{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T03:11:35Z","timestamp":1780456295379,"version":"3.54.1"},"update-to":[{"DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.cd007109","type":"new_version","label":"New version","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,20]],"date-time":"2014-02-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1392854400000}}],"reference-count":123,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":["wiley.com","cochranelibrary.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.cd007109.pub2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,20]],"date-time":"2014-02-20T22:16:07Z","timestamp":1392934567000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["Fewer-than-four ports versus four ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"2014","author":[{"given":"Kurinchi Selvan","family":"Gurusamy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School; Department of Surgery; Royal Free Hospital Rowland Hill Street London UK NW3 2PF"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jessica","family":"Vaughan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School; Department of Surgery; Royal Free Hospital Rowland Hill Street London UK NW3 2PF"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michele","family":"Rossi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi; Endoscopia Chirurgica; Largo Brambilla, 3 Firenze Firenze Italy 50121"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Brian R","family":"Davidson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School; Department of Surgery; Royal Free Hospital Rowland Hill Street London UK NW3 2PF"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,20]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0001|cit1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1896","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2625-5","article-title":"Quality-of-life measures after single-access versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study","volume":"27","author":"Abd Ellatif","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0002|cit2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1695","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7689","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"98","author":"Bucher","year":"2011","journal-title":"British Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"73","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0003|cit3","first-page":"15","article-title":"Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"54","author":"Cerci","year":"2007","journal-title":"Hepato-Gastroenterology"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0004|cit4","first-page":"641","article-title":"A randomised prospective comparative study between laparoscopic cholecystectomy and single port cholecystectomy in a major outpatient surgery unit","volume":"90","author":"Herrero","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cirugia Espanola"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0005|cit5","first-page":"358","article-title":"Three-port versus standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled clinical trial in a community-based teaching hospital in eastern Nepal","volume":"11","author":"Kumar","year":"2007","journal-title":"Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0006|cit6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2010.06.019","article-title":"Laparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a pilot randomized trial","volume":"202","author":"Lirici","year":"2011","journal-title":"American Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0007|cit7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1254","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2589-5","article-title":"A prospective, randomized comparison of pain, inflammatory response, and short-term outcomes between single port and laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"27","author":"Luna","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0008|cit8","first-page":"S14","article-title":"Single port-versus mini-versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a blinded randomized controlled trial","volume":"27","author":"Saad","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0009|cit9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9003","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of single-port, minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"100","author":"Saad","year":"2013","journal-title":"British Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0010|cit10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e3182402448","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study","volume":"22","author":"Sinan","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0011|cit11","unstructured":"Allemann P Safety and cost-effectiveness study of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomies (SPoCOT), 2012 clinicaltrials.gov\/show\/NCT00974194"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0012|cit12","unstructured":"Asakuma M Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the superiority of the Single Port Cholecystectomy (SPC) on reduction of postoperative pain, compared with the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the single institution, 2011 www.umin.ac.jp\/ctr\/index.htm"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0013|cit13","unstructured":"Bansal VK A prospective randomized control trial comparing the outcome of the two modalities of treatment of gall stone disease viz. single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with standard 4 port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 2012 www.ctri.nic.in\/Clinicaltrials\/pmaindet2.php?trialid=5253"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0014|cit14","unstructured":"Barugola G Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: impact on postoperative pain, 2011 clinicaltrials.gov\/show\/NCT01348620"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0015|cit15","unstructured":"Bingener-Casey J Comparative effectiveness of novel minimally invasive procedures, 2012 clinicaltrials.gov\/show\/NCT01489436"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0016|cit16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1080\/110241599750007478","article-title":"Elective transumbilical compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"165","author":"Bresadola","year":"1999","journal-title":"European Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0017|cit17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1012","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7126","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"97","author":"Broeders","year":"2010","journal-title":"British Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0018|cit18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3108","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-013-2914-7","article-title":"Patient-reported outcomes after single-incision versus traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective trial","volume":"27","author":"Brown","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0019|cit19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e31822cfacd","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term operative outcomes","volume":"21","author":"Cao","year":"2011","journal-title":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0020|cit20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1758-5910.2012.00154.x","article-title":"Interim report: A randomized controlled trial comparing postoperative pain