{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,22]],"date-time":"2026-09-22T14:19:02Z","timestamp":1790086742264,"version":"4.0.1"},"update-to":[{"DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.cd007372.pub3","type":"new_version","label":"New version","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,27]],"date-time":"2020-08-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1598486400000}}],"reference-count":81,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"8","content-domain":{"domain":["wiley.com","cochranelibrary.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.cd007372.pub4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,27]],"date-time":"2020-08-27T15:52:43Z","timestamp":1598543563000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"2020","author":[{"given":"Zarko","family":"Alfirevic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Women's and Children's Health; The University of Liverpool; Liverpool UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gillian ML","family":"Gyte","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health; University of Liverpool; Liverpool UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vicky","family":"Nogueira Pileggi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pediatrics, Ribeir\u00e3o Preto Medical School; University of S\u00e3o Paulo; S\u00e3o Paulo Brazil"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rachel","family":"Plachcinski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"C\/o Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health; University of Liverpool; Liverpool UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alfred O","family":"Osoti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; University of Nairobi; Nairobi Kenya"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elaine M","family":"Finucane","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University Maternity Hospital Limerick; Limerick Ireland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,27]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0001|cit1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)31079-9","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial of outpatient versus inpatient labour induction with vaginal controlled-release prostaglandin-E2: effectiveness and satisfaction","volume":"25","author":"Biem","year":"2003","journal-title":"Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Canada: JOGC"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0002|cit2","first-page":"22","article-title":"A comparison between in-patient and out-patient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a prospective randomised controlled trial in PPUKM","volume":"73","author":"Mohamad","year":"2018","journal-title":"Medical Journal of Malaysia"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0003|cit3","unstructured":"Policiano C Outpatient versus inpatient cervix priming with Foley catheter https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT02842879"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0004|cit4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.11.026","article-title":"Outpatient versus inpatient cervix priming with Foley catheter: a randomized trial","volume":"210","author":"Policiano","year":"2017","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"},{"issue":"1 Pt 2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0005|cit5","first-page":"S92","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial of inpatient vs. outpatient administration of prostaglandin E2, gel for induction of labour at term [SPO Abstract 303]","volume":"178","author":"Ryan","year":"1998","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"1 Pt 2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0006|cit6","first-page":"S136","article-title":"Patient acceptance of outpatient pre-induction cervical ripening with the foley bulb","volume":"182","author":"Pollock","year":"2000","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0007|cit7","first-page":"751","article-title":"Transcervical foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting","volume":"98","author":"Sciscione","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0008|cit8","first-page":"62","article-title":"Pilot trial of balloon catheter cervical priming: Women and clinician views of inpatient and outpatient applications","volume":"50","author":"Adelson","year":"2014","journal-title":"Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0009|cit9","unstructured":"Turnbull D A pilot randomised controlled trial of outpatient balloon catheter priming for induction of labour https:\/\/www.anzctr.org.au\/Trial\/Registration\/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12612001184864"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0010|cit10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0550-z","article-title":"A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial","volume":"15","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0011|cit11","first-page":"37, Abstract no","article-title":"A pilot randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared to inpatient cervical priming using double balloon catheters-clinical results of the copra study","volume":"50","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2014","journal-title":"Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health"},{"issue":"Suppl S1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0012|cit12","first-page":"231","article-title":"Outpatient compared to inpatient cervical ripening with a double balloon catheter. A pilot randomised controlled trial","volume":"122","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0013|cit13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1071\/AH13081","article-title":"A cost analysis of inpatient compared with outpatient prostaglandin E2 cervical priming for induction of labour: results from the OPRA trial","volume":"37","author":"Adelson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Australian Health Review"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0014|cit14","first-page":"27","article-title":"A cost analysis of outpatient priming for induction of labour induction: Results from the outpatient priming for induction of labour trial (OPRA)","volume":"49 Suppl 2","author":"Adelson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0015|cit15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1016\/j.healthplace.2010.12.001","article-title":"Inpatient