{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,21]],"date-time":"2025-10-21T00:44:52Z","timestamp":1761007492637,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,11]],"date-time":"2012-01-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1326240000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":375,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Proc of Assoc for Info"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>This paper describes the results from using four counting methods that represented three different counting approaches \u2013 i.e., whole counting, straight counting, and fractional counting, on university rankings based on H\u2010index. Using a large bibliometric dataset that contained 20 years of physics research papers and citations from Web of Science, we tested the methods on the data and sorted 299 universities based on H\u2010index scores. Prior to the counting and sorting, the original WOS data were carefully controlled to ensure that papers and citations of each university were identified and correctly differentiated in the analyses. Findings showed that the three counting approaches did result in observable differences in h\u2010index scores and institution ranks.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/meet.2011.14504801191","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,11]],"date-time":"2012-01-11T12:23:03Z","timestamp":1326284583000},"page":"1-6","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Counting methods &amp; university ranking by H\u2010index"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"48","author":[{"given":"Mu\u2010hsuan","family":"Huang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Chi\u2010Shiou","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-006-0090-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-006-0144-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.20823"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-005-0239-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_1","unstructured":"Gauffriau M. &Larsen P. O.(2005b).Different outcomes of different counting methods for publications and citations. In P. Ingwersen & B. Larsen (Eds.) Proceedings of ISSI 2005(pp.242\u2013246). Stockholm: Karolinska University Press."},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-007-1800-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-007-1934-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_1","unstructured":"HEEACT. (n.d.\u2010a).Methodology.RetrievedMay 30th 2011 fromhttp:\/\/ranking.heeact.edu.tw\/en\u2010us\/2010\/Page\/Methodology"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_1","unstructured":"HEEACT. (n.d.\u2010b).2010 by Subject Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for World Universities. Retrieved May 30th 2011 http:\/\/ranking.heeact.edu.tw\/en\u2010us\/2010%20by%20Subject\/Page\/Methodology"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hirsch J. E.(2005).An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 (46) 16569\u201316572.","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.0507655102"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Huang M.\u2010H. Lin C.\u2010S. &Chen D.\u2010Z.(2011).Counting methods country rank changes and counting inflation in the assessment of national research productivity and impact.Manuscript submitted for publication.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.21625"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_5_13_1","first-page":"8","article-title":"H\u2010index: an evaluation indicator proposed by scientist","volume":"1","author":"Jin B. H.","year":"2006","journal-title":"Science Focus"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-007-1991-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_1","unstructured":"Rousseau R.(2006).New developments related to the Hirsch index [Electronic Version] fromhttp:\/\/eprits.rclis.org\/archive\/00006376"},{"volume-title":"The Organization of Information","year":"2004","author":"Taylor A.","key":"e_1_2_5_16_1"}],"container-title":["Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fmeet.2011.14504801191","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/meet.2011.14504801191","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,20]],"date-time":"2025-10-20T13:47:47Z","timestamp":1760968067000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/meet.2011.14504801191"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,1]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/meet.2011.14504801191"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/meet.2011.14504801191","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0044-7870","1550-8390"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0044-7870"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1550-8390"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,1]]}}}