in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"6","author":"Chang","year":"2013","journal-title":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0021|cit21","unstructured":"Chen TW Hsieh CB Huang SH Yu JC Liu YC Monduzzi Editore MEME Learning curves of an inexperienced surgeon for three-port microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy XXXIII World Congress of the International College of Surgeons - ICS 2002 2002 99 103"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0022|cit22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9043","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of single-port, minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"100","author":"Cockbain","year":"2013","journal-title":"British Journal of Surgery"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0023|cit23","unstructured":"Dam DAV Single Incision, MiniPort or convEntional Laparoscopic surgery for uncomplicated sympthomatic cholecystolithiasis (SIMPEL-trial), 2011 www.trialregister.nl\/trialreg\/admin\/rctview.asp?TC=3100"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0024|cit24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2012.0349","article-title":"Mini-laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"23","author":"Carvalho","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0025|cit25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e31824e53db","article-title":"A prospective controlled trial comparing single-incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: caution before damage control","volume":"22","author":"Garg","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0026|cit26","first-page":"149","article-title":"Minilaparoscopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"26","author":"Gupta","year":"2005","journal-title":"Tropical Gastroenterology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0027|cit27","unstructured":"Hansen P A randomized trial of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 2011 clinicaltrials.gov\/show\/NCT00892879"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0028|cit28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1689","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2657-x","article-title":"Comparison between single-incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective trial of the Club Coelio","volume":"27","author":"Hauters","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0029|cit29","first-page":"552","article-title":"Clinical application and study on three-port-looping laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"11","author":"Hu","year":"2005","journal-title":"China Journal of Endoscopy"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0030|cit30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1080","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-009-0730-x","article-title":"Optimized transumbilical endoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized comparison of two procedures","volume":"24","author":"Hu","year":"2010","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0031|cit31","unstructured":"Jorgensen LN Efficacy of transumbilical versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy on postoperative pain, 2010 clinicaltrials.gov\/show\/NCT01268748"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0032|cit32","unstructured":"Khorgami Z Comparison of perioperative outcomes following four port, three port and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients of Shariati hospital in 2011 www.irct.ir\/searchresult.php?id=2982&number=4"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0033|cit33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"749","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2009.0159","article-title":"Should subcostal and lateral trocars be used in laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A randomized, prospective study","volume":"19","author":"Kim","year":"2009","journal-title":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0034|cit34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2010.12.009","article-title":"Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"202","author":"Lai","year":"2011","journal-title":"American Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0035|cit35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7087","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"97","author":"Lee","year":"2010","journal-title":"British Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"1 Suppl","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0036|cit36","first-page":"S239","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy results in similar short-term post-operative pain and quality of life scores when compared to multi-incision: A prospective randomized blinded comparison","volume":"25","author":"Leung","year":"2011","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0037|cit37","first-page":"35","article-title":"[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary results of a comparison of 2 and 3 trocar operation techniques]","volume":"64","author":"Limberger","year":"2005","journal-title":"Chirurgische Praxis"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0038|cit38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3182192f89","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"254","author":"Ma","year":"2011","journal-title":"Annals of Surgery"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0039|cit39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Madureira FA Manso JE Madureira Filho D Iglesias AC Inflammation in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surgical Innovation 2013","DOI":"10.1177\/1553350613499454"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0040|cit40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1009","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2556-1","article-title":"Randomized clinical study for assessment of incision characteristics and pain associated with LESS versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"27","author":"Madureira","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0041|cit41","first-page":"S444","article-title":"Inflammation in less versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"27","author":"Madureira","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0042|cit42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2010.09.012","article-title":"Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data","volume":"201","author":"Marks","year":"2011","journal-title":"American Journal of Surgery"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0043|cit43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marks J Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus\u00a0SILS\u2122 port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 2012 clinicaltrials.gov\/show\/NCT00832767","DOI":"10.1186\/ISRCTN74919832"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0044|cit44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.024","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"216","author":"Marks","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0045|cit45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"614","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-011-1432-y","article-title":"Evaluating systemic stress response in single port vs. multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"15","author":"McGregor","year":"2011","journal-title":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery"},{"issue":"1 Suppl","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0046|cit46","first-page":"S34","article-title":"Single vs two vs three vs four incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial","volume":"25","author":"Moran","year":"2011","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0047|cit47","unstructured":"Mosca