versus outpatient cervical priming for induction of labour: Therapeutic landscapes and women\u2019s preferences","volume":"17","author":"Oster","year":"2011","journal-title":"Health and Place"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0016|cit16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12035","article-title":"Psychosocial outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of outpatient cervical priming for induction of labor","volume":"40","author":"Turnbull","year":"2013","journal-title":"Birth"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0017|cit17","first-page":"61","article-title":"A two-centre randomised controlled trial of outpatient cervical priming for induction of labour: Psychosocial outcomes","volume":"48","author":"Turnbull","year":"2012","journal-title":"Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0018|cit18","first-page":"100","article-title":"A two-center randomised controlled trial of outpatient cervical priming for induction of labour: A qualitative examination confirming psychosocial benefit","volume":"49 Suppl 2","author":"Turnbull","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0019|cit19","unstructured":"Turnbull D A multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing outpatient and inpatient cervical priming with intravaginal prostaglandins for induction of labour https:\/\/www.anzctr.org.au\/Trial\/Registration\/TrialReview.aspx?id=82815"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0020|cit20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S137","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.10.301","article-title":"Two center RCT of outpatient versus inpatient cervical ripening for induction of labour with PGE2","volume":"206","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2012","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0021|cit21","first-page":"16","article-title":"Clinical results of a randomized controlled trial of outpatient cervical priming for induction of labor with prostaglandin E2","volume":"49 Suppl 2","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0022|cit22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12846","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E (OPRA study)","volume":"122","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0023|cit23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12348","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of term induction of labour using inpatient prostaglandin gel versus outpatient Foley catheter","volume":"55","author":"Austin","year":"2015","journal-title":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0024|cit24","unstructured":"Beckmann M Prostaglandin Inpatient iNduction of labour Compared with BALLOon Outpatient iNduction of labour: a randomised controlled trial https:\/\/www.anzctr.org.au\/Trial\/Registration\/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12614000039684"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0025|cit25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.03.031","article-title":"Women's experience of induction of labor using PGE2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient","volume":"249","author":"Beckmann","year":"2020","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0026|cit26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16030","article-title":"Induction of labour using prostaglandin E2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient: a multicentre randomised controlled trial","volume":"127","author":"Beckmann","year":"2020","journal-title":"BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0027|cit27","unstructured":"Henry A An evaluation of Outpatient Foley (intracervical) catheter versus Inpatient Prostaglandin Vaginal Gel (PGE2) on the induction of labour at term https:\/\/anzctr.org.au\/Trial\/Registration\/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12609000420246"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0028|cit28","first-page":"473","article-title":"Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient Prostin gel for cervical ripening: the FOG (Foley or Gel) trial","volume":"51","author":"Henry","year":"2011","journal-title":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0029|cit29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-25","article-title":"Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial","volume":"13","author":"Henry","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0030|cit30","first-page":"474","article-title":"Satisfaction survey: outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient Prostin gel for cervical ripening","volume":"51","author":"Henry","year":"2011","journal-title":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0031|cit31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002678","article-title":"Outpatient Foley catheter for induction of labor in parous women a randomized controlled trial","volume":"132","author":"Kuper","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0032|cit32","unstructured":"Kuper SG Outpatient Foley for starting induction of labor at term https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT02756689"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0033|cit33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S437","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.682","article-title":"660: Outpatient versus inpatient cervical ripening in obese parous women","volume":"220","author":"Subramaniam","year":"2019","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0034|cit34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4173-z","article-title":"Randomized double-blind placebo controlled study of preinduction cervical priming with 25 microg of misoprostol in the outpatient setting to prevent formal induction of labour","volume":"295","author":"PonMalar","year":"2017","journal-title":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0035|cit35","unstructured":"Rijnders ME Costs and effects of amniotomy at home for induction of post term pregnancy http:\/\/www.isrctn.com\/ISRCTN47736435"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0036|cit36","volume-title":"Interventions in Midwife Led Care in the Netherlands to Achieve Optimal Birth Outcomes: Effects and Women's Experiences","author":"Rijnders","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0037|cit37","unstructured":"Torbenson