{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,13]],"date-time":"2023-11-13T00:33:41Z","timestamp":1699835621059},"reference-count":5,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,10,27]],"date-time":"2006-10-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1161907200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":10832,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Softw Pract Exp"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1977,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>An example is provided from biostatistics to show that transformation to a unit normal deviate can be inadvisable. This is used to motivate a definition of commensurable units of measurement. An argument is presented to show that a unit cell size can be determined that is termed the \u2018least distinguishable difference\u2019. The recommended commensurable unit is obtained by reseating the least distinguishable difference to unity. Thus, the data are transformed to Integer\u2010valued variates.<\/jats:p><jats:p>Since the transformed data are integer\u2010valued and optimally ranged for integer accumulation, this is recommended. On most computers integer overflow is detectable, therefore in the absence of overflow one is assured that the intervening computation is correct.<\/jats:p><jats:p>A few concluding remarks are appended.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/spe.4380070203","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,11,17]],"date-time":"2006-11-17T12:33:55Z","timestamp":1163766835000},"page":"159-163","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["On the use of integer arithmetic to achieve confirmably correct computation"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"7","author":[{"given":"Peter M.","family":"Neely","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2006,10,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_2","unstructured":"P. M.Neely \u2018To standardize or not: I. The univariate approach\u2019 in prep."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_2","unstructured":"P. M.Neely \u2018On rescaling of data to commensurable units\u2019 in prep."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_2","unstructured":"ANSI X3.9\u20101966.American Standard FORTRAN available from C.B.E.M.A. 1828 L Street NW Washington D.C. (1966)."},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_2_1_5_2","first-page":"854","article-title":"Comparison of several algorithms for computing sample means and variances","volume":"69","author":"Ling R. F.","year":"1974","journal-title":"ASA Journal"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_2","unstructured":"P. M.Neely \u2018Implementation independent arithmetic; speculation for discussion\u2019 submitted to Software\u2014Practice & Experience to be published."}],"container-title":["Software: Practice and Experience"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fspe.4380070203","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/spe.4380070203","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,12]],"date-time":"2023-11-12T09:22:39Z","timestamp":1699780959000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/spe.4380070203"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1977,3]]},"references-count":5,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1977,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/spe.4380070203"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/spe.4380070203","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0038-0644","1097-024X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0038-0644","type":"print"},{"value":"1097-024X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1977,3]]}}}