F Cuschieri A EndoCone single port versus conventional multi-port laparoscopic approach, 2012 clinicaltrials.gov\/show\/NCT01709877"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0048|cit48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1097\/00129689-199908000-00024","article-title":"Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a plea for scientific evidence","volume":"9","author":"Ng","year":"1999","journal-title":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0049|cit49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3435","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2359-4","article-title":"Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250)","volume":"26","author":"Noguera","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0050|cit50","first-page":"S74","article-title":"Length of the wound and postoperative scar after using single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"27","author":"Ospanov","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0051|cit51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2012.10.039","article-title":"Single incision versus standard 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial","volume":"48","author":"Ostlie","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0052|cit52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2013.0245","article-title":"Patient scar assessment after single-incision versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: long-term follow-up from a prospective randomized trial","volume":"23","author":"Ostlie","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0053|cit53","unstructured":"Pappas-Gogos\u00a0G Study of oxidative stress in standard laparoscopic vs single port cholecystectomy for uncomplicated cholelithiasis (LAP vs SILS), 2010 clinicaltrials.gov\/show\/NCT01211743"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0054|cit54","first-page":"13","article-title":"A comparative clinical evaluation of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with single and multiport access versus conventional mufti -port laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"50","author":"Pathania","year":"2013","journal-title":"European Surgical Research"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0055|cit55","unstructured":"Patricia YCL Prospective randomized trial of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus four ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with gallbladder stones, 2010 www.anzctr.org.au\/Trial\/Registration\/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12610000006044"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0056|cit56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1296","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-011-2028-z","article-title":"Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"26","author":"Phillips","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0057|cit57","first-page":"S217","article-title":"Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"25","author":"Phillips","year":"2011","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0058|cit58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1624","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-002-8718-9","article-title":"Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"17","author":"Poon","year":"2003","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0059|cit59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e3182631a9a","article-title":"Single-port versus multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial","volume":"22","author":"Sasaki","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0060|cit60","unstructured":"Soroush M The comparison between result of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with 4 ports cholecystectomy, 2011 www.irct.ir\/searchresult.php?id=6359&number=1"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0061|cit61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2482-11-24","article-title":"Cosmesis and body image after single-port laparoscopic or conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double blinded randomised controlled trial (SPOCC-trial)","volume":"11","author":"Steinemann","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMC Surgery"},{"issue":"1 Suppl","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0062|cit62","first-page":"S35","article-title":"Conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus SILS port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The first prospective randomized sham controlled trial","volume":"25","author":"Tacchino","year":"2011","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0063|cit63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1434","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-002-8713-1","article-title":"Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy - a prospective randomized study","volume":"17","author":"Trichak","year":"2003","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0064|cit64","unstructured":"Tsimogiannis K Study of the inflammatory reaction in standard vs single port cholecystectomy for uncomplicated cholelithiasis, 2010 clinicaltrials.gov\/show\/NCT01116492"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0065|cit65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1842","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-010-0887-3","article-title":"Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"24","author":"Tsimoyiannis","year":"2010","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"issue":"Suppl S1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0066|cit66","first-page":"S457","article-title":"Comparison of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with standard laparoscopic approach","volume":"27","author":"Umit Ugurlu","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0067|cit67","unstructured":"Vezakis A Polymeneas G A randomised comparison between single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 2010 clinicaltrials.gov\/show\/NCT01094379"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0068|cit68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-9941.97586","article-title":"Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised comparison of clinical results of 140 cases","volume":"8","author":"Vilallonga","year":"2012","journal-title":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0069|cit69","unstructured":"Mosca F EndoCone single port versus conventional multi-port laparoscopic approach, 2013 clinicaltrials.gov\/show\/NCT01709877"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0070|cit70","unstructured":"Soroush M The comparison between result of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with 4 ports cholecystectomy, 2013 www.irct.ir\/searchresult.php?id=6359&number=1"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0071|cit71","unstructured":"Takada Y Randomized study comparing quality of life after single-port versus conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 2013 www.umin.ac.jp\/ctr\/index.htm"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0072|cit72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1437","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-002-6351-3","article-title":"Is minisite cholecystectomy less traumatic? Prospective randomized study comparing minisite and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomies","volume":"26","author":"Alponat","year":"2002","journal-title":"World Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"18","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0073|cit73","first-page":"2376","article-title":"Cholecystectomy