{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]],"date-time":"2026-06-02T21:17:16Z","timestamp":1780435036630,"version":"3.54.1"},"update-to":[{"DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.cd009792.pub2","type":"new_version","label":"New version","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,9]],"date-time":"2017-06-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1496966400000}}],"reference-count":68,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":["wiley.com","cochranelibrary.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.cd009792.pub3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,10]],"date-time":"2017-06-10T01:09:32Z","timestamp":1497056972000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"2017","author":[{"given":"Helen M","family":"West","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of Liverpool; Institute of Psychology, Health and Society; Liverpool UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marta","family":"Jozwiak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Leiden University Medical Center; Leiden Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jodie M","family":"Dodd","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of Adelaide, Women's and Children's Hospital; School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; 72 King William Road Adelaide South Australia Australia 5006"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0001|cit1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.4236\/ojog.2014.41007","article-title":"Comparative study for success rate of vaginal birth after cesarean section following labor induction by two forms of vaginal dinoprostone: a pilot study","volume":"4","author":"Hassan","year":"2014","journal-title":"Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0002|cit2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"797","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2015.1011101","article-title":"Prospective multi-centre randomised trial comparing induction of labour with a double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone","volume":"35","author":"Lokkegaard","year":"2015","journal-title":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0003|cit3","unstructured":"NCT01255839 A prospective multi-centre randomised comparison on induction of labour with double-balloon installation device versus prostaglandin e2 minprostin clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT01255839"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0004|cit4","unstructured":"CTRI\/2014\/02\/004412 Randomised trial comparing intrauterine balloon catheter with 30 ml fluid with intrauterine balloon catheter with 80 ml of fluid to start labor in women with one previous caesarean section ctri.nic.in\/Clinicaltrials\/pmaindet2.php?trialid=4199"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0005|cit5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1177\/0049475515626031","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial comparing 30 ml and 80 ml in Foley catheter for induction of labour after previous caesarean section","volume":"46","author":"Manish","year":"2016","journal-title":"Tropical Doctor"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0006|cit6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-4958.135223","article-title":"Induction of labor in patients with previous cesarean section with unfavorable cervix","volume":"28","author":"Meetei","year":"2015","journal-title":"JMS - Journal of Medical Society"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0007|cit7","first-page":"55","article-title":"Intracervical Foley catheter versus vaginal isosorbid mononitrate for induction of labor in women with previous one cesarean section","volume":"3","author":"Rezk","year":"2014","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0008|cit8","unstructured":"CTRI\/2012\/06\/002733 Induction of labor in women with previous one cesarean section: prospective double blind randomized control trial comparing the effect of mifepristone with sweeping stretching and trans-cervical Folley\u2019s catheterization ctri.nic.in\/Clinicaltrials\/pmaindet2.php?trialid=4745"},{"issue":"Suppl 5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0009|cit9","first-page":"E216","article-title":"Induction of labor in women with previous cesarean section; mifepristone versus trans-cervical catheter. A randomized controlled trial","volume":"131","author":"Sharma","year":"2015","journal-title":"International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics"},{"issue":"Suppl S1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0010|cit10","first-page":"303","article-title":"Induction of labour in women with previous one caesarean section; mifepristone versus transcervical Foley's catheter. A randomised controlled trial","volume":"122","author":"Sharma","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0011|cit11","unstructured":"Sellers SM Ah-Moye M MacKenzie IZ Comparison of vaginal prostaglandin E2 and intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour in women previously delivered by caesarean section 1st European Congress on Prostaglandins in Reproduction; 1988 July 6-9; Vienna, Austria 1988 128"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0012|cit12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.3109\/01443619309151705","article-title":"A prospective random allocation trial to compare vaginal prostaglandin E2 with intravenous oxytocin for labour induction in women previously delivered by caesarean section","volume":"13","author":"Taylor","year":"1993","journal-title":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"issue":"5 Pt 2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0013|cit13","first-page":"828","article-title":"Disruption of prior uterine incision following misoprostol for labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery","volume":"91","author":"Wing","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0014|cit14","first-page":"95-100; discuss","article-title":"Delivery conduction in patients with cicatrix of a prior Cesarean section. Pilot study","volume":"59","author":"Arraztoa","year":"1994","journal-title":"Revista Chilena de Obstetricia y Ginecologia"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0015|cit15","first-page":"S117","article-title":"Ripening of the uterine cervix in post cesarean parturient: PGE2 vs intracervical Foley catheter","volume":"184","author":"Ben-Aroya","year":"2001","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0016|cit16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b8fa00","article-title":"Serial membrane sweeping at term in planned vaginal birth after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"114","author":"Hamdan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0017|cit17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13150.x","article-title":"Mifepristone for labour induction after previous caesarean