{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]],"date-time":"2026-09-10T02:08:53Z","timestamp":1789006133030,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":55,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"8","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Importance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Positive margins occur in 12% to 30% of breast-conserving surgeries and are associated with increased local recurrence risks. Accurate and efficient intraoperative margin assessment, therefore, remains an unmet clinical need.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To evaluate the success rate of intraoperative specimen positron emission tomography (PET)\u2013computed tomography (CT) imaging in addressing positive margins in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This was an interventional, multicenter, nonrandomized clinical trial that recruited patients from June 2022 to March 2025. Patients were followed up 2 weeks after surgery. Six European breast cancer centers participated and integrated specimen PET-CT imaging into their routine surgical flow. The analysis included eligible patients with early-stage breast cancer scheduled for breast-conserving surgery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Interventions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Patients received an intravenous injection of low-dose\n                      <jats:sup>18<\/jats:sup>\n                      F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG; 0.8 MBq\/kg). After tumor excision, the specimen was imaged intraoperatively using a dedicated specimen PET-CT scanner. Surgeons interpreted PET-CT images intraoperatively, and additional tissue was excised when margins were deemed suspicious to achieve final negative margins.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Main Outcomes and Measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The primary outcome was the success rate of specimen PET-CT in addressing positive margins for the invasive component in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery for invasive ductal carcinoma. Secondary outcomes included success rates in other breast cancer subtypes, final positive margin rates, reoperation rates, and diagnostic performance using histopathology as the reference standard.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The analysis cohort consisted of 148 female patients with a median (IQR) age of 65 (53-73) years and a median (IQR) preoperative tumor size of 17 (12-22) mm. For the invasive component of invasive ductal carcinoma, success rates increased from 83.3% (70 of 84 patients) without intraoperative margin assessment (IMA) to 86.9% (73 of 84 patients) with routine margin assessment and to 95.2% (80 of 84 patients) with specimen PET-CT (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;amp;lt; .001 vs no IMA). Across all study groups, success rates improved from 76.4% (113 of 148 patients) without IMA to 81.8% (121 of 148 patients) with routine margin assessment techniques and to 91.9% (136 of 148 patients) with specimen PET-CT (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;amp;lt; .001 vs no IMA;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .009 vs standard-of-care IMA).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Study findings show that specimen PET-CT imaging was associated with an improvement in the assessment of positive margins for invasive component in patients undergoing conserving surgery for early breast cancer. The use of this integrated approach might lead to a substantial reduction of re-excision rates after breast-conserving surgery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Trial Registration<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:\n                      <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/study\/NCT04999917\">NCT04999917<\/jats:ext-link>\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2026.2090","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,17]],"date-time":"2026-06-17T15:30:30Z","timestamp":1781710230000},"page":"785","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Specimen PET-CT Imaging for Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Early-Stage Breast Cancer"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"161","author":[{"given":"Menekse","family":"G\u00f6ker","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium"},{"name":"Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Markus","family":"Hahn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Women\u2019s Health, University Hospital T\u00fcbingen, T\u00fcbingen, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ximena Elzo","family":"Kraemer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Integrated Cancer Center Ghent, Department of Medical Oncology, Maria Middelares Hospital, Ghent, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hakima","family":"Harrach","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Interdisciplinary Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marian","family":"Vanhoeij","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oncological, Thoracic and Transplant Surgery, UZ Brussel (University Hospital Brussels), Brussels, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Glenn","family":"Vergauwen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium"},{"name":"Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Koen","family":"Van de Vijver","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium"},{"name":"Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kathia","family":"De Man","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium"},{"name":"Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fabian","family":"Schmidt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Women\u2019s Health, University Hospital T\u00fcbingen, T\u00fcbingen, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Selin","family":"Guergan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Women\u2019s Health, University Hospital T\u00fcbingen, T\u00fcbingen, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Val\u00e9rie","family":"Vergucht","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General Surgery, Maria Middelares Hospital, Ghent, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rosa","family":"Di Micco","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Breast Surgery Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giovanni","family":"Cisternino","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Breast Surgery Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Oreste Davide","family":"Gentilini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Breast Surgery Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy"},{"name":"San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10","reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"soi260034r1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzae043","article-title":"A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy in terms of patient survival rate and quality of life in breast cancer.","volume":"36","author":"Li","year":"2024","journal-title":"Int J Qual Health Care"},{"issue":"16","key":"soi260034r2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1227","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa020989","article-title":"Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer.","volume":"347","author":"Veronesi","year":"2002","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"8","key":"soi260034r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1194","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdz173","article-title":"Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up\u2020.","volume":"30","author":"Cardoso","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"},{"key":"soi260034r4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1178223421993459","article-title":"Intraoperative evaluation of resection margins in breast-conserving surgery for in situ and invasive breast carcinoma.","volume":"15","author":"Koopmansch","year":"2021","journal-title":"Breast Cancer (Auckl)"},{"issue":"15","key":"soi260034r5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2466","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2008.19.8424","article-title":"Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrences in patients treated by breast-conserving therapy in 5 National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocols of node-negative breast cancer.","volume":"27","author":"Anderson","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"soi260034r6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1238","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-019-07247-5","article-title":"Impact of the SSO-ASTRO Margin Guideline on rates of re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer: a meta-analysis.","volume":"26","author":"Havel","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"soi260034r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17344","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-74373-6","article-title":"Accuracy of gross intraoperative margin assessment for breast cancer: experience since the SSO-ASTRO margin consensus guidelines.","volume":"10","author":"Nunez","year":"2020","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"14","key":"soi260034r8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1507","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2013.53.3935","article-title":"Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer.","volume":"32","author":"Moran","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"8","key":"soi260034r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1668","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2000.18.8.1668","article-title":"Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence.","volume":"18","author":"Park","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"soi260034r10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e595","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clbc.2018.04.004","article-title":"Tumor resection margin definitions in breast-conserving surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature.","volume":"18","author":"Brouwer de Koning","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Breast Cancer"},{"key":"soi260034r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2022-070346","article-title":"Margin status and survival outcomes after breast cancer conservation surgery: prospectively registered systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"378","author":"Bundred","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"3","key":"soi260034r12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2014.12.003","article-title":"Overall survival in patients with a re-excision following breast conserving surgery compared to those without in a large population-based cohort.","volume":"51","author":"Vos","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"issue":"4","key":"soi260034r13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.23990","article-title":"Margin re-excision and local recurrence in invasive breast cancer: a cost analysis using a decision tree model.","volume":"112","author":"Abe","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"17","key":"soi260034r14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2930","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers16172930","article-title":"Risk factors for positive resection margins in breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer-retrospective analysis.","volume":"16","author":"Georgescu","year":"2024","journal-title":"Cancers (Basel)"},{"issue":"4","key":"soi260034r15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.11050","article-title":"Patient-level costs in margin re-excision for breast-conserving surgery.","volume":"106","author":"Grant","year":"2019","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"soi260034r16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1831","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-015-5067-1","article-title":"Do patients after re-excision due to involved or close margins have the same risk of local recurrence as those after 1-step breast-conserving surgery?","volume":"23","author":"Hennigs","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"soi260034r17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semdp.2024.06.005","article-title":"Intraoperative evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer.","volume":"41","author":"Kopicky","year":"2024","journal-title":"Semin Diagn Pathol"},{"issue":"1","key":"soi260034r18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18440","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-23234-5","article-title":"Specimen mammography for intraoperative margin assessment in breast conserving surgery: a