{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,21]],"date-time":"2025-10-21T16:41:54Z","timestamp":1761064914529,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":6,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,24]],"date-time":"2017-10-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1508803200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":296,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Proc. Assoc. Info. Sci. Tech."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title><jats:p>This study examined 155 open peer review (OPR) journals. Open peer review is an emerging phenomenon that can be characterized by two factors: transparency and openness. Transparency requires that the referee and the author are known to each other during the process; openness requires that referees' review reports are publicly accessible in the same way as the articles. The current practices of OPR by the open access (OA) journals vary in levels of transparency and openness. The purpose of the study is to understand the state\u2010of\u2010the\u2010art of OPR in publishing scientific research. The preliminary results show that the majority of the OPR journals are in the field of medicine and related. Identity of authors and reviewers may be revealed at different stages of the peer review process. As early as the time when a manuscript is submitted, the author can choose to have the manuscript under blind review or open review. For open review submissions, the reviewer must sign the report but can decline to review it. The review history, including comments, all versions of the manuscript, plus author's rebuttals, may be published alongside of the paper. The peer review process may be totally transparent and open without an editor in charge.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/pra2.2017.14505401170","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,24]],"date-time":"2017-10-24T03:35:36Z","timestamp":1508816136000},"page":"819-820","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["The state\u2010of\u2010the\u2010art of open peer review: Early adopters"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"54","author":[{"given":"Peiling","family":"Wang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Tennessee USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Iman","family":"Tahamtan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Tennessee USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_1","unstructured":"Belluz J. Plumer B. &Resnick B.(2016). The 7 biggest problems facing science according to 270 scientists.Voxhttp:\/\/www.vox.com\/2016\/7\/14\/12016710\/science-challeges-research-funding-peer-review-process"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3138\/jsp.44-4-001"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fncom.2012.00033"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_1","unstructured":"Soergel D. Adam S. &Andrew M.(2013).Open scholarship and peer review: A time for experimentation. TheProceedings of the 30th international conference on machine learning Atlanta Georgia USA."},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_1","unstructured":"Wang P. Rath M. Deike M. &Wu Q.(2016).Open peer review: An innovation in scientific publishing. Runner up of the Most Interesting Preliminary Results Paper TheiConference 2016(Philadelphia PA March 20\u201323).https:\/\/www.ideals.illinois.edu\/bitstream\/handle\/2142\/89432\/Wang315.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.20309\/jdis.201625"}],"container-title":["Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fpra2.2017.14505401170","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/pra2.2017.14505401170","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/pra2.2017.14505401170","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/pra2.2017.14505401170","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,21]],"date-time":"2025-10-21T16:24:28Z","timestamp":1761063868000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/pra2.2017.14505401170"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]},"references-count":6,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/pra2.2017.14505401170"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pra2.2017.14505401170","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["2373-9231","2373-9231"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2373-9231"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2373-9231"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2017-10-24","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}