section","volume":"101","author":"Lelaidier","year":"1994","journal-title":"British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0018|cit18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"955","DOI":"10.1097\/00007611-198608000-00010","article-title":"Expectant management of rupture of membranes at term","volume":"79","author":"Morales","year":"1986","journal-title":"Southern Medical Journal"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0019|cit19","first-page":"QC01","article-title":"Membrane sweeping for vaginal birth after caesarean section and its outcome -a comparative study","volume":"9","author":"Ramya","year":"2015","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research"},{"issue":"1 Pt 2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0020|cit20","first-page":"354","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section: comparison of outpatient use of prostaglandin gel to expectant management","volume":"174","author":"Gittens","year":"1996","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0021|cit21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1016\/S1068-607X(98)00096-1","article-title":"Attempted vaginal birth after cesarean section: a multicenter comparison of outpatient prostaglandin E2 gel with expectant management","volume":"5","author":"Rayburn","year":"1998","journal-title":"Primary Care Update for Ob\/Gyns"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0022|cit22","first-page":"250","article-title":"Weekly administration of prostaglandin e2 gel compared with expectant management in women with previous cesareans Prepidil gel study group","volume":"94","author":"Rayburn","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"1 Pt 2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0023|cit23","first-page":"S76","article-title":"A randomized prospective comparison of the intracervical Foley bulb to intravaginal misoprostol (cytotec) for preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"180","author":"Manley","year":"1999","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0024|cit24","first-page":"603","article-title":"A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"97","author":"Sciscione","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0025|cit25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.10.028","article-title":"Use of hyaluronidase for cervical ripening: a randomized trial","volume":"130","author":"Spallicci","year":"2007","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0026|cit26","first-page":"67","article-title":"Randomized double blind study of ripening the cervix with hyaluronidase in term gestations","volume":"25","author":"Spallicci","year":"2003","journal-title":"Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0027|cit27","unstructured":"NCT02196103 Management of labor in patients with previous cesarian section and premature rupture of membranes who desire TOLAC: comparison between the use of standard expectant management and the double-balloon catheter device. A prospective randomized study clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT02196103"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0028|cit28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200608000-00045","article-title":"Committee Opinion No 342: induction of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"108","author":"ACOG","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0029|cit29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001338.pub2","article-title":"Oral misoprostol for induction of labour","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"7222","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0030|cit30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1397","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.319.7222.1397","article-title":"Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study","volume":"319","author":"Belizan","year":"1999","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"5 Pt 2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0031|cit31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"832","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00036-7","article-title":"Uterine rupture during induction of labor at term with intravaginal misoprostol","volume":"89","author":"Bennett","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0032|cit32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)31033-7","article-title":"The management of VBAC at term: a survey of Canadian obstetricians","volume":"25","author":"Brill","year":"2003","journal-title":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada: JOGC"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0033|cit33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000109148.23082.C1","article-title":"Cervical ripening with transcervical Foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture","volume":"103","author":"Bujold","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0034|cit34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1115","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.115177","article-title":"Misoprostol induction of labor among women with a history of cesarean delivery","volume":"184","author":"Choy-Hee","year":"2001","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0035|cit35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"408","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00675-6","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 147,075 patients who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a review of the literature","volume":"189","author":"Chuahan","year":"2003","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0036|cit36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.1999.780716.x","article-title":"Induction of labor by vaginal misoprostol in patients with previous cesarean delivery","volume":"78","author":"Cunha","year":"1999","journal-title":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0037|cit37","unstructured":"Deeks JJ Higgins JPT Altman DG (editors) Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011 Available from handbook.cochrane.org"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0038|cit38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0004-8666.2003.00073.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a survey of practice in Australia and New Zealand","volume":"43","author":"Dodd","year":"2003","journal-title":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0039|cit39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004224.pub2","article-title":"Planned elective caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth","author":"Dodd","year":"2004","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0040|cit40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004906.pub3","article-title":"Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth","author":"Dodd","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0041|cit41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2010.542516","article-title":"Induction of labour in women with one previous caesarean section","volume":"21","author":"Gupta","year":"2011","journal-title":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0042|cit42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0043|cit43","unstructured":"Higgins JPT Altman DG Sterne JAC (editors) Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011 Available from handbook.cochrane.org"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0044|cit44","unstructured":"Higgins JPT Deeks JJ Altman DG (editors) Chapter 16: Special topics in statistics. