{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,30]],"date-time":"2026-08-30T21:23:12Z","timestamp":1788124992457,"version":"build-2803163510"},"update-to":[{"DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.cd006003","type":"new_version","label":"New version","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2007,4,18]],"date-time":"2007-04-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1176854400000}}],"reference-count":71,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["wiley.com","cochranelibrary.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.cd006003.pub2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,4,3]],"date-time":"2007-04-03T23:45:17Z","timestamp":1175643917000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["Routine abdominal drainage for uncomplicated open cholecystectomy"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"2010","author":[{"given":"Kurinchi Selvan","family":"Gurusamy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Royal Free Hospital and University College School of Medicine; University Department of Surgery; 9th Floor, Royal Free Hospital Pond Street London UK NW3 2QG"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kumarakrishnan","family":"Samraj","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"John Radcliffe Hospital; Department of General Surgery; Oxford UK OX3 9DU"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2007,4,18]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0001|cit1","first-page":"9","article-title":"Cholecystectomy with or without prophylactic drainage. Randomised prospective study of 200 cases","volume":"16","author":"Adloff","year":"1987","journal-title":"Medecine & Chirurgie Digestives"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0002|cit2","first-page":"274","article-title":"Drainage after cholecystectomy. A prospective randomized clinical trial","volume":"77","author":"al-Arfaj","year":"1992","journal-title":"International Surgery"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0003|cit3","first-page":"358","article-title":"The new ReliaVac drain after cholecystectomy. A comparative clinical and ultrasonic trial","volume":"30","author":"Bartolo","year":"1985","journal-title":"Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0004|cit4","first-page":"325","article-title":"Passive tube and suction drainage after elective cholecystectomy - a comparison using ultrasonography","volume":"37","author":"Brewster","year":"1992","journal-title":"Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0005|cit5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9610(82)90097-6","article-title":"Cholecystectomy with and without drainage. A randomized, prospective study of 300 patients","volume":"143","author":"Budd","year":"1982","journal-title":"American Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0006|cit6","first-page":"322","article-title":"Cholecystectomy with and without drainage","volume":"9","author":"Chattopadhyay","year":"1990","journal-title":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0007|cit7","first-page":"79","article-title":"Elective cholecystectomy without drainage and without prophylactic antibiotics. A prospective randomized trial with clinical and bacteriological aspects","volume":"90","author":"Druart","year":"1990","journal-title":"Acta Chirurgica Belgica"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0008|cit8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9610(79)90092-8","article-title":"Intraperitoneal drains and nasogastric tubes in elective cholecystectomy. A controlled clinical trial","volume":"137","author":"Edlund","year":"1979","journal-title":"American Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0009|cit9","first-page":"558","article-title":"Routine drainage following uncomplicated, elective cholecystectomy? A prospective, randomized study","volume":"63","author":"Forster","year":"1992","journal-title":"Der Chirurg"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0010|cit10","first-page":"183","article-title":"A randomised prospective trial of two drainage methods after cholecystectomy","volume":"64","author":"Fraser","year":"1982","journal-title":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0011|cit11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800630407","article-title":"A controlled trial of drainage after cholecystectomy","volume":"63","author":"Gordon","year":"1976","journal-title":"The British Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0012|cit12","first-page":"48","article-title":"Drainage after cholecystectomy. A controlled trial","volume":"34","author":"Huguier","year":"1980","journal-title":"Annales de Chirurgie"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0013|cit13","first-page":"146","article-title":"Influence of intraperitoneal drainage after cholecystectomy; a prospective ultrasonographic study","volume":"13","author":"Kriplani","year":"1992","journal-title":"Tropical Gastroenterology"},{"issue":"20","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0014|cit14","first-page":"1187","article-title":"Elective cholecystectomy with and without subhepatic drainage. A controlled, prospective study","volume":"116","author":"Kupczyk-Joeris","year":"1991","journal-title":"Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0015|cit15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.5144\/0256-4947.1989.36","article-title":"Cholecystectomy without drainage: a controlled clinical trial","volume":"9","author":"Latif","year":"1989","journal-title":"Annals of Saudi Medicine"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0016|cit16","first-page":"304","article-title":"The conduct of cholecystectomy: incision, drainage, bacteriology and postoperative complications","volume":"25","author":"Lewis","year":"1982","journal-title":"Canadian Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0017|cit17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(05)80271-5","article-title":"Simple elective cholecystectomy: to drain or not","volume":"159","author":"Lewis","year":"1990","journal-title":"American Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0018|cit18","first-page":"528","article-title":"A prospective randomized study of drained and undrained cholecystectomies","volume":"49","author":"Locker","year":"1983","journal-title":"The American Surgeon"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0019|cit19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1445-2197.1987.tb01416.x","article-title":"A randomised comparison of three drainage systems following cholecystectomy","volume":"57","author":"Loder","year":"1987","journal-title":"The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0020|cit20","first-page":"326","article-title":"Abdominal drainage following cholecystectomy: high, low, or no suction?","volume":"65","author":"McCormack","year":"1983","journal-title":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0021|cit21","first-page":"740","article-title":"Cholecystectomy is safer without drainage: the results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial","volume":"109","author":"Monson","year":"1991","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0022|cit22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"993","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800731215","article-title":"Influence