in Norway 1990-2002","volume":"124","author":"Bakken","year":"2004","journal-title":"Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0074|cit74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"458","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-001-9026-5","article-title":"Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial","volume":"16","author":"Bisgaard","year":"2002","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0075|cit75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2007.10.007","article-title":"Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses","volume":"61","author":"Brok","year":"2008","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0076|cit76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/dyn188","article-title":"Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive - trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses","volume":"38","author":"Brok","year":"2009","journal-title":"International Journal of Epidemiology"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0077|cit77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583","article-title":"SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials","volume":"158","author":"Chan","year":"2013","journal-title":"Annals of Internal Medicine"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0078|cit78","unstructured":"Copenhagen Trial Unit TSA - Trial Sequential Analysis ctu.dk\/tsa\/"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0079|cit79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"472","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.5984","article-title":"Management of acute gallbladder disease in England","volume":"95","author":"David","year":"2008","journal-title":"British Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0080|cit80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4780060325","article-title":"Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: strengths and limitations","volume":"6","author":"DeMets","year":"1987","journal-title":"Statistics in Medicine"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0081|cit81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(86)90046-2","article-title":"Meta-analysis in clinical trials","volume":"7","author":"DerSimonian","year":"1986","journal-title":"Controlled Clinical Trials"},{"issue":"7109","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0082|cit82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629","article-title":"Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test","volume":"315","author":"Egger","year":"1997","journal-title":"BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0083|cit83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1121","DOI":"10.1136\/gut.35.8.1121","article-title":"Prospective audit of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the west of Scotland. West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group","volume":"35","author":"Fullarton","year":"1994","journal-title":"Gut"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0084|cit84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1618","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-012-1906-6","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"16","author":"Garg","year":"2012","journal-title":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0085|cit85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7335","article-title":"Bile duct injury and use of cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"98","author":"Giger","year":"2011","journal-title":"British Journal of Surgery"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0086|cit86","unstructured":"Gluud C Nikolova D Klingenberg SL Alexakis N Als-Nielsen B Colli A Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group. About The Cochrane Collaboration (Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs)) 2013, Issue 5. Art. No.: LIVER"},{"issue":"7193","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0087|cit87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1038\/nature07039","article-title":"Wound repair and regeneration","volume":"453","author":"Gurtner","year":"2008","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0088|cit88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.6558","article-title":"Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery","volume":"96","author":"Gurusamy","year":"2009","journal-title":"British Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0089|cit89","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006804.pub3","article-title":"Miniports versus standard ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy","author":"Gurusamy","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0090|cit90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.2012.814","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review","volume":"147","author":"Hall","year":"2012","journal-title":"Archives of Surgery"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0091|cit91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"734","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.4547","article-title":"Development of symptoms and complications in individuals with asymptomatic gallstones","volume":"91","author":"Halldestam","year":"2004","journal-title":"British Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0092|cit92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1539","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1186","article-title":"Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis","volume":"21","author":"Higgins","year":"2002","journal-title":"Statistics in Medicine"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0093|cit93","unstructured":"Higgins JPT Green S (editors) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011 Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0094|cit94","volume-title":"International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. ICH harmonised tripartite guideline. Guideline for good clinical practice CFR & ICH Guidelines","volume":"1","author":"International Conference on Harmonisation Expert Working Group","year":"1997"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0095|cit95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"912","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.aje.a114728","article-title":"Prevalence of gallstones in a Danish population","volume":"126","author":"J\u00f8rgensen","year":"1987","journal-title":"American Journal of Epidemiology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0096|cit96","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006231","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis","author":"Keus","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0097|cit97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"982","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-135-11-200112040-00010","article-title":"Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses","volume":"135","author":"Kjaergard","year":"2001","journal-title":"Annals of Internal Medicine"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0098|cit98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2004.06.013","article-title":"A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy","volume":"188","author":"Livingston","year":"2004","journal-title":"American Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0099|cit99","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.MR000033.pub2","article-title":"Industry sponsorship and research outcome","author":"Lundh","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0100|cit100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.698","article-title":"A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis","volume":"20","author":"Macaskill","year":"2001","journal-title":"Statistics