{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T03:58:04Z","timestamp":1790740684719,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":61,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA Netw Open"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260235-4\">\n                    <jats:title>Importance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) improves patients\u2019 quality of life, but patients often lack reliable, individualized information about complication risk. Machine learning (ML) can analyze complex clinical data to generate personalized risk estimates, facilitating shared decision-making.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260235-5\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To develop and validate ML models trained on both structured data and manually abstracted variables from unstructured clinical notes to predict major complications after PMBR.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260235-6\">\n                    <jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This prognostic study used retrospective data from female patients aged 18 years or older who underwent unilateral or bilateral therapeutic mastectomy with immediate or delayed implant-based or autologous reconstruction at 2 academic centers in the US from 2012 to 2022. Demographic, treatment, and surgical variables were extracted from electronic health records with a 1-year postoperative follow-up period. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and random forest models were trained on 80% of the cohort (329 individuals) and tested on 20% of the cohort (82 individuals). Patients with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy, distant metastases, mixed autologous and implant-based reconstruction, or less than 12 months of follow-up were excluded. Of more than 4000 eligible patients, a random sample of 411 underwent manual health record review for variable abstraction. Data were analyzed from September through November 2024.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260235-7\">\n                    <jats:title>Exposures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>PMBR.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260235-8\">\n                    <jats:title>Main Outcomes and Measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Outcomes of interest were major complications, defined as unplanned reoperations or rehospitalizations within 1 year of reconstruction. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260235-9\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The sample included 411 female patients (667 breasts) receiving implant-based (290 individuals [70.6%]) or autologous (121 individuals [29.4%]) PMBR, with a median (IQR) age of 51.3 (44.0-58.3) years. The overall major complication rate was 25.8% (106 individuals). The XGBoost model outperformed the random forest model, achieving an AUROC of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.72-0.94) and an AUPRC of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.55-0.69; baseline: 0.26) on the test set, compared with 0.74 (95% CI, 0.66-0.82) and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.50-0.62), respectively, for the random forest model. Top predictors of major complications included smoking, adjuvant radiotherapy, body mass index, age, and diabetes. Model performance remained consistent across reconstructive modalities.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-zoi260235-10\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this prognostic study of PMBR outcomes, an internally validated ML model trained on both structured and unstructured clinical data was used to predict 1-year major complications. Such models support personalized risk assessment, inform decision-making, and provide a foundation for future externally validated and prospectively tested decision-support tools.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2026.7232","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,15]],"date-time":"2026-04-15T15:30:28Z","timestamp":1776267028000},"page":"e267232","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Machine Learning Model to Predict Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Complications"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Mohammed S.","family":"Shaheen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor"},{"name":"Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Brennen T.","family":"McManus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Clara M.","family":"Cullen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor"},{"name":"Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jung-Sheng","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arash","family":"Momeni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chang-Fu","family":"Kuo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan"},{"name":"Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan"},{"name":"Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan"},{"name":"Center for Molecular and Clinical and Immunology, Institute of Immunology and Translational Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ping-Han","family":"Tsai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kevin C.","family":"Chung","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,15]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260235r1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1186\/s40364-021-00310-y","article-title":"Epidemiological trends of women\u2019s cancers from 1990 to 2019 at the global, regional, and national levels: a population-based study.","volume":"9","author":"Yi","year":"2021","journal-title":"Biomark Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi260235r2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21863","article-title":"Breast cancer statistics 2024.","volume":"74","author":"Giaquinto","year":"2024","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260235r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1186\/s40364-024-00631-8","article-title":"Global burden of breast cancer and attributable risk factors in 204 countries and territories, from 1990 to 