{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,26]],"date-time":"2025-10-26T14:45:49Z","timestamp":1761489949311},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"American Medical Association (AMA)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"DOI":"10.1001\/journalofethics.2016.18.4.ecas3-1604","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,4,28]],"date-time":"2016-04-28T04:16:41Z","timestamp":1461817001000},"page":"373-383","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Is Proxy Consent for an Invasive Procedure on a Patient with Intellectual Disabilities Ethically Sufficient?"],"prefix":"10.1001","volume":"18","member":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,4,1]]},"container-title":["AMA Journal of Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journalofethics.ama-assn.org\/article\/proxy-consent-invasive-procedure-patient-intellectual-disabilities-ethically-sufficient-commentary-1\/2016-04","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,10]],"date-time":"2023-05-10T16:03:14Z","timestamp":1683734594000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journalofethics.ama-assn.org\/article\/proxy-consent-invasive-procedure-patient-intellectual-disabilities-ethically-sufficient-commentary-1\/2016-04"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,4,1]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,4,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1001\/journalofethics.2016.18.4.ecas3-1604"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/journalofethics.2016.18.4.ecas3-1604","relation":{},"ISSN":["2376-6980"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2376-6980","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,4,1]]}}}