{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T15:47:10Z","timestamp":1782834430843,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,9,22]],"date-time":"2005-09-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1127347200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":630,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Proc of Assoc for Info"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2004,1]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>This paper reports on an exploratory study of how university students perceive and interact with Web search engines compared to Web\u2010based OPACs. A qualitative study was conducted involving sixteen students, eight of whom were first\u2010year undergraduates and eight of whom were graduate students in Library and Information Science. The participants performed searches on Google and on a university OPAC. The interviews and think\u2010afters revealed that while students were aware of the problems inherent in Web searching and of the many ways in which OPACS are more organized, they generally preferred Web searching. The coding of the data suggests that the reason for this preference lies in psychological factors associated with the comparative ease with which search engines can be used, and system and interface factors which made searching the Web much easier and less confusing. As a result of these factors, students were able to approach even the drawbacks of the Web\u2014its clutter of irrelevant pages and the dubious authority of the results\u2014in an enthusiastic and proactive manner, very different from the passive and ineffectual admiration they expressed for the OPAC. The findings suggest that requirements of good OPAC interface design must be aggressively redefined in the face of new, Web\u2010based standards of usability.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/meet.1450410116","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,9,22]],"date-time":"2005-09-22T14:35:29Z","timestamp":1127399729000},"page":"138-146","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":60,"title":["\u201cI still like Google\u201d: University student perceptions of searching OPACs and the web"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"Karl V.","family":"Fast","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"D. Grant","family":"Campbell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,9,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_9_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4571(199607)47:7<493::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-P"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0740-8188(00)00051-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4571(19980501)49:6<541::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_5_1","first-page":"403","volume-title":"Online catalogs from the users' perspective: The use of focus group interview","author":"Connaway L. S.","year":"1997"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:1<24::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-W"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_7_1","unstructured":"Google. (2000 July 13).Google's Success Story Continues: Google Ranked No. 1 in NPD Search & Portal Scorecard Measuring Loyalty and Satisfaction. Available: ."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0306-4573(99)00056-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_9_1","volume-title":"Don't make me think: A common sense approach to Web usability","author":"Krug S.","year":"2000"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0740-8188(97)90039-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_11_1","unstructured":"Nielsen J.(2000 July 23).End of Web design. In Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox Available: "},{"key":"e_1_2_9_12_1","unstructured":"Nielsen J.(2001 May 13).Search: Visible and simple. In Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox Available: ."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-08-052029-2.50007-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_14_1","unstructured":"Nielsen\/NetRatings. (2004 Feb. 23).One in three Americans use a search engine according to Nielsen\/Netratings. Available: ."},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_2_9_15_1","first-page":"68","article-title":"Web\u2010based OPACs: Between tradition and innovation","volume":"18","author":"Ortiz\u2010Repiso V.","year":"1999","journal-title":"Information technology and libraries"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_16_1","volume-title":"Web site usability handook","author":"Pearrow M.","year":"2000"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_17_1","volume-title":"Handbook of usability testing","author":"Rubin J.","year":"1994"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_18_1","volume-title":"Experience design 1","author":"Shedroff N.","year":"2001"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:8<757::AID-ASI80>3.0.CO;2-T"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1591>3.0.CO;2-R"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_21_1","unstructured":"Sullivan D.(2000 Jul. 6).NPD search and portal site study. In SearchEngineWatch.com Available: ."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_22_1","unstructured":"Sullivan D.(2003 Feb. 25).Searches per day. In SearchEngineWatch.com. Available: "},{"key":"e_1_2_9_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1300\/J136v05n02_02"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_24_1","unstructured":"Van Welie Martijn. (2002).Web design patterns. Available at: "},{"key":"e_1_2_9_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.1157"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_26_1","unstructured":"Wolfram D.(2000).Query\u2010Level examination of end user searching behaviour on the Excite search engine. In Kublik Angela Canadian Association for Information Science Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference. Available: