{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T00:51:58Z","timestamp":1789692718604,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":75,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"8","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,1]]},"DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2020.0322","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,3]],"date-time":"2020-06-03T17:01:11Z","timestamp":1591203671000},"page":"759","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":96,"title":["Deimplementation of the Choosing Wisely Recommendations for Low-Value Breast Cancer Surgery"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"155","author":[{"given":"Ton","family":"Wang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor"},{"name":"Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alison S.","family":"Baskin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lesly A.","family":"Dossett","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor"},{"name":"Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10","reference":[{"issue":"14","key":"srv200004r1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1513","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2012.362","article-title":"Eliminating waste in US health care.","volume":"307","author":"Berwick","year":"2012","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"11","key":"srv200004r2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1091","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.0018","article-title":"Reducing overtreatment of cancer with precision medicine: just what the doctor ordered.","volume":"319","author":"Katz","year":"2018","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"17","key":"srv200004r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1801","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2012.476","article-title":"Choosing wisely: helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care.","volume":"307","author":"Cassel","year":"2012","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"srv200004r4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2019.2309","article-title":"Assessment of Surgical Specialty Societies\u2019 Choosing Wisely Recommendations.","author":"Antunez","year":"2019","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"srv200004r5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3112","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-016-5327-8","article-title":"Measures of appropriateness and value for breast surgeons and their patients: the American Society of Breast Surgeons Choosing Wisely (\u00ae) initiative.","volume":"23","author":"Landercasper","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"10","key":"srv200004r6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3144","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-012-2531-z","article-title":"American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011: impact on surgeon practice patterns.","volume":"19","author":"Caudle","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"srv200004r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1111\/tbj.12728","article-title":"Healthcare costs reduced after incorporating the results of the american college of surgeons oncology group Z0011 trial into clinical practice.","volume":"23","author":"Fillion","year":"2017","journal-title":"Breast J"},{"issue":"2","key":"srv200004r8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2015.11.014","article-title":"Impact of American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z11 on surgical training at an academic cancer center.","volume":"201","author":"Gabriel","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Surg Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"srv200004r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1093\/ajcp\/aqw078","article-title":"Sentinel lymph node frozen-section utilization declines after publication of American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial results with no change in subsequent surgery for axillary lymph node dissection.","volume":"146","author":"Jorns","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Clin Pathol"},{"key":"srv200004r10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.07.014","article-title":"The impact of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial: an institutional review.","volume":"29","author":"Le","year":"2016","journal-title":"Breast"},{"issue":"6","key":"srv200004r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1060","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2014.08.009","article-title":"Have the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial results influenced the number of lymph nodes removed during sentinel lymph node dissection?","volume":"208","author":"Robinson","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"srv200004r12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S470","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-015-4698-6","article-title":"Do the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria affect the number of sentinel lymph nodes removed?","volume":"22","author":"Subhedar","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"srv200004r13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clbc.2017.10.007","article-title":"Expanding implementation of ACOSOG Z0011 in surgeon practice.","volume":"18","author":"Weiss","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Breast Cancer"},{"issue":"2","key":"srv200004r14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2014.07.001","article-title":"Measuring the impact of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial on breast cancer surgery in a community health system.","volume":"209","author":"Wright","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"srv200004r15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1309","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.2015.1490","article-title":"Contrary to conventional wisdom, physicians abandoned a breast cancer treatment after a trial concluded it was ineffective.","volume":"35","author":"Howard","year":"2016","journal-title":"Health Aff (Millwood)"},{"issue":"4","key":"srv200004r16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e477","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clbc.2017.09.001","article-title":"The state of surgical axillary management and adjuvant radiotherapy for early-stage invasive breast cancer in the modern era.","volume":"18","author":"Mann","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Breast Cancer"},{"issue":"2","key":"srv200004r17","first-page":"309","article-title":"NSQIP analysis of axillary lymph node dissection rates for breast cancer: implications for resident and fellow participation.","volume":"24","author":"Nocera","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"srv200004r18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"786","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2019.07.013","article-title":"Decreasing