2021: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.","volume":"12","author":"Sha","year":"2024","journal-title":"Biomark Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260235r4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1007\/s12282-018-0846-8","article-title":"Meta-analysis for psychological impact of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer.","volume":"25","author":"Chen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Breast Cancer"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260235r5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201e","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e31829586a7","article-title":"Quality-of-life outcomes between mastectomy alone and breast reconstruction: comparison of patient-reported BREAST-Q and other health-related quality-of-life measures.","volume":"132","author":"Eltahir","year":"2013","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"zoi260235r6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1469","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.08.015","article-title":"A five year experience of measuring clinical effectiveness in a breast reconstruction service using the BREAST-Q patient reported outcomes measure: a cohort study.","volume":"69","author":"Dean","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260235r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-012-2349-1","article-title":"The effect of breast reconstruction surgery on body image among women after mastectomy: a meta-analysis.","volume":"137","author":"Fang","year":"2013","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi260235r8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1014","DOI":"10.1097\/00006534-200010000-00010","article-title":"Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study.","volume":"106","author":"Wilkins","year":"2000","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"zoi260235r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2022.815498","article-title":"Long-term patient satisfaction and quality of life following breast reconstruction using the BREAST-Q: a prospective cohort study.","volume":"12","author":"Shiraishi","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi260235r10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1103","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001561","article-title":"How informed is the decision about breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a prospective, cross-sectional study.","volume":"264","author":"Lee","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi260235r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"563","DOI":"10.1097\/SAP.0b013e3181c01279","article-title":"Do patients and providers agree about the most important facts and goals for breast reconstruction decisions?","volume":"64","author":"Lee","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"zoi260235r12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1285","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2023.4432","article-title":"Patient preferences for postmastectomy breast reconstruction.","volume":"158","author":"Shammas","year":"2023","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"zoi260235r13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3466","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-020-08307-x","article-title":"Development and evaluation of a machine learning prediction model for flap failure in microvascular breast reconstruction.","volume":"27","author":"O\u2019Neill","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260235r14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1e","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000008635","article-title":"Risk of developing breast reconstruction complications: a machine-learning nomogram for individualized risk estimation with and without postmastectomy radiation therapy.","volume":"149","author":"Naoum","year":"2022","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"zoi260235r15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpra.2023.07.008","article-title":"Machine-learning prediction of capsular contraction after two-stage breast reconstruction.","volume":"38","author":"Chen","year":"2023","journal-title":"JPRAS Open"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260235r16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1097\/SAP.0000000000003621","article-title":"Predicting complications in breast reconstruction: development and prospective validation of a machine learning model.","volume":"91","author":"Braun","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260235r17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000012124","article-title":"Artificial intelligence risk prediction tools for alloplastic breast reconstruction.","volume":"156","author":"Chen","year":"2025","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"zoi260235r18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2025.06.020","article-title":"Predicting complications in breast reconstruction: external validation of a machine learning model.","volume":"107","author":"Meyer","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"zoi260235r19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.xcrm.2023.101260","article-title":"Combining clinical notes with structured electronic health records enhances the prediction of mental health crises.","volume":"4","author":"Garriga","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cell Rep Med"},{"key":"zoi260235r20","first-page":"719","article-title":"A multimodal transformer: fusing clinical notes with structured EHR data for interpretable in-hospital mortality prediction.","volume":"2022","author":"Lyu","year":"2023","journal-title":"AMIA Annu Symp Proc"},{"key":"zoi260235r21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.3233\/SHTI190219","article-title":"Combining structured and unstructured data for predicting risk of readmission for heart failure patients.","volume":"264","author":"Mahajan","year":"2019","journal-title":"Stud Health Technol Inform"},{"issue":"2","key":"zoi260235r22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2022.02.004","article-title":"Psychobiological, clinical, and sociocultural factors that influence Black women seeking treatment for infertility: a mixed-methods study.","volume":"3","author":"Cebert-Gaitors","year":"2022","journal-title":"F S