{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,26]],"date-time":"2025-10-26T14:11:24Z","timestamp":1761487884311,"version":"3.33.0"},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,3,27]],"date-time":"2007-03-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1174953600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":4833,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Robotic Syst."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1994,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Deformations occurring in a robot working in contact with a rigid environment is a real problem in the industrial world. This problem can be solved by taking into account forces undergone by the robot at the end\u2010effector level. The first part of this article is aimed at determining a force control scheme that satisfies this constraint and that can be implemented on a non\u2010modified industrial robot controller. Various existing force control schemes are investigated and the reasons for discarding them are given. Then, the emphasis is put on a so\u2010called external force control scheme, which seems to be a solution to our problem. The control law appearing in such a scheme is determined by means of a realistic robot simulator developed on a SUN workstation. A simple integral term on the force error gives acceptable results in various robot configurations. This is illustrated in the form of graphs. In a second part, the implementation of this external control scheme in a real PUMA 560 robot's UNIMATE controller is presented. Certain software issues and implementation solutions are pointed out. Several experiments are described. Once again, graphs are used to show the experimental results. \u00a9 1994 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/rob.4620110607","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,7,6]],"date-time":"2007-07-06T15:18:04Z","timestamp":1183735084000},"page":"523-540","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":27,"title":["External force control of an industrial puma 560 robot"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Eric D\u00e9goulange","family":"And","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Pierre","family":"Dauchez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2007,3,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K.Salisbury \u201cActive stiffness control of a manipulator in Cartesian coordinates \u201d Proc. 19th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control Albuquerque 1980 pp.95\u2013100.","DOI":"10.1109\/CDC.1980.272026"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/027836498700600101"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"N.Hogan \u201cStable execution of contact tasks using impedance control \u201d Proc. IEEE Conf. on Robotics and Automation Raleigh 1987 pp.1047\u20131054.","DOI":"10.1109\/ROBOT.1987.1087854"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1115\/1.3139652"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_2","unstructured":"M. T.Mason \u201cCompliance and force control for computer controlled manipulators \u201d MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Memo 515 1979."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_2","unstructured":"V.Perdereau \u201cContribution \u00e0 la commande hybride force\u2010position \u201d Th\u00e8se de Doctorat Universit\u00e9 Paris VI 1991(in French)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_2","unstructured":"X.Delebarre \u201cCommandes position et force de deux bras manipulateurs pour l'exploration plan\u00e9taire \u201d Th\u00e8se de Doctorat LIRMM Universit\u00e8 Montpellier II 1992(in French)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B.Armstrong O.Khatib andJ.Burdick \u201cThe explicit dynamic model and inertial parameters of the PUMA 560 arm \u201d Proc. IEEE Conf. on Robotics and Automation San Francisco 1986 pp.510\u2013518.","DOI":"10.1109\/ROBOT.1986.1087644"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B.Armstrong \u201cFriction: experimental determination modeling and compensation \u201d Proc. IEEE Conf. on Robotics and Automation Philadelphia 1988 pp.1422\u20131427.","DOI":"10.1109\/ROBOT.1988.12266"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"L. E.Pfeffer O.Khatib andJ.Hake \u201cJoint torque sensory feedback in the control of a PUMA manipulator \u201d Proc. IEEE Conf. on Robotics and Automation Scottsdale 1989 pp.418\u2013425.","DOI":"10.1109\/70.88056"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R.VolpeandP.Khosla \u201cAn experimental evaluation and comparison of explicit force control strategies for robotic manipulators \u201d Proc. IEEE Conf. on Robotics and Automation Nice 1992 pp.1387\u20131393.","DOI":"10.1109\/ROBOT.1992.220156"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Systems"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Frob.4620110607","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/rob.4620110607","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,18]],"date-time":"2025-01-18T07:47:36Z","timestamp":1737186456000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/rob.4620110607"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1994,1]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1994,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/rob.4620110607"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/rob.4620110607","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0741-2223","1097-4563"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0741-2223"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1097-4563"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1994,1]]}}}