rates of axillary lymph node dissections over time: implications for surgical resident exposure and operative skills development.","volume":"218","author":"Rosenberger","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"srv200004r19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.035","article-title":"Impact of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial on the number of axillary nodes removed for patients with early-stage breast cancer.","volume":"221","author":"Yao","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"srv200004r20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2018.01.050","article-title":"Evaluating the effect of margin consensus guideline publication on operative patterns and financial impact of breast cancer operation.","volume":"227","author":"Bhutiani","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"srv200004r21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S422","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-015-4829-0","article-title":"Impact of consensus guidelines by the Society of Surgical Oncology and the American Society for Radiation Oncology on margins for breast-conserving surgery in stages 1 and 2 invasive breast cancer.","volume":"22","author":"Chung","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"srv200004r22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1104","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2017.08.023","article-title":"\u201cRe-excision rates after breast conserving surgery following the 2014 SSO-ASTRO guidelines\u201d.","volume":"214","author":"Heelan Gladden","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"srv200004r23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1040","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.v116.8","article-title":"Changes in margin re-excision rates: experience incorporating the \u201cno ink on tumor\u201d guideline into practice.","volume":"116","author":"Patten","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"10","key":"srv200004r24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3239","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-016-5397-7","article-title":"Early adoption of the SSO-ASTRO consensus guidelines on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stage i and ii invasive breast cancer: initial experience from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.","volume":"23","author":"Rosenberger","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"srv200004r25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2018.06.045","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of surgeon performed intraoperative specimen ink in breast conservation surgery.","volume":"231","author":"Van Den Bruele","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Surg Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"srv200004r26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"504","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.043","article-title":"Surgeon re-excision rates after breast-conserving surgery: a measure of low-value care.","volume":"228","author":"Kaczmarski","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"srv200004r27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2019.02.051","article-title":"Impact of the Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology margin guidelines on breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy trends.","volume":"229","author":"Kantor","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"srv200004r28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1352","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaoncol.2017.0774","article-title":"Trends in reoperation after initial lumpectomy for breast cancer: addressing overtreatment in surgical management.","volume":"3","author":"Morrow","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"srv200004r29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-016-5516-5","article-title":"Reexcision surgery for breast cancer: an analysis of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) MasterySM database following the SSO-ASTRO \u201cno ink on tumor\u201d guidelines.","volume":"24","author":"Schulman","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"srv200004r30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clbc.2019.01.007","article-title":"Breast cancer in women aged 80 years or older: an analysis of treatment patterns and disease outcomes.","volume":"19","author":"Ferrigni","year":"2019","journal-title":"Clin Breast Cancer"},{"issue":"10","key":"srv200004r31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3371","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-016-5368-z","article-title":"Early-stage breast cancer in the octogenarian: tumor characteristics, treatment choices, and clinical outcomes.","volume":"23","author":"Mamtani","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"srv200004r32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1082","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2017.07.036","article-title":"Does lymph node status influence adjuvant therapy decision-making in women 70 years of age or older with clinically node negative hormone receptor positive breast cancer?","volume":"214","author":"Chagpar","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"srv200004r33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3073","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-017-5936-x","article-title":"Association of LN evaluation with survival in women aged 70 years or older with clinically node-negative hormone receptor positive breast cancer.","volume":"24","author":"Chagpar","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"srv200004r34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-017-4528-6","article-title":"Patterns of axillary evaluation in older patients with breast cancer and associations with adjuvant therapy receipt.","volume":"167","author":"Dominici","year":"2018","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"issue":"3","key":"srv200004r35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2015.11.005","article-title":"Surgery and hormone therapy trends in octogenarians with invasive breast cancer.","volume":"211","author":"Kantor","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"srv200004r36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2600","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-012-2299-1","article-title":"Comparison of patient characteristics and outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and unilateral total mastectomy in breast cancer patients.","volume":"19","author":"Chung","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"srv200004r37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1356","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-010-1434-0","article-title":"Mastectomy and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates: an institutional