meta-analysis.","volume":"12","author":"Lin","year":"2022","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"4","key":"soi260034r19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2012.10.006","article-title":"Ultrasound-guided excision combined with intraoperative assessment of gross macroscopic margins decreases the rate of reoperations for non-palpable invasive breast cancer.","volume":"22","author":"Ramos","year":"2013","journal-title":"Breast"},{"issue":"1","key":"soi260034r20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/715404","article-title":"The value of intraoperative frozen section analysis for margin status in breast conservation surgery in a nontertiary institution.","volume":"2014","author":"Tan","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Breast Cancer"},{"issue":"3","key":"soi260034r21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0248768","article-title":"Accuracy of frozen section in intraoperative margin assessment for breast-conserving surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"16","author":"Garcia","year":"2021","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"3","key":"soi260034r22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1007\/s12609-022-00450-6","article-title":"Intraoperative margin trials in breast cancer.","volume":"14","author":"Armani","year":"2022","journal-title":"Curr Breast Cancer Rep"},{"issue":"7","key":"soi260034r23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4097","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-023-13364-z","article-title":"Breast-conserving surgery margin guidance using micro-computed tomography: challenges when imaging radiodense resection specimens.","volume":"30","author":"Streeter","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"10","key":"soi260034r24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1117\/1.JBO.23.10.100901","article-title":"Review of methods for intraoperative margin detection for breast conserving surgery.","volume":"23","author":"Maloney","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Biomed Opt"},{"issue":"2","key":"soi260034r25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2290-1543","article-title":"Ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery compared with conventional breast-conserving surgery.","volume":"46","author":"Boeer","year":"2025","journal-title":"Ultraschall Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"soi260034r26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1055\/a-1821-8559","article-title":"Intraoperative ultrasound-guided excision of non-palpable and palpable breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"43","author":"Banys-Paluchowski","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ultraschall Med"},{"key":"soi260034r27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2024.103749","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative methods for margin assessment in breast cancer surgery: a systematic review & meta-analysis.","volume":"76","author":"Dowling","year":"2024","journal-title":"Breast"},{"issue":"10","key":"soi260034r28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1560","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2021.12.006","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of radiography, digital breast tomosynthesis, micro-CT and ultrasound for margin assessment during breast surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"29","author":"Manhoobi","year":"2022","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"soi260034r29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001897","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative techniques for margin assessment in breast cancer surgery: a meta-analysis.","volume":"265","author":"St John","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"soi260034r30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/advs.201901519","article-title":"Emerging technologies for real-time intraoperative margin assessment in future breast-conserving surgery.","volume":"7","author":"Pradipta","year":"2020","journal-title":"Adv Sci (Weinh)"},{"issue":"6","key":"soi260034r31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1586\/17434440.5.6.663","article-title":"Bringing advanced medical imaging into the operative arena could revolutionize the surgical care of cancer patients.","volume":"5","author":"Hall","year":"2008","journal-title":"Expert Rev Med Devices"},{"issue":"1","key":"soi260034r32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1038\/s41523-025-00797-w","article-title":"Supporting intraoperative margin assessment using deep learning for automatic tumor segmentation in breast lumpectomy micro-PET-CT.","volume":"11","author":"Maris","year":"2025","journal-title":"NPJ Breast Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"soi260034r33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1186\/s40658-024-00681-9","article-title":"Method for coregistration of high-resolution specimen PET-CT with histopathology to improve insight into radiotracer distributions.","volume":"11","author":"Maris","year":"2024","journal-title":"EJNMMI Phys"},{"issue":"1","key":"soi260034r34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1038\/s41523-025-00818-8","article-title":"Breast cancer Intraoperative Margin Assessment using specimen PET-CT (BIMAP).","volume":"11","author":"De Crem","year":"2025","journal-title":"NPJ Breast Cancer"},{"issue":"5","key":"soi260034r35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1080\/00015458.2020.1774163","article-title":"18F-FDG micro-PET\/CT for intra-operative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery.","volume":"120","author":"G\u00f6ker","year":"2020","journal-title":"Acta Chir Belg"},{"issue":"8","key":"soi260034r36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2979","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-025-07143-z","article-title":"Feasibility study on the implementation of a mobile high-resolution PET\/CT scanner for surgical specimens: exploring clinical applications and practical considerations.","volume":"52","author":"Lambert","year":"2025","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"issue":"10","key":"soi260034r37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1515","DOI":"10.5858\/133.10.1515","article-title":"Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with invasive carcinoma of the breast.","volume":"133","author":"Lester","year":"2009","journal-title":"Arch Pathol