Rep"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260235r23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1370\/afm.1195","article-title":"Methods to achieve high interrater reliability in data collection from primary care medical records.","volume":"9","author":"Liddy","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Fam Med"},{"issue":"9","key":"zoi260235r24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2022-062264","article-title":"Methodology paper for the General Medicine Inpatient Initiative Medical Education Database (GEMINI MedED): a retrospective cohort study of internal medicine resident case-mix, clinical care and patient outcomes.","volume":"12","author":"Lam","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260235r25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002033","article-title":"Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: one-year outcomes of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium (MROC) study.","volume":"267","author":"Wilkins","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"zoi260235r26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"847","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2021.2239","article-title":"Association of clinical complications of chemotherapy and patient-reported outcomes after immediate breast reconstruction.","volume":"156","author":"Hart","year":"2021","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"zoi260235r27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/GOX.0000000000004693","article-title":"Predictors of complications after breast reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"10","author":"Mrad","year":"2022","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open"},{"issue":"4","key":"zoi260235r28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.21037\/gs.2017.04.04","article-title":"Patient determinants as independent risk factors for postoperative complications of breast reconstruction.","volume":"6","author":"Thorarinsson","year":"2017","journal-title":"Gland Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"zoi260235r29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3030","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2022.06.063","article-title":"Post-mastectomy adjuvant radiotherapy for direct-to-implant and two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis.","volume":"75","author":"Du","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi260235r30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1533","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2022.06.055","article-title":"Development of a machine learning model to predict outcomes and cost after cardiac surgery.","volume":"115","author":"Zea-Vera","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260235r31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1007\/s40708-017-0065-7","article-title":"Machine learning-XGBoost analysis of language networks to classify patients with epilepsy.","volume":"4","author":"Torlay","year":"2017","journal-title":"Brain Inform"},{"key":"zoi260235r32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.3389\/fgene.2019.00600","article-title":"Five-feature model for developing the classifier for synergistic vs. antagonistic drug combinations built by XGBoost.","volume":"10","author":"Ji","year":"2019","journal-title":"Front Genet"},{"issue":"10","key":"zoi260235r33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"749","DOI":"10.1038\/s41551-018-0304-0","article-title":"Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery.","volume":"2","author":"Lundberg","year":"2018","journal-title":"Nat Biomed Eng"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi260235r36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16700","DOI":"10.20452\/pamw.16700","article-title":"Comparison of an interpretable extreme gradient boosting model and an artificial neural network model for prediction of severe acute pancreatitis.","volume":"134","author":"Lu","year":"2024","journal-title":"Pol Arch Intern Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260235r37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1010933404324","article-title":"Random forests.","volume":"45","author":"Breiman","year":"2001","journal-title":"Mach Learn"},{"key":"zoi260235r38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6947-11-51","article-title":"Predicting disease risks from highly imbalanced data using random forest.","volume":"11","author":"Khalilia","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260235r39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1093\/bib\/bbs034","article-title":"Data mining in the life sciences with random forest: a walk in the park or lost in the jungle?","volume":"14","author":"Touw","year":"2013","journal-title":"Brief Bioinform"},{"key":"zoi260235r41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/49023","article-title":"Practical considerations and applied examples of cross-validation for model development and evaluation in health care: tutorial.","volume":"2","author":"Wilimitis","year":"2023","journal-title":"JMIR AI"},{"key":"zoi260235r42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2021.09.009","article-title":"Machine learning to predict individual patient-reported outcomes at 2-year follow-up for women undergoing cancer-related mastectomy and breast reconstruction (INSPiRED-001).","volume":"60","author":"Pfob","year":"2021","journal-title":"Breast"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260235r43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0118432","article-title":"The precision-recall plot is more informative than the ROC plot when evaluating binary classifiers on imbalanced datasets.","volume":"10","author":"Saito","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"3","key":"zoi260235r44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.1097\/CCM.0000000000002943","article-title":"Rare events in the ICU: an emerging challenge in classification and prediction.","volume":"46","author":"Leisman","year":"2018","journal-title":"Crit Care Med"},{"issue":"8","key":"zoi260235r45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1843","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-019-04338-2","article-title":"Use of machine learning for prediction of patient risk of postoperative