review.","volume":"18","author":"Damle","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"srv200004r38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1199","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2015.11.001","article-title":"Use of immediate breast reconstruction and choice for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.","volume":"159","author":"Hoskin","year":"2016","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"issue":"1","key":"srv200004r39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/NCC.0000000000000564","article-title":"Rising rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy as a treatment for early-stage breast cancer.","volume":"42","author":"Jerome-D'Emilia","year":"2019","journal-title":"Cancer Nurs"},{"issue":"10","key":"srv200004r40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2691","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-009-0547-9","article-title":"Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer: an increasing trend at a single institution.","volume":"16","author":"Jones","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"16","key":"srv200004r41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2158","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2010.29.4041","article-title":"Clinical management factors contribute to the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.","volume":"29","author":"King","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"srv200004r42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S153","DOI":"10.1097\/SAP.0000000000000099","article-title":"Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and the impact on breast reconstruction.","volume":"72","author":"Pinell-White","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"srv200004r43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.1111\/tbj.2016.22.issue-6","article-title":"Differences between breast conservation-eligible patients and unilateral mastectomy patients in choosing contralateral prophylactic mastectomies.","volume":"22","author":"Sabel","year":"2016","journal-title":"Breast J"},{"key":"srv200004r44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-010-1259-x","article-title":"Increase in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: echoes of a bygone era? surgical trends for unilateral breast cancer.","volume":"17","author":"Stucky","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"7","key":"srv200004r45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"709","DOI":"10.1177\/000313481708300726","article-title":"Factors affecting choice of treatment for early-stage breast cancer in West Virginia: a 10-year experience from a rural tertiary care center.","volume":"83","author":"Suggs","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"srv200004r46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1026","DOI":"10.1158\/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0130","article-title":"Factors affecting the decision of breast cancer patients to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.","volume":"3","author":"Yi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cancer Prev Res (Phila)"},{"issue":"1","key":"srv200004r47","first-page":"28","article-title":"Trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and other types of breast cancer surgery, South Carolina, 2005-2013.","volume":"45","author":"Clerville","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Registry Manag"},{"key":"srv200004r48","first-page":"13","article-title":"Socioeconomic factors associated with the receipt of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with breast cancer.","volume":"13","author":"Jerome-D\u2019Emilia","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Womens Health (Larchmt)"},{"issue":"9","key":"srv200004r49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"902","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.10707","article-title":"Use of and mortality after bilateral mastectomy compared with other surgical treatments for breast cancer in California, 1998-2011.","volume":"312","author":"Kurian","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"23","key":"srv200004r50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5404","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.v115:23","article-title":"Surveillance of prophylactic mastectomy: trends in use from 1995 through 2005.","volume":"115","author":"McLaughlin","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"srv200004r51","first-page":"1","article-title":"Factors associated with contralateral preventive mastectomy.","volume":"7","author":"Yakoub","year":"2015","journal-title":"Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)"},{"issue":"3","key":"srv200004r52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000001044","article-title":"Defining the relationship between patient decisions to undergo breast reconstruction and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.","volume":"135","author":"Agarwal","year":"2015","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"srv200004r53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1518","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000001276","article-title":"Bilateral mastectomy versus breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer: the role of breast reconstruction.","volume":"135","author":"Albornoz","year":"2015","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"srv200004r54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"320e","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e31827cf576","article-title":"A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: part 2, the influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method.","volume":"131","author":"Cemal","year":"2013","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"srv200004r55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.033","article-title":"Variation in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates according to racial groups in young women with breast cancer, 1998 to 2011: a report from the National Cancer Data Base.","volume":"221","author":"Grimmer","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"srv200004r56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2014.2895","article-title":"Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer.","volume":"150","author":"Kummerow","year":"2015","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"srv200004r57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"648","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2017.0115","article-title":"State variation in the receipt of a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among women who received a diagnosis of invasive unilateral early-stage breast cancer in the United States, 2004-2012.","volume":"152","author":"Nash","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"srv200004r58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.043","article-title":"Changing surgical trends