to December 2024. Society of Family Planning. June 23, 2025. Accessed June 30, 2025. https:\/\/societyfp.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/WeCount-Report-9-December-2024-data.pdf"},{"key":"zoi260850r29","unstructured":"Joyce? TJ, Henshaw? SK, Dennis? A, Finer? LB, Blanchard? K. The impact of state mandatory counseling and waiting period laws on abortion: a literature review. Guttmacher Institute. April 2009. Accessed July 9, 2026. https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/sites\/default\/files\/pdfs\/pubs\/MandatoryCounseling.pdf"},{"key":"zoi260850r39","unstructured":"Dennis? A, Henshaw? SK, Joyce? TJ, Finer? LB, Blanchard? K. The impact of laws requiring parental involvement for abortion: a literature review. Guttmacher Institute. March 2009. Accessed July 9, 2026. https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/report\/impact-laws-requiring-parental-involvement-abortion-literature-review"},{"key":"zoi260850r44","unstructured":"Carrion? F, Duffy? C, Mendoza? C. Abortion coverage under Medicaid. National Health Law Program. April 27, 2022. Accessed December 11, 2025. https:\/\/healthlaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/FINAL-Abortion-Coverage-Under-Medicaid.pdf"},{"key":"zoi260850r45","unstructured":"Local Area Unemployment Statistics. Civilian noninstitutional population and associated rate and ratio measures for model-based areas. Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population, annual averages. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Last modified April 8, 2026. Accessed December 1, 2022. https:\/\/www.bls.gov\/lau\/rdscnp16.htm"},{"key":"zoi260850r46","unstructured":"Median household income by race (in year-specific inflation adjusted dollars) and tenure by race of householder, 2009-2021. Social Explorer; US Census Bureau. Accessed January 31, 2024. https:\/\/www.socialexplorer.com\/home\/dataset-entry\/us-census-data"},{"key":"zoi260850r48","unstructured":"State Partisan Composition. National Conference of State Legislatures. 2025. Accessed October 15, 2025. https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/about-state-legislatures\/state-partisan-composition"},{"key":"zoi260850r49","unstructured":"National Vital Statistics System. Natality on CDC WONDER online database. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. 2024. Accessed February 28, 2024. http:\/\/wonder.cdc.gov\/natality.html"}],"container-title":["JAMA Network Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/articlepdf\/2853789\/roberts_2026_oi_260850_1788194892.99173.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,4]],"date-time":"2026-09-04T15:37:15Z","timestamp":1788536235000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/fullarticle\/2853789"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,4]]},"references-count":54,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2026.30990","relation":{},"ISSN":["2574-3805"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2574-3805","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,4]]}}}