{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,23]],"date-time":"2023-10-23T05:06:31Z","timestamp":1698037591423},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,3,22]],"date-time":"2007-03-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1174521600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":6289,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Systems &amp; Computers in Japan"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1990,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The evaluation of reliability is very important in developing software efficiently. This paper describes the construction of a software development\u2010assist tool, which executes the reliability evaluation of the software quantitatively in the testing phase. In this tool, the following models are employed for the analysis of the software error data. The stochastic models based on nonhomogeneous Poisson processes are exponential, delayed S\u2010shaped and inflection S\u2010shaped software reliability growth types. The deterministic regression models are logistic and Gomperz curve models. The procedure for evaluating the software reliability is as follows: The data observed in the testing phase are read in. The unknown parameters in each model are estimated, and the goodness\u2010of\u2010fit test of the estimated result is examined. The results of the estimation for the reliability evaluation measures as well as the observed data are displayed in the form of curves. The forementioned procedures are implemented in a program package, using BASIC language operating on MS\u2010DOS. Using the software reliability evaluation tool developed in this study, an executing example is presented based on the actually observed software error data.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/scj.4690210702","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,7,7]],"date-time":"2007-07-07T19:10:47Z","timestamp":1183835447000},"page":"12-22","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["A software reliability evaluation tool: Sret"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"21","author":[{"family":"Shigeru","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"family":"Shunji Osaki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"family":"Ryushi Isozaki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2007,3,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_2","volume-title":"Software Reliability: Principles and Practices","author":"Myers G. J.","year":"1976"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_2","volume-title":"Software Reliability: Measurement, Prediction, Application","author":"Musa J. D.","year":"1987"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_2","volume-title":"Software Reliability Assessment Technology","author":"Yamada S.","year":"1989"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_2","unstructured":"Nakamura Uchihira Sato andMizutani.A prediction method for software quality before testing phase. Nikkei Elect. Fab. 25 pp.233\u2013260(1985)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_2","first-page":"188","volume-title":"Reliability Theory and Applications","author":"Komuro Y.","year":"1987"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_2","first-page":"1093","article-title":"Software reliability technology\u2010Metrics for reliability evaluation","volume":"4","author":"Uemura","year":"1987","journal-title":"Nat. Conv. Inf. Proc. Soc. Jap."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.1985.232179"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.1987.231411"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_2","volume-title":"Repairable Systems Reliability: Modeling, Inference, Misconceptions, and Their Causes","author":"Ascher H.","year":"1984"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/TR.1979.5220566"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/TR.1983.5221735"},{"issue":"8","key":"e_1_2_1_13_2","first-page":"821","article-title":"S\u2010shaped software reliability growth models characterized by error detection rates","volume":"27","author":"Yamada S.","year":"1986","journal-title":"Trans. Inf. Proc. Soc. Jap."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_2","unstructured":"F.Kanno.Software Engineering. JUSE (1979)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_2","unstructured":"T.Mitsuhashi.Quality Evaluation of Software. JUSE (1981)."},{"issue":"12","key":"e_1_2_1_16_2","first-page":"2438","article-title":"Testing\u2010effort dependent software reliability growth models and comparisons of goodness\u2010of\u2010fit test effort","volume":"70","author":"Yamada S.","year":"1987","journal-title":"Trans. (D), I. E. C. I. E., Japan"}],"container-title":["Systems and Computers in Japan"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fscj.4690210702","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/scj.4690210702","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,22]],"date-time":"2023-10-22T07:38:30Z","timestamp":1697960310000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/scj.4690210702"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1990,1]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1990,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/scj.4690210702"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/scj.4690210702","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0882-1666","1520-684X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0882-1666","type":"print"},{"value":"1520-684X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1990,1]]}}}