{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,10]],"date-time":"2026-01-10T20:38:18Z","timestamp":1768077498740,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,24]],"date-time":"2017-10-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1508803200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":296,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Proc. Assoc. Info. Sci. Tech."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title><jats:p>User feedback is critical to improving the quality of open data. However, most open data publishers gather only anecdotal evidence about user experiences. This unstructured and informal commentary is, consequently, difficult to translate into actionable steps towards improving data quality. Drawing on user comments collected from Data.Gov \u2010 an open data portal providing access to thousands of datasets published by city, state, and federal government agencies in the USA \u2013 we inductively develop a classification of reported data quality issues. This poster presents preliminary findings from applying this coding scheme to all issues that users filed on Data.gov in 2015 and 2016. We suggest that our classification scheme can help open data publishers collect structured, actionable information to improve data quality.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/pra2.2017.14505401172","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,24]],"date-time":"2017-10-24T03:35:36Z","timestamp":1508816136000},"page":"824-826","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Integrating user feedback with open data quality models"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"54","author":[{"given":"Nicholas","family":"Weber","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Washington USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"An","family":"Yan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Washington USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","volume-title":"WWW2012","author":"Braunschweig K.","year":"2012"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","first-page":"249","article-title":"Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic","volume":"22","author":"Carletta J.","year":"1996","journal-title":"Computational linguistics"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-24826-9_19"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","unstructured":"Davies T.(2010).Open data democracy and public sector reform. A Look at Open Government Data Use from Data.Gov.Uk. (Dissertation)"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10580530.2012.716740"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","unstructured":"Martin S. Foulonneau M. Turki S. &Ihadjadene M.(2013 June).Open data: Barriers risks and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on eGovernment: ECEG (pp.301\u2013309)."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0894439315585734"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","first-page":"2","article-title":"Automated quality assessment of metadata across open data portals","volume":"8","author":"Neumaier S.","year":"2016","journal-title":"Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ)"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7717\/peerj.175"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","volume-title":"Understanding the content and features of open data portals in American cities","author":"Thorsby J.","year":"2016"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wickham H.(2015).rvest: Easily Harvest (Scrape) Web Pages. R package version 0.3. 1.","DOI":"10.32614\/CRAN.package.rvest"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Umbrich J. Neumaier S. &Polleres A.(2015 March).Towards assessing the quality evolution of open data portals. In Proceedings of ODQ2015: Open Data Quality: from Theory to Practice Workshop Munich Germany.","DOI":"10.1109\/FiCloud.2015.82"}],"container-title":["Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fpra2.2017.14505401172","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/pra2.2017.14505401172","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/pra2.2017.14505401172","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/pra2.2017.14505401172","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,21]],"date-time":"2025-10-21T16:19:29Z","timestamp":1761063569000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/pra2.2017.14505401172"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/pra2.2017.14505401172"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pra2.2017.14505401172","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["2373-9231","2373-9231"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2373-9231","type":"print"},{"value":"2373-9231","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2017-10-24","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}