in Medicine"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0101|cit101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1205","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-011-2051-0","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"26","author":"Markar","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0102|cit102","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1386","DOI":"10.1007\/s004649900864","article-title":"Cholecystectomy rates, gallstone prevalence, and handling of bile duct injuries in Scandinavia. A comparative audit","volume":"12","author":"Mj\u00e4land","year":"1998","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"issue":"9128","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0103|cit103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(98)01085-X","article-title":"Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?","volume":"352","author":"Moher","year":"1998","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0104|cit104","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004","article-title":"CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials","volume":"63","author":"Moher","year":"2010","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0105|cit105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1125","DOI":"10.3109\/00365529509101618","article-title":"Prevalence of gallstone disease in a Swedish population","volume":"30","author":"Muhrbeck","year":"1995","journal-title":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0106|cit106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/21.5.837","article-title":"Intention-to-treat analysis: implications for quantitative and qualitative research","volume":"21","author":"Newell","year":"1992","journal-title":"International Journal of Epidemiology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0107|cit107","unstructured":"NIH NIH consensus statement on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 1992 consensus.nih.gov\/1992\/1992GallstonesLaparoscopy090html.htm"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0108|cit108","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1790","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-012-1956-9","article-title":"Meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC)","volume":"16","author":"Pisanu","year":"2012","journal-title":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0109|cit109","unstructured":"The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager (RevMan) 2012"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0110|cit110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"506","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-009-1116-z","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a surgeon's initial experience with 56 consecutive cases and a review of the literature","volume":"14","author":"Roberts","year":"2010","journal-title":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0111|cit111","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266462303000552","article-title":"Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches","volume":"19","author":"Royle","year":"2003","journal-title":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care"},{"issue":"35","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0112|cit112","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hta16350","article-title":"Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials","volume":"16","author":"Savovic","year":"2012","journal-title":"Health Technology Assessment"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0113|cit113","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00537","article-title":"Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials","volume":"157","author":"Savovic","year":"2012","journal-title":"Annals of Internal Medicine"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0114|cit114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"408","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1995.03520290060030","article-title":"Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials","volume":"273","author":"Schulz","year":"1995","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0115|cit115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e190","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e318257000c","article-title":"Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of available data","volume":"22","author":"Song","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0116|cit116","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1904","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-009-0108-1","article-title":"Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials","volume":"33","author":"Sun","year":"2009","journal-title":"World Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0117|cit117","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/dyn179","article-title":"Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses","volume":"38","author":"Thorlund","year":"2009","journal-title":"International Journal of Epidemiology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0118|cit118","first-page":"57","article-title":"Interpreting meta-analysis according to the adequacy of sample size. An example using isoniazid chemoprophylaxis for tuberculosis in purified protein derivative negative HIV-infected individuals","volume":"2","author":"Thorlund","year":"2010","journal-title":"Clinical Epidemiology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0119|cit119","unstructured":"Thorlund K Engstr\u00f8m J Wetterslev J Brok J Imberger G Gluud C User manual for Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) ctu.dk\/tsa\/files\/tsa_manual.pdf"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0120|cit120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1445-2197.2012.06044.x","article-title":"Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials","volume":"82","author":"Wang","year":"2012","journal-title":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0121|cit121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2007.03.013","article-title":"Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis","volume":"61","author":"Wetterslev","year":"2008","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0122|cit122","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-9-86","article-title":"Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses","volume":"9","author":"Wetterslev","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMC Medical Research Methodology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2-BIB0123|cit123","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39465.451748.AD","article-title":"Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study","volume":"336","author":"Wood","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)"}],"container-title":["Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full\/10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,8]],"date-time":"2024-01-08T16:18:03Z","timestamp":1704730683000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/14651858.CD007109.pub2"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"name":"Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,20]]},"references-count":123,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,2]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.cd007109.pub2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1465-1858"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1465-1858","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,20]]}}}