{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,19]],"date-time":"2026-10-19T23:17:42Z","timestamp":1792451862046,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA Netw Open"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260225-4\">\n                    <jats:title>Importance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Previous studies found reduced surgical site infections (SSIs) with \u03b2-lactam surgical infection prophylaxis compared with non\u2013\u03b2-lactam alternatives; however, variations in timing and dosing have been reported. Whether guideline-concordant preoperative antibiotic dosing or timing are associated with reported SSI differences between regimens is unclear.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260225-5\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To evaluate the incidence of SSIs between patients receiving \u03b2-lactam and non\u2013\u03b2-lactam alternative prophylaxis, while controlling guideline-concordant dosing and timing.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260225-6\">\n                    <jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This multicenter retrospective cohort study used data from a validated regional data registry. Adult patients (&amp;amp;gt;18 years) receiving \u03b2-lactam and non\u2013\u03b2-lactam alternative prophylaxis for elective colorectal surgery between July 2012 and June 2021 were included. Analyses were performed at multiple intervals between March 2022 and January 2026.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260225-7\">\n                    <jats:title>Exposures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Surgical prophylaxis regimens with \u03b2-lactam or non\u2013\u03b2-lactam alternative prophylaxis. Receipt of guideline-concordant prophylaxis dose and timing were variables of interest, defined using international guideline recommendations.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260225-8\">\n                    <jats:title>Main Outcomes and Measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The primary outcome was 30-day SSI. Modified Poisson regression with robust (sandwich) variance estimators was used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) for SSI comparing \u03b2-lactam with non\u2013\u03b2-lactam alternative prophylaxis, adjusting for guideline-concordant dosing, timing, and other covariates; 1:1 propensity score matching was performed as a sensitivity analysis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260225-9\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Among 20\u202f140 procedures (female, 10\u202f423 [51.8%]; male, 9717 [48.2%]; mean [SD] age, 62.0 [13.8] years), 18\u202f098 (89.9%) received \u03b2-lactam prophylaxis and 2042 (10.1%) received non\u2013\u03b2-lactam alternative prophylaxis. Baseline characteristics differed between groups. Patients in the \u03b2-lactam cohort more commonly received guideline-concordant antibiotic dosing (15\u202f124 [83.6%] vs 1084 [53.1%];\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;amp;lt;\u2009.001), guideline-concordant timing (16\u202f946 [93.6%] vs 1707 [83.6%];\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;amp;lt;\u2009.001), or combined guideline-concordant dose and timing (14\u202f216 [78.6%] vs 751 [36.8%];\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;amp;lt;\u2009.001), and had fewer SSIs (1114 [6.2%] vs 172 [8.4%];\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;amp;lt;\u2009.001). After adjusting for confounders, \u03b2-lactam prophylaxis was associated with a lower risk of SSIs (ARR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63-0.87;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;amp;lt; .001). Neither guideline-concordant dosing (ARR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.91-1.20;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .54) nor timing (ARR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.92-1.38;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .25) were associated with SSI risk.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260225-10\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this cohort study of elective colorectal surgery procedures, \u03b2-lactam surgical prophylaxis was associated with significantly lower SSI risk compared with non\u2013\u03b2-lactam alternatives. Differences in guideline-concordant dosing and timing between cohorts were not associated with SSI risk in adjusted analyses.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2026.6708","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T15:30:36Z","timestamp":1776094236000},"page":"e266708","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["\u03b2-Lactam vs Non\u2013\u03b2-Lactam Prophylaxis in Elective Colorectal Surgery"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Curtis D.","family":"Collins","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pharmacy Services, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Michigan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eric","family":"Hartsfield","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pharmacy Services, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Michigan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Robert K.","family":"Cleary","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Michigan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael P.","family":"Veve","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pharmacy, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan"},{"name":"Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kara K.","family":"Brockhaus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pharmacy Services, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Michigan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260225r1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1089\/sur.2010.083","article-title":"The surgical care improvement project and prevention of post-operative infection, including surgical site infection.","volume":"12","author":"Rosenberger","year":"2011","journal-title":"Surg Infect (Larchmt)"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260225r2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"659","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-018-4844-y","article-title":"Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations: 2018.","volume":"43","author":"Gustafsson","year":"2019","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi260225r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"784","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2017.0904","article-title":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017.","volume":"152","author":"Berr\u00edos-Torres","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260225r4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.2146\/ajhp120568","article-title":"Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery.","volume":"70","author":"Bratzler","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Health