in young patients with early stage breast cancer, 2003 to 2010: a report from the National Cancer Data Base.","volume":"219","author":"Pesce","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"issue":"33","key":"srv200004r59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5203","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2007.12.3141","article-title":"Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment.","volume":"25","author":"Tuttle","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"srv200004r60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-016-3707-1","article-title":"Trends in the use of mastectomy in women with small node-negative breast cancer treated at US academic centers.","volume":"155","author":"Vaz-Luis","year":"2016","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"issue":"3","key":"srv200004r61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001698","article-title":"Growing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy despite no improvement in long-term survival for invasive breast cancer.","volume":"265","author":"Wong","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"srv200004r62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2554","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-010-1091-3","article-title":"Trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral cancer: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 1998-2007.","volume":"17","author":"Yao","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"srv200004r63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2011.90","article-title":"Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial.","volume":"305","author":"Giuliano","year":"2011","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"3","key":"srv200004r64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"704","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-014-3481-4","article-title":"Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer.","volume":"21","author":"Moran","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"10","key":"srv200004r65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3100","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-016-5443-5","article-title":"Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) consensus statement from the American Society of Breast Surgeons: data on CPM outcomes and risks.","volume":"23","author":"Boughey","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"9","key":"srv200004r66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2425","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-007-9447-z","article-title":"Society of Surgical Oncology: position statement on prophylactic mastectomy, approved by the Society of Surgical Oncology Executive Council, March 2007.","volume":"14","author":"Giuliano","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"19","key":"srv200004r67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2382","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2012.45.2615","article-title":"Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women age 70 years or older with early breast cancer: long-term follow-up of CALGB 9343.","volume":"31","author":"Hughes","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"10","key":"srv200004r68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3152","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-012-2523-z","article-title":"Changing behavior in clinical practice in response to the ACOSOG Z0011 trial: a survey of the American Society of Breast Surgeons.","volume":"19","author":"Gainer","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"20","key":"srv200004r69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1681","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/92.20.1681","article-title":"Patient preferences for axillary dissection in the management of early-stage breast cancer.","volume":"92","author":"Galper","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"issue":"5","key":"srv200004r70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1238","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-019-07247-5","article-title":"Impact of the SSO-ASTRO margin guideline on rates of re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer: a meta-analysis.","volume":"26","author":"Havel","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"10","key":"srv200004r71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3250","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-015-4666-1","article-title":"Assessment of practice patterns following publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving therapy in stage i and ii invasive breast cancer.","volume":"22","author":"DeSnyder","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"srv200004r72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.04.005","article-title":"Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM): a systematic review of patient reported factors and psychological predictors influencing choice and satisfaction.","volume":"28","author":"Ager","year":"2016","journal-title":"Breast"},{"issue":"3","key":"srv200004r73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.4749","article-title":"Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy decisions in a population-based sample of patients with early-stage breast cancer.","volume":"152","author":"Jagsi","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"srv200004r74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3518","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-017-6013-1","article-title":"Surgeon and radiation oncologist views on omission of adjuvant radiotherapy for older women with early-stage breast cancer.","volume":"24","author":"Shumway","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"srv200004r75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"884","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijrobp.2017.01.210","article-title":"Use of Geriatric assessment tools in selecting therapies in women aged =70 years with hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer: preliminary experience with a quality improvement initiative.","volume":"98","author":"Wright","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys"}],"container-title":["JAMA Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamasurgery\/articlepdf\/2766662\/jamasurgery_wang_2020_rv_200004_1597783664.52349.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,18]],"date-time":"2021-03-18T12:51:08Z","timestamp":1616071868000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamasurgery\/fullarticle\/2766662"}},"subtitle":["A Systematic Review"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,1]]},"references-count":75,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamasurg.2020.0322","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-6254"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-6254","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,1]]}}}