{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T02:55:19Z","timestamp":1791428119417,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JAMA Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"ab-soi260070-4\">\n                    <jats:title>Importance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In the era of modern systemic chemotherapy, the optimal treatment strategy for gastric cancer with positive peritoneal lavage cytology (CY1) and\/or localized peritoneal metastasis (P1a) remains controversial.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-soi260070-5\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To explore the optimal treatment strategy for patients with gastric cancer with CY1 and\/or P1a by comparing the outcomes of various therapeutic strategies.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-soi260070-6\">\n                    <jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This cohort study was a retrospective multicenter study set in 48 institutions of the Stomach Cancer Study Group in the Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Participants were patients with gastric cancer with CY1 and\/or P1a, but no other distant metastases, who were treated in 2016 to 2022. Data were analyzed from July 2025 to May 2026.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-soi260070-7\">\n                    <jats:title>Exposure<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Patients were stratified according to initial treatment: upfront gastrectomy (n\u2009=\u2009838 [71%]) or upfront chemotherapy (n\u2009=\u2009343 [29%]). The upfront chemotherapy group was further subdivided into chemotherapy alone (n\u2009=\u2009205), gastrectomy after conversion to P0CY0 (n\u2009=\u200992), and nonconversion gastrectomy (n\u2009=\u200946) according to preoperative chemotherapy efficacy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-soi260070-8\">\n                    <jats:title>Main Outcomes and Measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes included progression-free survival.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-soi260070-9\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Among 1181 patients, the median (IQR) age was 72 (65-78) years; 725 patients (61%) were male and 456 (39%) were female. The overall 5-year OS rate was 25.0% (95% CI, 22.3%-28.0%), with a median survival time of 24.3 months. Upfront gastrectomy showed a significantly longer OS than upfront chemotherapy (5-year OS: 27.6% vs 19.0%; hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.93;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u2009.004). Among the multimodal treatment strategies, upfront chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy showed a significantly higher 5-year OS rate than upfront gastrectomy with postoperative chemotherapy (39.9%; 95% CI, 31.7%-50.2%, vs 31.4%; 95% CI, 27.6%-35.8%;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u2009.01). Gastrectomy alone and chemotherapy alone showed poor prognoses (10.3% and 3.2%, respectively). Notably, survival after gastrectomy following conversion to P0CY0 was the most favorable (5-year OS: 50.5%), whereas that without P0CY0 was modest (5-year OS: 17.2%).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"ab-soi260070-10\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study found that for gastric cancer with CY1 and\/or P1a, upfront chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy resulted in a slightly higher 5-year OS rate than upfront gastrectomy followed by postoperative chemotherapy. Because gastrectomy after conversion to P0CY0 was associated with the most favorable survival, the development of more effective preoperative chemotherapy is warranted.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2026.4647","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T15:00:34Z","timestamp":1791385234000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Treatment Outcomes for Gastric Cancer With Positive Peritoneal Lavage Cytology or Localized Peritoneal Metastasis"],"prefix":"10.1001","author":[{"given":"Keiichi","family":"Fujiya","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi-Cho, Sunto-Gun, Shizuoka, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Masanori","family":"Tokunaga","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kazuyoshi","family":"Yamamoto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Souya","family":"Nunobe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yasuyuki","family":"Kawachi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Nagaoka Chuo General Hospital, Niigata, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yasuhiro","family":"Yuasa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokushima Red Cross Hospital, Tokushima, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mikihiro","family":"Kano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Digestive Surgery, Hiroshima City North Medical Center Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yukinori","family":"Kurokawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Narikazu","family":"Boku","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oncology and General Medicine, IMSUT Hospital, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Takaki","family":"Yoshikawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan"},{"name":"Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"soi260070r1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(99)00162-2","article-title":"Intraoperative lavage for cytological examination in 1,297 patients with gastric carcinoma.","volume":"178","author":"Bando","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"soi260070r2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1245\/ASO.2005.03.065","article-title":"The value of peritoneal cytology as a preoperative predictor in patients with gastric carcinoma undergoing a curative resection.","volume":"12","author":"Bentrem","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"soi260070r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1007\/s10120-012-0156-3","article-title":"Long-term follow up of patients who were positive for peritoneal lavage cytology: final report from the CCOG0301 study.","volume":"15","author":"Kodera","year":"2012","journal-title":"Gastric Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"soi260070r4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-019-07697-x","article-title":"Efficacy of postoperative chemotherapy after resection that leaves no macroscopically visible disease of gastric cancer with positive peritoneal lavage cytology (CY1) or localized peritoneum metastasis (P1a): a multicenter retrospective study.","volume":"27","author":"Yamaguchi","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"soi260070r6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1186\/s12957-021-02351-x","article-title":"Gastric cancer with positive peritoneal cytology: survival benefit after induction chemotherapy and conversion to negative peritoneal cytology.","volume":"19","author":"Valletti","year":"2021","journal-title":"World J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"10","key":"soi260070r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1005","DOI":"10.1016\/j.annonc.2022.07.004","article-title":"Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.","volume":"33","author":"Lordick","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"soi260070r8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1007\/s10120-025-01698-4","article-title":"Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2025 (7th edition).","volume":"29","author":"Japanese Gastric Cancer Association","year":"2026","journal-title":"Gastric