of intraperitoneal drains on subhepatic collections following cholecystectomy: a prospective clinical trial","volume":"73","author":"Monson","year":"1986","journal-title":"The British Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0023|cit23","first-page":"A1158","article-title":"Does drainage increase the risk of subhepatic collection following cholecystectomy? - a prospective study","volume":"26","author":"Monson","year":"1985","journal-title":"Gut"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0024|cit24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800720407","article-title":"Suction drainage of the gallbladder bed does not prevent complications after cholecystectomy: a random control clinical trial","volume":"72","author":"Playforth","year":"1985","journal-title":"The British Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"15-16","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0025|cit25","first-page":"1081","article-title":"[Cholecystectomy without drainage. Randomized clinical study]","volume":"39","author":"Porati","year":"1984","journal-title":"Minerva Chirurgica"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0026|cit26","first-page":"499","article-title":"Cholecystectomy with and without drainage: a prospective randomised study","volume":"70","author":"Saad","year":"1993","journal-title":"East African Medical Journal"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0027|cit27","first-page":"190","article-title":"A comparison of two types of vacuum drainage after cholecystectomy","volume":"66","author":"Salam","year":"1984","journal-title":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0028|cit28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9610(87)90585-X","article-title":"Closed-suction versus Penrose drainage after cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized evaluation","volume":"153","author":"Sarr","year":"1987","journal-title":"The American Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0029|cit29","first-page":"661","article-title":"The \"ideal\" cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study","volume":"59","author":"Schaupp","year":"1988","journal-title":"Der Chirurg"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0030|cit30","first-page":"171","article-title":"A randomized study of cholecystectomy with and without drainage","volume":"155","author":"Trowbridge","year":"1982","journal-title":"Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0031|cit31","first-page":"289","article-title":"Randomized trial of drainage after cholecystectomy. Suction versus static drainage through a main wound versus a stab incision","volume":"141","author":"Linden","year":"1980","journal-title":"American Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0032|cit32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1155\/1990\/37926","article-title":"The need of drainage after cholecystectomy","volume":"3","author":"Diez","year":"1990","journal-title":"HPB Surgery: a World Journal of Hepatic, Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0033|cit33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"678","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9610(81)90310-X","article-title":"Drainage in elective cholecystectomy","volume":"142","author":"Farha","year":"1981","journal-title":"American Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0034|cit34","first-page":"191","article-title":"The rational use of drains after cholecystectomy","volume":"146","author":"Gupta","year":"1978","journal-title":"Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0035|cit35","first-page":"983","article-title":"Efficiency of peritoneal drainage","volume":"131","author":"Hanna","year":"1970","journal-title":"Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0036|cit36","first-page":"476","article-title":"Effect of drainage on subhepatic collections and respiratory function after elective cholecystectomy","volume":"75","author":"Irwin","year":"1988","journal-title":"The British Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0037|cit37","first-page":"341","article-title":"Clinical trial of drainage following cholecystectomy: suction versus static drainage","volume":"84","author":"Jha","year":"1986","journal-title":"Journal of the Indian Medical Association"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0038|cit38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01655718","article-title":"Cholecystectomy and drainage: ultrasonographic and radioisotopic evaluation","volume":"17","author":"Kapoor","year":"1993","journal-title":"World Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0039|cit39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-4804(78)90089-6","article-title":"Cholecystectomy: to drain or not to drain. A randomized prospective study of 200 patients","volume":"24","author":"Maull","year":"1978","journal-title":"The Journal of Surgical Research"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0040|cit40","first-page":"85","article-title":"The effect of prophylactic drainage on sub-hepatic fluid collections after elective cholecystectomy - a prospective randomized ultrasonographic study","volume":"47","author":"Maull","year":"1981","journal-title":"American Surgeon"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0041|cit41","first-page":"175","article-title":"Role of intraperitoneal drains on subhepatic collection following routine uncomplicated cholecystectomy","volume":"91","author":"Peer","year":"1993","journal-title":"Journal of the Indian Medical Association"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0042|cit42","first-page":"403","article-title":"Peritoneal drainage following cholecystectomy: a controlled trial","volume":"65","author":"Ragoonanan","year":"1983","journal-title":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0043|cit43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1097\/00007611-198002000-00012","article-title":"Cholecystectomy with closed suction drainage","volume":"73","author":"Rivas","year":"1980","journal-title":"Southern Medical Journal"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0044|cit44","first-page":"134","article-title":"Passive tube and suction drainage after elective cholecystectomy: a comparison using ultrasonography","volume":"39","author":"Salam","year":"1994","journal-title":"Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0045|cit45","first-page":"269","article-title":"Cholecystectomy with or without drainage","volume":"19","author":"Salles","year":"1992","journal-title":"Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0046|cit46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1982.1.7.271","article-title":"Subhepatic sonography following cholecystectomy","volume":"1","author":"Shirazi","year":"1982","journal-title":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0047|cit47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"606","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-197806000-00004","article-title":"Abdominal drainage following appendectomy and