VE Outpatient Foley catheter compared to usual inpatient care for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT02546193"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0038|cit38","unstructured":"Wise M Comparison of low-risk pregnant women undergoing induction of labour at term by outpatient balloon or inpatient prostaglandin in order to assess caesarean section rate; a randomised controlled trial https:\/\/anzctr.org.au\/Trial\/Registration\/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12616000739415"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0039|cit39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-020-4061-5","article-title":"Outpatient balloon catheter vs inpatient prostaglandin for induction of labour (OBLIGE): a randomised controlled trial","volume":"21","author":"Wise","year":"2020","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0040|cit40","unstructured":"Denona B Comparison on patient satisfaction with Cervical Ripening Balloon using inpatient and outpatient protocol http:\/\/www.isrctn.com\/ISRCTN10109823"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0041|cit41","unstructured":"Hedriana H Outpatient cervical preparation to reduce induction duration in nulliparous term singleton vertex women: a randomized controlled trial https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT03934918"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0042|cit42","unstructured":"Mullin PM Outpatient labor induction with the transcervical Foley balloon: a randomized trial comparing outpatient immediate removal Foley versus standard inpatient Foley induction https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT02210598"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0043|cit43","unstructured":"Ausbeck EB Outpatient Foley for starting induction of labor at term in nulliparous women: a randomized-controlled study https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT03472937"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0044|cit44","unstructured":"Kohari K Inpatient versus outpatient Foley cervical ripening study https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT03725397"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0045|cit45","unstructured":"A prospective randomised controlled trial of outpatient versus inpatient labour induction with vaginal controlled-release prostaglandin-E2: effectiveness and satisfaction http:\/\/www.isrctn.com\/ISRCTN71488751"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0046|cit46","unstructured":"Nichols J A trial of Cervidil (dinoprostone, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), insert) for outpatient pre-induction of cervical ripening in women at 39.0-41.6 weeks gestation https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT03806231"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0047|cit47","unstructured":"Pierce-Williams R Inpatient versus outpatient transcervical Foley catheter use for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT03769610"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0048|cit48","unstructured":"Pin TY Induction of labour with a foley catheter in pregnant women with previous successful vaginal birth in outpatient vs inpatient settings http:\/\/www.isrctn.com\/ISRCTN13534944"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0049|cit49","unstructured":"Rinne KM Outpatient versus inpatient double balloon catheter for induction of labor: a randomised trial https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT02793609"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0050|cit50","unstructured":"Saad A Induction of labor in women with unfavorable cervix: randomized controlled trial comparing outpatient to inpatient cervical ripening using Dilapan-S\u00ae (HOMECARE) https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT03665688"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0051|cit51","unstructured":"Shrivastava V Patient satisfaction during outpatient versus inpatient Foley catheter induction of labor https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT02975167"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0052|cit52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Induction of Labor ACOG Practice Bulletin 2009 114 386 97","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0053|cit53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alfirevic Z Keeney E Dowswell T Welton N Medley N Dias S Which method is best for the induction of labour? A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis Health Technology Assessment 2016 20 65 1 584","DOI":"10.3310\/hta20650"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0054|cit54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.2.250","article-title":"Nitric oxide--another factor in cervical ripening","volume":"13","author":"Calder","year":"1998","journal-title":"Human Reproduction"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0055|cit55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2018.10.013","article-title":"Women\u2019s experiences of induction of labour: qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis","volume":"69","author":"Coates","year":"2019","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0056|cit56","first-page":"91","article-title":"Uterine hyperstimulation. The need for standard terminology","volume":"32","author":"Curtis","year":"1987","journal-title":"Journal of Reproductive Medicine"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0057|cit57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-020-03060-1","article-title":"Inpatient versus outpatient induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"20","author":"Dong","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0058|cit58","first-page":"1673-80","article-title":"Development of a core outcome set for trials on induction of labour: an international multistakeholder Delphi study","volume":"125","author":"Dos Santos","year":"2018","journal-title":"British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0059|cit59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000451.pub3","article-title":"Membrane sweeping for induction of labour","author":"Finucane","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0060|cit60","unstructured":"Gates S Methodological Guidelines In: The Editorial Team. Pregnancy and Childbirth Group. About The Cochrane Collaboration (Collaborative Review Groups (CRGs)) 2005, Issue 2"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0061|cit61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S601","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.016","article-title":"A randomized trial of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management of low-risk nulliparous women","volume":"218","author":"Rice","year":"2018","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0062|cit62","unstructured":"Higgins JP Green S Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011 Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0063|cit63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD002074.pub2","article-title":"Methods for cervical ripening and labour induction in late pregnancy: generic protocol","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0064|cit64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-019-2491-4","article-title":"Double versus single-balloon catheters for labour induction and cervical ripening: a meta-analysis","volume":"19","author":"Liu","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0065|cit65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/S0306-5456(00)00039-5","article-title":"In vivo controlled release of PGE2 from a vaginal insert (0.8 mm, 10 mg) during induction of labour","volume":"108","author":"Lyrenas","year":"2001","journal-title":"British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0066|cit66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004945.pub4","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","author":"Middleton","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0067|cit67","unstructured":"National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Inducting labour: Clinical Guideline National Collaborating Centre for Women\u2019s and Children\u2019s Health 2008 RCOG Press, London Available at https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/cg70\/chapter\/4 research-recommendations"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0068|cit68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1356-y","article-title":"Measuring women\u2019s childbirth experiences: a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments","volume":"17","author":"Nilv\u00e9r","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0069|cit69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e008755","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-008755","article-title":"Variation in hospital rates of induction of labour: a population-based record linkage study","volume":"5","author":"Nippita","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0070|cit70","unstructured":"The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager (RevMan) 2014"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0071|cit71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.10.014","article-title":"GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions","volume":"119","author":"Santesso","year":"2020","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0072|cit72","unstructured":"Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada Induction of Labour SOGC Clinical Practice Guideline Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada 2013 296 Available at: https:\/\/sogc.org\/wp content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/September2013-CPG296-ENG-Online_REV-D.pdf (accessed 4th April 2017)"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0073|cit73","first-page":"1145","article-title":"Effect of labour induction on rates of stillbirth and cesarean section in post-term pregnancies","volume":"160","author":"Sue-A-Quan","year":"1999","journal-title":"Canadian Medical Association Journal"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0074|cit74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003101.pub3","article-title":"Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term","author":"Thomas","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"9022","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0075|cit75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(95)11207-3","article-title":"Randomised, controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed care","volume":"348","author":"Turnbull","year":"1996","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0076|cit76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007701.pub3","article-title":"Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings","author":"Vogel","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0077|cit77","unstructured":"World Health Organization WHO Recommendations for Induction of Labour World Health Organization Guidelines 2011 http:\/\/apps.who.int\/iris\/bitstream\/10665\/44531\/1\/9789241501156_eng.pdf (accessed 4th April 2017)"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0078|cit78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01193.x","article-title":"Does sweeping of membranes beyond 40 weeks reduce the need for formal induction of labour?","volume":"109","author":"Wong","year":"2002","journal-title":"British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0079|cit79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372","article-title":"Outpatient versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes","author":"Kelly","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0080|cit80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub2","article-title":"Outpatient versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes","author":"Kelly","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4-BIB0081|cit81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub3","article-title":"Outpatient versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes","author":"Kelly","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"}],"container-title":["Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,20]],"date-time":"2022-07-20T09:33:43Z","timestamp":1658309623000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/14651858.CD007372.pub4"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"name":"Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,27]]},"references-count":81,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.cd007372.pub4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1465-1858"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1465-1858","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,27]]}}}