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011 Available from handbook.cochrane.org"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0045|cit45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD002074.pub2","article-title":"Methods for cervical ripening and labour induction in late pregnancy: generic protocol","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0046|cit46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000941.pub2","article-title":"Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0047|cit47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00336.x","article-title":"Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section","volume":"112","author":"Kayani","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology"},{"issue":"25","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0048|cit48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"351","author":"Landon","year":"2004","journal-title":"New England Journal of Medicine"},{"issue":"3 Pt 2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0049|cit49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.066","article-title":"The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery","volume":"193","author":"Landon","year":"2005","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0050|cit50","volume-title":"Australia's Mothers and Babies 2007. Cat. no. PER 48","author":"Laws","year":"2009"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0051|cit51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1394","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00287.x","article-title":"Risks of induction of labour in women with a uterine scar from previous low transverse caesarean section","volume":"111","author":"Locatelli","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0052|cit52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery","volume":"345","author":"Lydon-Rochelle","year":"2001","journal-title":"New England Journal of Medicine"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0053|cit53","unstructured":"Martin JA Sutton PD Ventura SJ Menacker F Kirmeyer S Mathews TJ National Vital Statistics Reports. Births: Final Data for 2006 www.cdc.gov\/nchs\/data\/nvsr\/nvsr57\/nvsr57_07.pdf (accessed July 2011)"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0054|cit54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004221.pub2","article-title":"Buccal or sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour","author":"Muzonzini","year":"2004","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0055|cit55","volume-title":"NHS Maternity Statistics 2008-09","author":"NHS","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0056|cit56","unstructured":"National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Panel Obstetrics and Gynecology 2010"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0057|cit57","unstructured":"Euro-PERISTAT Project The European Perinatal Health Report www.europeristat.com 2008"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0058|cit58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1016\/0301-2115(95)02365-8","article-title":"Uterine rupture during second trimester termination of pregnancy using mifepristone and a prostaglandin","volume":"65","author":"Phillips","year":"1996","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology"},{"issue":"6 Pt 1","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0059|cit59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1535","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70049-9","article-title":"Uterine rupture associated with the use of misoprostol in the gravid patient with a previous cesarean section","volume":"180","author":"Plaut","year":"1999","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0060|cit60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1176","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.109037","article-title":"Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery","volume":"183","author":"Ravasia","year":"2000","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0061|cit61","volume-title":"Induction of Labour. Clinical Guideline no 70","author":"National Collaborating Centre for Women\u2019s and Children\u2019s Health","year":"2008"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0062|cit62","unstructured":"Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5) 2014"},{"issue":"7462","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0063|cit63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38160.634352.55","article-title":"Factors predisposing to perinatal death related to uterine rupture during attempted vaginal birth after caesarean section: retrospective cohort study","volume":"329","author":"Smith","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0064|cit64","first-page":"319","article-title":"SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155 (Replaces guideline Number 147), February 2005","volume":"89","author":"Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada","year":"2005","journal-title":"International Journal of Gynaecology & Obstetrics"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0065|cit65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70267-3","article-title":"A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction","volume":"175","author":"Wing","year":"1996","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0066|cit66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"842","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01713.x","article-title":"Severe maternal morbidity during pregnancy, delivery and puerperium in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based study of 371 000 pregnancies","volume":"115","author":"Zwart","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0067|cit67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub2","article-title":"Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3-BIB0068|cit68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792","article-title":"Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"}],"container-title":["Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full\/10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,15]],"date-time":"2024-03-15T02:02:52Z","timestamp":1710468172000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"name":"Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,9]]},"references-count":68,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.cd009792.pub3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1465-1858"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1465-1858","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,9]]}}}