{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,22]],"date-time":"2025-10-22T19:56:02Z","timestamp":1761162962109,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,27]],"date-time":"2016-12-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1482796800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":361,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Proc. Assoc. Info. Sci. Tech."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Google Scholar (GS) is a database that enables researchers to create their scholarly profiles and keeps track of, among others, their citation counts, and h\u2010 and i10\u2010index values. GS is now increasingly being used for research evaluation purposes. Although rich in bibliometric data, GS indexes some duplicate publications and citations, and therefore tends to inflate the citation counts to some extent. Based on a small sample of GS profiles of researchers, this paper aims to study the extent by which duplicates change the citation counts and metrics based thereupon. Findings show that duplicates in GS database somewhat inflates the citation metrics. The scale of the problem as well as the effect of dirty data on performance evaluations based on GS citations data need to be studied further using larger samples.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/pra2.2016.14505301098","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,27]],"date-time":"2016-12-27T06:08:13Z","timestamp":1482818893000},"page":"1-4","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Does dirty data affect google scholar citations?"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"53","author":[{"given":"G\u00fcleda","family":"Do\u011fan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Hacettepe University Turkey"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"\u0130pek","family":"\u015eencan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hacettepe University Turkey"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ya\u015far","family":"Tonta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hacettepe University Turkey"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/15440478.2014.972000"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/432423a"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_1","unstructured":"Connor J.(2011 November 16).Google Scholar citations open to all.Google Scholar blog.http:\/\/googlescholar.blogspot.com.tr\/2011\/11\/google-scholar-citations-open-to-all.html"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_1","unstructured":"Google Scholar. (2016a).About.https:\/\/scholar.google.com.tr\/intl\/tr\/scholar\/about.html"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_1","unstructured":"Google Scholar. (2016b).Citations.https:\/\/scholar.google.com.tr\/intl\/tr\/scholar\/citations.html"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_1","unstructured":"Harzing A\u2010W.(2016a February 6 \u2010 updated May 29).Publish or Perish.Harzing.com Research in International Management. (Blog post).http:\/\/www.harzing.com\/resources\/publish-or-perish"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_1","unstructured":"Harzing A\u2010W.(2016b February 6 \u2010 updated April 11).Google Scholar: A new data source for citation analysis.Harzing.com Research in International Management. (Blog post).http:\/\/www.harzing.com\/publications\/whitepapers\/google-scholar-a-new-data-source-for-citation-analysis"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-015-1798-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3354\/esep00076"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_1","unstructured":"Hassan S.andGillani U. A.(2016).Altmetrics of \u201caltmetrics\u201d using Google Scholar Twitter Mendeley Facebook Google\u2010plus CiteULike Blogs and Wiki.https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1603.07992"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.0507655102"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1108\/14684520510598066"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1108\/14684520610659201"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1108\/14684520610675816"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1108\/14684521211209581"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_17_1","unstructured":"Konkiel S.(2014 July 23).4 reasons why Google Scholar isn't as great as you think it is.Impactstory blog post.http:\/\/blog.impactstory.org\/googe-scholar-profiles-fail\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_18_1","unstructured":"L\u00f3pez\u2010C\u00f3zar E.D. Robinson\u2010Garc\u00eda N.andTorres\u2010Salinas D.(2014).The Google Scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators.Journal of the Association for Information"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23056"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jrsm.1158"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_21_1","unstructured":"Mart\u00edn\u2010Mart\u00edn A. Orduna\u2010Malea E. Ayll\u00f3n J.M.andL\u00f3pez\u2010C\u00f3zar E.D.(2016).The counting house measuring those who count: Presence of Bibliometrics Scientometrics Informetrics Webometrics and Altmetrics in the Google Scholar Citations ResearcherID ResearchGate Mendeley & Twitter.EC3 Working Papers 21. DOI:10.13140\/RG.2.1.4814.4402"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2016.04.017"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_23_1","unstructured":"Ranking Web of Universities. (2015).Top 2000 universities by Google Scholar citations.http:\/\/www.webometrics.info\/en\/node\/169"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_24_1","unstructured":"Ranking Web of Universities. (2016a).Objectives.http:\/\/www.webometrics.info\/en\/Objetives"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_25_1","unstructured":"Ranking Web of Universities. (2016b).Ranking of individuals by country (54 countries) Ranking Web of Researchers.http:\/\/www.webometrics.info\/en\/node\/116"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2012.11.012"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_27_1","unstructured":"URAP. (2016).Genel bilgi (General information).http:\/\/tr.urapcenter.org\/2010\/2010_10.php"}],"container-title":["Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fpra2.2016.14505301098","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fpra2.2016.14505301098","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/pra2.2016.14505301098","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,21]],"date-time":"2025-10-21T17:11:54Z","timestamp":1761066714000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/pra2.2016.14505301098"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,1]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/pra2.2016.14505301098"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pra2.2016.14505301098","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["2373-9231","2373-9231"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2373-9231"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2373-9231"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2016-12-27","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}