Cancer"},{"issue":"3","key":"soi260070r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1007\/s10120-020-01137-6","article-title":"Impact of preoperative chemotherapy as initial treatment for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis limited to positive peritoneal lavage cytology (CY1) or localized peritoneal metastasis (P1a): a multi-institutional retrospective study.","volume":"24","author":"Yamaguchi","year":"2021","journal-title":"Gastric Cancer"},{"issue":"9742","key":"soi260070r10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(10)61121-X","article-title":"Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.","volume":"376","author":"Bang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"11","key":"soi260070r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1224","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(14)70420-6","article-title":"Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial.","volume":"15","author":"Wilke","year":"2014","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"issue":"10294","key":"soi260070r12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(21)00797-2","article-title":"First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.","volume":"398","author":"Janjigian","year":"2021","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"11","key":"soi260070r13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1181","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(23)00515-6","article-title":"Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (KEYNOTE-859): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.","volume":"24","author":"Rha","year":"2023","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"soi260070r14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(21)00692-6","article-title":"Nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative, untreated, unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ATTRACTION-4): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.","volume":"23","author":"Kang","year":"2022","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"issue":"10389","key":"soi260070r15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1655","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(23)00620-7","article-title":"Zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, untreated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (SPOTLIGHT): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.","volume":"401","author":"Shitara","year":"2023","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"8","key":"soi260070r16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2133","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-023-02465-7","article-title":"Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX in CLDN18.2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the randomized, phase 3 GLOW trial.","volume":"29","author":"Shah","year":"2023","journal-title":"Nat Med"},{"issue":"15","key":"soi260070r17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1296","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.18.01138","article-title":"Addition of docetaxel to oral fluoropyrimidine improves efficacy in patients with stage III gastric cancer: interim analysis of JACCRO GC-07, a randomized controlled trial.","volume":"37","author":"Yoshida","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"soi260070r19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1007\/s10120-011-0041-5","article-title":"Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition.","volume":"14","author":"Japanese Gastric Cancer Association","year":"2011","journal-title":"Gastric Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"soi260070r20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1186\/s12957-023-03085-8","article-title":"Efficacy of chemotherapy versus surgery as initial treatment for gastric cancer with positive peritoneal cytology.","volume":"21","author":"Li","year":"2023","journal-title":"World J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"10","key":"soi260070r21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2684","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-008-0055-3","article-title":"Does neoadjuvant treatment for gastric cancer patients with positive peritoneal cytology at staging laparoscopy improve survival?","volume":"15","author":"Badgwell","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"12","key":"soi260070r22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3173","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-010-1183-0","article-title":"Positive peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer: natural history and outcome of 291 patients.","volume":"17","author":"Mezhir","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"soi260070r23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1007\/s10120-017-0749-y","article-title":"Prognostic significance of peritoneal lavage cytology in staging gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"21","author":"Jamel","year":"2018","journal-title":"Gastric Cancer"},{"issue":"3","key":"soi260070r24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1016\/j.annonc.2020.11.017","article-title":"A randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant single-agent S1, S-1 with oxaliplatin, and postoperative chemoradiation with S-1 and oxaliplatin in patients with node-positive gastric cancer after D2 resection: the ARTIST 2 trial.","volume":"32","author":"Park","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"soi260070r26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"563","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-009-0355-1","article-title":"Significance of lavage cytology in advanced gastric cancer patients.","volume":"34","author":"Fukagawa","year":"2010","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"soi260070r27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7812","article-title":"Prognostic significance of peritoneal washing cytology in patients with gastric cancer.","volume":"99","author":"Lee","year":"2012","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"soi260070r28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AS9.0000000000000607","article-title":"A multicenter collaborative survey of peritoneal lavage cytology in gastric cancer surgery: interinstitutional methodological differences and positive rate.","volume":"6","author":"Fujiya","year":"2025","journal-title":"Ann Surg Open"},{"key":"soi260070r18","volume-title":"TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours","author":"Brierley","year":"2017","edition":"8th ed"},{"key":"soi260070r25","first-page":"1","article-title":"Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2021 (6th edition).","volume-title":"Gastric Cancer","author":"Japanese Gastric Cancer Association","year":"2023"},{"key":"soi260070r5","unstructured":"National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: version 2.2026. Accessed September 3, 2026. https:\/\/www.nccn.org\/guidelines\/guidelines-detail?category=1&id=1434"}],"container-title":["JAMA Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamasurgery\/articlepdf\/2854884\/jamasurgery_fujiya_2026_oi_260070_1790709067.36457.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T15:00:36Z","timestamp":1791385236000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamasurgery\/fullarticle\/2854884"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]]},"references-count":28,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamasurg.2026.4647","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-6254"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-6254","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]]}}}