{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T18:46:11Z","timestamp":1790707571804,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Importance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A laparoscopic approach for adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) requiring surgery provides quicker recovery compared with open surgery, but benefits in long-term follow-up are unclear.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare SBO recurrence, incisional hernia, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes in long-term follow-up after laparoscopic vs open surgery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The Laparoscopic vs Open Adhesiolysis for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction (LASSO) randomized clinical trial was conducted in 8 hospitals in Finland and Italy between July 2013 and April 2018. In this study, the 5-year follow-up is reported. This was an international, multicenter, parallel, open-label randomized clinical trial including patients with clinical and radiological signs of adhesive SBO not resolving by conservative means. Study data were analyzed from February to May 2025.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Interventions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Open vs laparoscopic adhesiolysis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Main Outcomes and Measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>SBO recurrence rate, incisional hernia incidence and QOL (Gastrointestinal Quality Of Life Index [GIQLI] and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-36]) within 5 years are reported using modified intention-to-treat and post hoc per-protocol analyses.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 104 patients were randomized, and 100 (mean [SD] age, 69.2 [15.7] years; 65 female [65%]) were included in the analyses (49 in open surgery, 51 in laparoscopic surgery). At 1 year, 1 patient (2.3%) in the open-surgery group had recurrent SBO vs 2 patients (4.5%) in the laparoscopy group (odds ratio [OR], 2.05; 95% CI, 0.18-23.44;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;amp;gt;.99). Within 5 years, 3 patients (9.7%) in the open-surgery group had at least 1 recurrent SBO vs 4 patients (12.5%) in the laparoscopy group (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.27-6.51;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;amp;gt;.99). Incisional hernias were detected in 2 patients (6.1%) in the open-surgery group vs 2 patients (6.3%) in the laparoscopy group (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.14-7.82;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;amp;gt;.99). At 5-year follow-up, median (IQR) SF-36 score was 73.2 (52.8-85.9) in the open-surgery group and 67.1 (42.6-76.7) in the laparoscopy group (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u2009.23), and median (IQR) GIQLI scores were 118 (95-136) in the open-surgery group and 119 (102-129) in the laparoscopy group (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u2009.54).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Results of this randomized clinical trial reveal that, although the laparoscopic approach to adhesive SBO has small short-term benefits, it was not superior to open surgery based on long-term follow-up.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Trial Registration<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:\n                      <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/study\/NCT01867528\">NCT01867528<\/jats:ext-link>\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2025.6726","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,18]],"date-time":"2026-02-18T16:30:27Z","timestamp":1771432227000},"page":"381","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Long-Term Outcomes After Laparoscopic vs Open Adhesiolysis for Small Bowel Obstruction"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"161","author":[{"given":"Panu","family":"R\u00e4ty","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Abdominal Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Panu","family":"Mentula","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Abdominal Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eija","family":"Haukij\u00e4rvi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Risto","family":"Juusela","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Heidi","family":"Wikstr\u00f6m","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Peijas Hospital, Vantaa, Finland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vesa","family":"Koivukangas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Berndt","family":"Enholm","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, P\u00e4ij\u00e4t-H\u00e4me Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Salomone","family":"Di Saverio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Maggiore Hospital Bologna, Bologna, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arianna","family":"Birindelli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fausto","family":"Catena","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Bologna, Bufalini Hospital Cesena, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ari","family":"Lepp\u00e4niemi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Abdominal Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ville","family":"Sallinen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Abdominal Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland"},{"name":"Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10","reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"soi250101r1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.0480","article-title":"Use of national burden to define operative emergency general surgery.","volume":"151","author":"Scott","year":"2016","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"soi250101r2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"f5588","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.f5588","article-title":"Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"347","author":"ten Broek","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"3","key":"soi250101r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znaf025","article-title":"Development and external validation of prediction risk scores (STRISK and NOFA) to predict immediate surgical need in adhesive small bowel obstruction: an observational prospective multicenter study.","volume":"112","author":"R\u00e4ty","year":"2025","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"soi250101r4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2016.01.030","article-title":"A systematic review comparing laparoscopic vs open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesional small bowel