{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,19]],"date-time":"2026-10-19T09:40:48Z","timestamp":1792402848824,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":6,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1789689600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1789689600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J Applied Clin Med Phys"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Quantification of low activity samples using gamma counters is a common technique when investigating the biodistribution of experimental radiopharmaceuticals. Several human and pre\u2010clinical trials have investigated\n                      <jats:sup>89<\/jats:sup>\n                      Zr labeled compounds, utilizing gamma counter to quantify activity in blood or animal samples. While the performance of gamma counters has been investigated for other positron emitting radionuclides, the more complex spectrum, including a 909\u00a0keV gamma emission, and low positron fraction of\n                      <jats:sup>89<\/jats:sup>\n                      Zr may reduce both counting efficiency while increasing the severity of count rate losses.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The purpose of this study is to evaluate both the counting efficiency and the effect of count rate losses on the quantitation of activity for\n                      <jats:sup>89<\/jats:sup>\n                      Zr using NaI(Tl) gamma counters.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Sources of known activity (initially 78.3 kBq) were measured in a gamma counter as they decayed over approximately 15 days. Observed count rates were fit with a paralyzable detector model for two separate energy windows, 511\u00a0keV\u00a0\u00b1\u00a010% and 909\u00a0keV\u00a0\u00b1\u00a010%, as well as their sum. Counting efficiency in the absence of losses as well as the effective deadtime for each dataset were calculated.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Count rates for each energy window were well fit with a paralyzable model with\n                      <jats:italic>R<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u00a0&gt;\u00a00.999. Counting efficiency (mean\u00a0\u00b1\u00a095% confidence interval) was 10.07%\u00a0\u00b1\u00a00.07%, 17.38%\u00a0\u00b1\u00a00.13%, and 27.46%\u00a0\u00b1\u00a00.16% for the 511\u00a0keV, 909\u00a0keV, and summed energy windows respectively. Effective dead time (mean, 95% confidence interval) was 14.31 \u00b5s, (13.30 \u00b5s\u201315.30 \u00b5s), 7.11 \u00b5s (6.68 \u00b5s\u20137.55 \u00b5s), and 4.77 \u00b5s (4.48 \u00b5s\u20135.06 \u00b5s) for the 511\u00a0keV, 909\u00a0keV, and summed energy windows respectively.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Counting efficiency and count rate performance for\n                      <jats:sup>89<\/jats:sup>\n                      Zr are poorer than for other positron emitting radionuclides. Count rate losses follow the paralyzable model and are correctible.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/acm2.70788","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T16:31:23Z","timestamp":1789749083000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Calibration and count rate performance of NaI(Tl) gamma counters for quantifying the activity\n                    <sup>89<\/sup>\n                    Zr radiopharmaceuticals"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"27","author":[{"given":"Michael","family":"Silosky","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus  Aurora Colorado USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_9_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s41181\u2010025\u201000418\u20108"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/ijms21124309"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nucmedbio.2020.09.001"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s40658\u2010015\u20100114\u20103"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nucmedbio.2012.08.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1118\/1.4792297"}],"container-title":["Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/acm2.70788","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/acm2.70788","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/acm2.70788","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,19]],"date-time":"2026-10-19T08:54:18Z","timestamp":1792400058000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/acm2.70788"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]]},"references-count":6,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/acm2.70788"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/acm2.70788","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1526-9914","1526-9914"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1526-9914","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-9914","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-05-25","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2026-08-17","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2026-09-18","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}],"article-number":"e70788"}}