Syst Pharm"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi260225r5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"695","DOI":"10.1017\/ice.2023.67","article-title":"Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 update.","volume":"44","author":"Calderwood","year":"2023","journal-title":"Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi260225r6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"602","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajic.2018.01.018","article-title":"Update to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection (2017): a summary, review, and strategies for implementation.","volume":"46","author":"O\u2019Hara","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Infect Control"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260225r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1177\/000313481908500219","article-title":"The cost of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery in the United States from 2001 to 2012: a longitudinal analysis.","volume":"85","author":"Gantz","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260225r8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2022.24075","article-title":"Surgical site infection prevention: a review.","volume":"329","author":"Seidelman","year":"2023","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260225r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.1093\/cid\/cix794","article-title":"The impact of a reported penicillin allergy on surgical site infection risk.","volume":"66","author":"Blumenthal","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Infect Dis"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260225r10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.1017\/ice.2019.374","article-title":"Self-reported beta-lactam allergy and the risk of surgical site infection: a retrospective cohort study.","volume":"41","author":"Lam","year":"2020","journal-title":"Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol"},{"issue":"9","key":"zoi260225r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1101","DOI":"10.1017\/ice.2021.310","article-title":"Anatomy of a successful stewardship intervention: improving perioperative prescribing in penicillin-allergic patients.","volume":"43","author":"Sexton","year":"2022","journal-title":"Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol"},{"issue":"11","key":"zoi260225r12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1397","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0000000000002190","article-title":"Impact of patient-reported penicillin allergy on antibiotic prophylaxis and surgical site infection among patients undergoing colorectal surgery.","volume":"65","author":"Khan","year":"2022","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi260225r13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1404","DOI":"10.1093\/cid\/ciaa232","article-title":"Impact of an antibiotic side-chain-based cross-reactivity chart combined with enhanced allergy assessment processes for surgical prophylaxis antimicrobials in patients with \u00df-lactam allergies.","volume":"72","author":"Collins","year":"2021","journal-title":"Clin Infect Dis"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi260225r14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jaci.2022.08.028","article-title":"Drug allergy: a 2022 practice parameter update.","volume":"150","author":"Khan","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Allergy Clin Immunol"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260225r15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2021.0021","article-title":"Assessment of the frequency of dual allergy to penicillins and cefazolin: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"156","author":"Sousa-Pinto","year":"2021","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi260225r16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2019.07.011","article-title":"\u00df-Lactam vs non-\u00df-lactam antibiotics and surgical site infection in colectomy patients.","volume":"229","author":"Kuriakose","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260225r17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e31826c4009","article-title":"Antibiotic choice is independently associated with risk of surgical site infection after colectomy: a population-based cohort study.","volume":"257","author":"Hendren","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"zoi260225r18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1260","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2025.3789","article-title":"Non-\u00df-lactam antibiotic use, \u00df-lactam allergy, and surgical site infections.","volume":"160","author":"Agarwal","year":"2025","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"zoi260225r20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1017\/ice.2025.10294","article-title":"Consequences of reported \u00df-lactam allergy on perioperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical site infection risk.","author":"Hanai","year":"2025","journal-title":"Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi260225r21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e270","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-D-19-00168","article-title":"Perioperative clindamycin use in penicillin allergic patients is associated with a higher risk of infection after shoulder arthroplasty.","volume":"28","author":"Yian","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi260225r22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"881","DOI":"10.1017\/ice.2022.192","article-title":"Surgical site infection rates are higher among elective colorectal surgery patients receiving non-beta-lactam-based antimicrobial prophylaxis: a retrospective chart review.","volume":"44","author":"Fernandes","year":"2023","journal-title":"Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol"},{"key":"zoi260225r23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhin.2024.10.010","article-title":"Surgical site infection prevention care bundles in colorectal surgery: a scoping review.","volume":"155","author":"Cunha","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Hosp Infect"},{"issue":"10","key":"zoi260225r24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2025.40809","article-title":"\u00df-Lactam vs non-\u00df-lactam antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical site infection.","volume":"8","author":"Largiad\u00e8r","year":"2025","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260225r25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2013.05.024","article-title":"Is it time to refine? An exploration and simulation of optimal antibiotic timing in general surgery.","volume":"217","author":"Koch","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"zoi260225r26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1368","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0000000000003450","article-title":"The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons clinical practice guidelines for preventing surgical site infection.","volume":"67","author":"Shogan","year":"2024","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260225r27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2016.10.029","article-title":"American College of Surgeons and Surgical Infection Society: surgical site infection guidelines, 2016 update.","volume":"224","author":"Ban","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"zoi260225r28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e276","DOI":"10.1016\/S1473-3099(16)30398-X","article-title":"New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective.","volume":"16","author":"Allegranzi","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet Infect Dis"},{"key":"zoi260225r30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/ice.2024.215","article-title":"Incidence of surgical infection in cefazolin 3 g versus 2 g for colorectal surgery in obese patients.","author":"Collins","journal-title":"Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol"},{"issue":"10","key":"zoi260225r31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1012","DOI":"10.1177\/000313480807401028","article-title":"The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) initiative to reduce infection in elective colorectal surgery: which performance measures affect outcome?","volume":"74","author":"Nguyen","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260225r32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijantimicag.2012.09.017","article-title":"Pharmacodynamic modelling of intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery.","volume":"41","author":"Moine","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Antimicrob Agents"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260225r33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1673350","article-title":"Statewide clinic registries: the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative.","volume":"32","author":"Nikolian","year":"2019","journal-title":"Clin Colon Rectal Surg"},{"issue":"15","key":"zoi260225r35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.3390\/healthcare12151513","article-title":"Racial disparities in bowel preparation and post-operative outcomes in colorectal cancer patients.","volume":"12","author":"Hernandez","year":"2024","journal-title":"Healthcare (Basel)"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi260225r36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2022.29247","article-title":"Association of rurality, race and ethnicity, and socioeconomic status with the surgical management of colon cancer and postoperative outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries.","volume":"5","author":"Ramkumar","year":"2022","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"29","key":"zoi260225r37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000006903","article-title":"Timing of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in 54,552 patients and the risk of surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"96","author":"de Jonge","year":"2017","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260225r38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1053\/jhin.2000.0814","article-title":"A prospective, randomized, double-blind study of single high dose versus multiple standard dose gentamicin both in combination with metronidazole for colorectal surgical prophylaxis.","volume":"46","author":"Zelenitsky","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Hosp Infect"},{"issue":"9","key":"zoi260225r39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3026","DOI":"10.1128\/AAC.46.9.3026-3030.2002","article-title":"Antibiotic pharmacodynamics in surgical prophylaxis: an association between intraoperative antibiotic concentrations and efficacy.","volume":"46","author":"Zelenitsky","year":"2002","journal-title":"Antimicrob Agents Chemother"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi260225r40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1050","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005436","article-title":"Intraoperative redosing of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in addition to preoperative prophylaxis versus single-dose prophylaxis for the prevention of surgical site infection: a meta-analysis and GRADE recommendation.","volume":"275","author":"Wolfhagen","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"zoi260225r41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13741-017-0059-2","article-title":"Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) I Workgroup. American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER) and Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) joint consensus statement on prevention of postoperative infection within an enhanced recovery pathway for elective colorectal surgery.","author":"Holubar","journal-title":"Perioper Med (Lond)"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260225r42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.4952","article-title":"Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review.","volume":"152","author":"Ljungqvist","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"zoi260225r19","author":"Norvell","year":"2023"},{"key":"zoi260225r29","unstructured":"Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; The Joint Commission. Specifications Manual for National Hospital Inpatient Quality Measures, version 3.1a. April 1, 2010. Accessed October 8, 2025. https:\/\/www.hospitalsafetygrade.org\/media\/file\/SCIPINF1.pdf?"},{"key":"zoi260225r34","unstructured":"Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative. Home page. Accessed November 4, 2025. https:\/\/msqc.org\/"}],"container-title":["JAMA Network Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/articlepdf\/2847673\/collins_2026_oi_260225_1775496082.33.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T15:30:38Z","timestamp":1776094238000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/fullarticle\/2847673"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2026.6708","relation":{},"ISSN":["2574-3805"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2574-3805","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]}}}