Lab Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"soi260034r38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.5858\/133.1.15","article-title":"Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.","volume":"133","author":"Lester","year":"2009","journal-title":"Arch Pathol Lab Med"},{"issue":"11","key":"soi260034r39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-012799","article-title":"STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.","volume":"6","author":"Cohen","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"2","key":"soi260034r40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.86.2.420","article-title":"Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.","volume":"86","author":"Shrout","year":"1979","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"},{"issue":"2","key":"soi260034r41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcm.2016.02.012","article-title":"A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research.","volume":"15","author":"Koo","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Chiropr Med"},{"key":"soi260034r42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2021.04.007","article-title":"Preoperative non-palpable breast lesion localization, innovative techniques and clinical outcomes in surgical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"58","author":"Garzotto","year":"2021","journal-title":"Breast"},{"issue":"1","key":"soi260034r43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1038\/s41523-025-00756-5","article-title":"Impact of margin distance on recurrence and survival following breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy.","volume":"11","author":"Pop","year":"2025","journal-title":"NPJ Breast Cancer"},{"issue":"5","key":"soi260034r44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bjsopen\/zrae100","article-title":"Surgical outcomes of neoadjuvant endocrine treatment in early breast cancer: meta-analysis.","volume":"8","author":"Brett","year":"2024","journal-title":"BJS Open"},{"issue":"17","key":"soi260034r45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2342","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2010.31.6950","article-title":"Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2 to 3 breast cancer: clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype\u2014ACOSOG Z1031.","volume":"29","author":"Ellis","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"soi260034r46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.4751","article-title":"Reoperation rates in ductal carcinoma in situ vs invasive breast cancer after wire-guided breast-conserving surgery.","volume":"152","author":"Langhans","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"soi260034r47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2127","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-023-06153-z","article-title":"Direct coregistration of [18F]FDG uptake and histopathology in surgically excised malignancies of the head and neck: a feasibility study.","volume":"50","author":"Debacker","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"issue":"9","key":"soi260034r48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5341","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-023-13592-3","article-title":"The impact of breast-conserving surgery re-excision on patient-reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q.","volume":"30","author":"Matar-Ujvary","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"soi260034r49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3649","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-024-14902-z","article-title":"Contemporary analysis of reexcision and conversion to mastectomy rates and associated health care costs for women undergoing breast-conserving surgery.","volume":"31","author":"Kim","year":"2024","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"10","key":"soi260034r50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6288","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-022-12127-6","article-title":"Economic impact of reducing reexcision rates after breast-conserving surgery in a large, integrated health system.","volume":"29","author":"Chakedis","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"soi260034r51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1589","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-014-3602-0","article-title":"A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of MarginProbe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies.","volume":"21","author":"Schnabel","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"10","key":"soi260034r52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3356","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-015-4665-2","article-title":"Intraoperative assessment of final margins with a handheld optical imaging probe during breast-conserving surgery may reduce the reoperation rate: results of a multicenter study.","volume":"22","author":"Zysk","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"soi260034r53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euros.2023.05.017","article-title":"Intraoperative molecular positron emission tomography imaging for intraoperative assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens.","volume":"54","author":"Darr","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur Urol Open Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"soi260034r54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.3390\/biomedicines11020645","article-title":"First live-experience session with PET\/CT specimen imager: a pilot analysis in prostate cancer and neuroendocrine tumor.","volume":"11","author":"Muraglia","year":"2023","journal-title":"Biomedicines"},{"key":"soi260034r55","volume-title":"Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation\u2014Vol 1: Sources","author":"United Nations","year":"2001"}],"container-title":["JAMA Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamasurgery\/articlepdf\/2850515\/jamasurgery_gker_2026_oi_260034_1785955383.9852.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,12]],"date-time":"2026-08-12T15:00:44Z","timestamp":1786546844000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamasurgery\/fullarticle\/2850515"}},"subtitle":["The BrIMA Nonrandomized Clinical Trial"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]]},"references-count":55,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamasurg.2026.2090","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-6254"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-6254","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]]}}}