obstruction.","volume":"212","author":"Sajid","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"soi250101r5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3432","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-015-4114-0","article-title":"Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for acute small bowel obstruction: systematic review and pooled analysis.","volume":"29","author":"Wiggins","year":"2015","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"5","key":"soi250101r6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"779","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2012.03.005","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"204","author":"Li","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"soi250101r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007511.pub2","article-title":"Laparoscopic vs open surgery in small bowel obstruction.","volume":"2010","author":"Cirocchi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"12","key":"soi250101r8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5348","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-017-5615-9","article-title":"Does laparoscopic adhesiolysis decrease the risk of recurrent symptoms in small bowel obstruction: a propensity score-matched analysis.","volume":"31","author":"Yao","year":"2017","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"2","key":"soi250101r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.7602\/jmis.2020.23.2.86","article-title":"Does laparoscopic adhesiolysis reduce the risk of small bowel obstruction related readmissions and reoperations compared with open adhesiolysis?","volume":"23","author":"Park","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"soi250101r10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1683","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-014-2572-7","article-title":"Laparoscopic approach to appendectomy reduces the incidence of short- and long-term postoperative bowel obstruction: systematic review and pooled analysis.","volume":"18","author":"Markar","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"soi250101r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1633","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gassur.2024.07.023","article-title":"Laparoscopic repair vs open repair for perforated peptic ulcers: quality of life assessment.","volume":"28","author":"Ertekin","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"soi250101r12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1016\/S2468-1253(19)30016-0","article-title":"Laparoscopic vs Open Adhesiolysis for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction (LASSO): an international, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial.","volume":"4","author":"Sallinen","year":"2019","journal-title":"Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"issue":"77","key":"soi250101r13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2482-14-77","article-title":"Laparoscopic vs Open Adhesiolysis for Small Bowel Obstruction: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.","volume":"14","author":"Sallinen","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"soi250101r14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-022-01613-w","article-title":"Inference following multiple imputation for generalized additive models: an investigation of the median P value rule with applications to the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry and Colorado COVID-19 hospitalization data.","volume":"22","author":"Bolt","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"1","key":"soi250101r15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-022-01693-8","article-title":"A simple pooling method for variable selection in multiply imputed datasets outperformed complex methods.","volume":"22","author":"Panken","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"4","key":"soi250101r16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/geroni\/igz036","article-title":"Effect size guidelines, sample size calculations, and statistical power in gerontology.","volume":"3","author":"Brydges","year":"2019","journal-title":"Innov Aging"},{"issue":"6","key":"soi250101r17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"866","DOI":"10.1097\/TA.0000000000002684","article-title":"Laparoscopic vs Open Approach for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction, a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.","volume":"88","author":"Krielen","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Trauma Acute Care Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"soi250101r18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1186\/s13017-023-00520-9","article-title":"Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.","volume":"18","author":"Sermonesi","year":"2023","journal-title":"World J Emerg Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"soi250101r19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2018.5248","article-title":"Association of surgical intervention for adhesive small-bowel obstruction with the risk of recurrence.","volume":"154","author":"Behman","year":"2019","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"soi250101r20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1007\/s10029-025-03347-2","article-title":"Incisional hernia incidence following laparoscopic vs open abdominal surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","volume":"29","author":"Perim","year":"2025","journal-title":"Hernia"},{"issue":"2","key":"soi250101r21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs5.5","article-title":"Nationwide population-based cohort study to assess risk of surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction following open or laparoscopic rectal cancer resection.","volume":"1","author":"Andersen","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJS Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"soi250101r22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1186\/s13017-016-0102-5","article-title":"Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes and cost-effectiveness.","volume":"11","author":"Biondi","year":"2016","journal-title":"World J Emerg Surg"}],"container-title":["JAMA Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamasurgery\/articlepdf\/2845374\/jamasurgery_rty_2026_oi_250101_1773954896.03827.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,8]],"date-time":"2026-04-08T15:01:04Z","timestamp":1775660464000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamasurgery\/fullarticle\/2845374"}},"subtitle":["The LASSO Randomized Clinical Trial"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamasurg.2025.6726","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-6254"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-6254","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]]}}}