cholecystectomy","volume":"187","author":"Stone","year":"1978","journal-title":"Annals of Surgery"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0048|cit48","first-page":"393","article-title":"Cholecystectomy with and without intraperitoneal drain","volume":"149","author":"Truedson","year":"1983","journal-title":"Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0049|cit49","first-page":"829","article-title":"Sump drainage versus static drainage after cholecystectomy","volume":"152","author":"Linden","year":"1981","journal-title":"Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0050|cit50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4780060325","article-title":"Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: strengths and limitations","volume":"6","author":"DeMets","year":"1987","journal-title":"Statistics in Medicine"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0051|cit51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(86)90046-2","article-title":"Meta-analysis in clinical trials","volume":"7","author":"DerSimonian","year":"1986","journal-title":"Controlled Clinical Trials"},{"issue":"7109","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0052|cit52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629","article-title":"Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test","volume":"315","author":"Egger","year":"1997","journal-title":"BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0053|cit53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1121","DOI":"10.1136\/gut.35.8.1121","article-title":"Prospective audit of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the west of Scotland. West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group","volume":"35","author":"Fullarton","year":"1994","journal-title":"Gut"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0054|cit54","unstructured":"Gluud C Als-Nielsen B D'Amico G Fingerhut A Gluud LL Khan S Hepato-Biliary Group About The Cochrane Collaboration (Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs))"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0055|cit55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1539","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1186","article-title":"Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis","volume":"21","author":"Higgins","year":"2002","journal-title":"Statistics in Medicine"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0056|cit56","unstructured":"Higgins JPT Green S Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 [updated September 2006] The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2006 Chichester, UK John Wiley & sons, Ltd"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0057|cit57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.4836","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis","volume":"92","author":"Johansson","year":"2005","journal-title":"The British Journal of Surgery"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0058|cit58","unstructured":"Keus F de Jong JAF Gooszen HG van Laarhoven CJHM Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0059|cit59","unstructured":"Keus F de Jong JAF Gooszen HG van Laarhoven CJHM Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0060|cit60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"982","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-135-11-200112040-00010","article-title":"Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses","volume":"135","author":"Kjaergard","year":"2001","journal-title":"Annals of Internal Medicine"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0061|cit61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.698","article-title":"A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis","volume":"20","author":"Macaskill","year":"2001","journal-title":"Statistics in Medicine"},{"issue":"9128","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0062|cit62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(98)01085-X","article-title":"Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?","volume":"352","author":"Moher","year":"1998","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0063|cit63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/21.5.837","article-title":"Intention-to-treat analysis: implications for quantitative and qualitative research","volume":"21","author":"Newell","year":"1992","journal-title":"International Journal of Epidemiology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0064|cit64","unstructured":"NIH consensus statement on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement September 14-16, 1992 http:\/\/consensus.nih.gov\/1992\/1992GallstonesLaparoscopy090html.htm"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0065|cit65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"494","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.5042","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (Br J Surg 2005; 92: 44-49)","volume":"92","author":"Rai","year":"2005","journal-title":"The British Journal of Surgery"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0066|cit66","unstructured":"Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager (RevMan) 2003"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0067|cit67","first-page":"253","article-title":"A statistical analysis of drainage versus nondrainage of elective cholecystectomy","volume":"162","author":"Ronaghan","year":"1986","journal-title":"Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0068|cit68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266462303000552","article-title":"Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches","volume":"19","author":"Royle","year":"2003","journal-title":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0069|cit69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"408","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1995.03520290060030","article-title":"Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials","volume":"273","author":"Schulz","year":"1995","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0070|cit70","unstructured":"StatsDirect Ltd StatsDirect Statistical software Version 2.4.5 2005"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2-BIB0071|cit71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1351","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1761","article-title":"What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data","volume":"23","author":"Sweeting","year":"2004","journal-title":"Statistics in Medicine"}],"container-title":["Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full\/10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,11]],"date-time":"2022-04-11T12:18:07Z","timestamp":1649679487000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/14651858.CD006003.pub2"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"name":"Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,4,18]]},"references-count":71,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.cd006003.pub2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1465-1858"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1465-1858","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,4,18]]}}}