{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,22]],"date-time":"2025-10-22T20:10:54Z","timestamp":1761163854422,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]],"date-time":"2019-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1548979200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":396,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Proc. Assoc. Info. Sci. Tech."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>This paper reports the results of an ongoing research to develop and validate scales for two psychological constructs: \u201cpreference diversity\u201d and \u201copenness to novelty\u201d, that we believe to be important factors in users' responses to movie recommendations. Question items were created based on literature review and the results of a focus group interview. A questionnaire interview that consists of the candidate question items were performed so the validation and purification of the scales can be performed (N=191). Through exploratory factor analysis, five items were eventually selected for each construct. A user study (N=293) were subsequently followed which collected both users' responses to the scales and their actual movie viewing history of a sample of 220 movies. The scales were shown to possess both stability and internal consistency. Results showed that the participants' preference diversity score were correlated with the diversity of the movies seen, as measured by the number of movies, the number of movie genres, and the average dissimilarity of the movies seen. Furthermore, those who have higher openness to novelty also tended to watch and appreciate more obscure films.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/pra2.2018.14505501053","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]],"date-time":"2019-02-01T16:52:19Z","timestamp":1549039939000},"page":"486-493","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["The development and validation of \u201cpreference diversity\u201d and \u201copenness to novelty\u201d scales for movie goers"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"55","author":[{"given":"Muh\u2010Chyun","family":"Tang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Library and Information Science National Taiwan University Taiwan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mei\u2010Mei","family":"Chang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Library and Information Science National Taiwan University Taiwan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sung\u2010Chien","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Information and Communication Shih\u2010Hsin University Taiwan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0167-8116(95)00037-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_1","unstructured":"Bradley K. &Smyth B.(2001).Improving recommendation diversity. In Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science (pp.75\u201384)."},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_1","unstructured":"Cantador I. Fern\u00e1ndez\u2010Tob\u00edas I. Bellog\u00edn A. Kosinski M. &Stillwell D.(2013 June).Relating Personality Types with User Preferences in Multiple Entertainment Domains. In UMAP Workshops Girona Spain."},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Celma \u00d2. &Herrera P.(2008).A new approach to evaluating novel recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems (pp.179\u2013186).","DOI":"10.1145\/1454008.1454038"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-13287-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chang Y. H. &Tang M. C.(2018 March).Serendipity with Music Streaming Services: The Mediating Role of User and Task Characteristics. In International Conference on Information (pp.435\u2013441). Springer Cham.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-78105-1_48"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4135\/9781446287866"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1944339.1944341"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/963770.963772"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11257-011-9112-x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1287\/mksc.1060.0223"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.elerap.2009.04.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McNee S. M. Riedl J. &Konstan J. A.(2006).Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In CHI'06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp.1097\u20131101).","DOI":"10.1145\/1125451.1125659"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pu P. Chen L. &Hu R.(2011).A user\u2010centric evaluation framework for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems (pp.157\u2013164).","DOI":"10.1145\/2043932.2043962"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rashid A. M. Albert I. Cosley D. Lam S. K. McNee S. M. Konstan J. A. &Riedl J.(2002).Getting to know you: learning new user preferences in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (pp.127\u2013134).","DOI":"10.1145\/502716.502737"},{"volume-title":"Communication of Innovations: A Cross\u2010Cultural Approach","year":"1971","author":"Rogers E. M.","key":"e_1_2_5_17_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1509\/jmkg.69.1.32.55512"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/cb.350"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tang M.C. Ke Y.L. &Sie Y.J.(2013).The Estimation of aNobii Users\u2019 Reading Diversity Using Book Co\u2010ownership Data: A Social Analytical Approach. In Social Informatics (pp.274\u2013283)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-03260-3_24"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ipm.2013.07.005"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vargas S. &Castells P.(2011).Rank and relevance in novelty and diversity metrics for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems (pp.109\u2013116).","DOI":"10.1145\/2043932.2043955"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wang H.C. &Doong H.S.(2010).Online customers\u2019 cognitive differences and their impact on the success of recommendation agents.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.im.2010.01.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.im.2010.01.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhang M. &Hurley N.(2008).Avoiding monotony: improving the diversity of recommendation lists. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems (pp.123\u2013130).","DOI":"10.1145\/1454008.1454030"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhou T. Kuscsik Z. Liu J.\u2010G. Medo M. Wakeling J.R. &Zhang Y.\u2010C.(2010).Solving the apparent diversity\u2010accuracy dilemma of recommender systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(10) 4511\u20134515.","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1000488107"}],"container-title":["Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fpra2.2018.14505501053","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/pra2.2018.14505501053","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/pra2.2018.14505501053","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/pra2.2018.14505501053","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,21]],"date-time":"2025-10-21T17:43:25Z","timestamp":1761068605000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/pra2.2018.14505501053"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/pra2.2018.14505501053"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pra2.2018.14505501053","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["2373-9231","2373-9231"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2373-9231"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2373-9231"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2019-02-01","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}