complications after liver, pancreatic, and colorectal surgery.","volume":"24","author":"Merath","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260235r46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1186\/s12911-020-01297-6","article-title":"Combining structured and unstructured data for predictive models: a deep learning approach.","volume":"20","author":"Zhang","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"},{"key":"zoi260235r47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fdgth.2022.945006","article-title":"Structured data vs. unstructured data in machine learning prediction models for suicidal behaviors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"4","author":"Hopkins","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front Digit Health"},{"issue":"11","key":"zoi260235r48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1056","DOI":"10.1016\/j.soard.2024.08.008","article-title":"Predicting serious postoperative complications and evaluating racial fairness in machine learning algorithms for metabolic and bariatric surgery.","volume":"20","author":"Kang","year":"2024","journal-title":"Surg Obes Relat Dis"},{"issue":"7","key":"zoi260235r49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1225","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers17071225","article-title":"Machine learning insight: unveiling overlooked risk factors for postoperative complications in gastric cancer.","volume":"17","author":"Lee","year":"2025","journal-title":"Cancers (Basel)"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260235r50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-024-01360-w","article-title":"Estimation of minimal data sets sizes for machine learning predictions in digital mental health interventions.","volume":"7","author":"Zantvoort","year":"2024","journal-title":"NPJ Digit Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi260235r51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1097\/ACO.0000000000000779","article-title":"Primer on machine learning: utilization of large data set analyses to individualize pain management.","volume":"32","author":"Rashidi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Curr Opin Anaesthesiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260235r52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-025-02470-z","article-title":"Scalable information extraction from free text electronic health records using large language models.","volume":"25","author":"Gu","year":"2025","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"zoi260235r53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1186\/s12911-019-0781-4","article-title":"Clinical text classification with rule-based features and knowledge-guided convolutional neural networks.","volume":"19","author":"Yao","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"},{"key":"zoi260235r54","first-page":"1812","article-title":"Clinical named entity recognition using deep learning models.","volume":"2017","author":"Wu","year":"2018","journal-title":"AMIA Annu Symp Proc"},{"issue":"5","key":"zoi260235r55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"552","DOI":"10.1136\/amiajnl-2011-000203","article-title":"2010 i2b2\/VA challenge on concepts, assertions, and relations in clinical text.","volume":"18","author":"Uzuner","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Am Med Inform Assoc"},{"issue":"10","key":"zoi260235r56","first-page":"281","article-title":"Random search for hyper-parameter optimization.","volume":"13","author":"Bergstra","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Mach Learn Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260235r58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-022-12567-0","article-title":"Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: a systemic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"30","author":"Ostapenko","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"zoi260235r59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.5999\/aps.2019.00353","article-title":"Considerations for patient selection: prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.","volume":"46","author":"Yang","year":"2019","journal-title":"Arch Plast Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"zoi260235r60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.21037\/gs.2018.08.01","article-title":"Strategies and considerations in selecting between subpectoral and prepectoral breast reconstruction.","volume":"8","author":"Salibian","year":"2019","journal-title":"Gland Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"zoi260235r61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/GOX.0000000000003709","article-title":"Comparative analysis of prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.","volume":"9","author":"Plachinski","year":"2021","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open"},{"key":"zoi260235r34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"785","DOI":"10.1145\/2939672.2939785","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining","author":"Chen","year":"2016"},{"key":"zoi260235r40","first-page":"1137","volume-title":"IJCAI'95: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence\u2014Volume 2","author":"Kohavi","year":"1995"},{"key":"zoi260235r57","volume-title":"Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25: NIPS 2012","author":"Snoek","year":"2012"},{"key":"zoi260235r35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shwartz-Ziv? R, Armon? A. Tabular data: Deep learning is not all you need.? arXiv. Preprint posted online November 23, 2021. doi:10.48550\/ARXIV.2106.03253","DOI":"10.1016\/j.inffus.2021.11.011"}],"container-title":["JAMA Network Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/articlepdf\/2847773\/shaheen_2026_oi_260235_1775667471.22793.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,15]],"date-time":"2026-04-15T15:30:30Z","timestamp":1776267030000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/fullarticle\/2847773"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,15]]},"references-count":61,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2026.7232","relation":{},"ISSN":["2574-3805"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2574-3805","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,15]]}}}