{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T14:26:27Z","timestamp":1786976787320,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,1,19]],"date-time":"2007-01-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1169164800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":4950,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["American J Industrial Med"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1993,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>This longitudinal epidemiologic study was designed to investigate hearing loss over a 5\u2010year period among noise\u2010exposed employees of a large automobile company and to assess effectiveness of hearing conservation programs at locations representing the spectrum of operations (assembly, light manufacturing, heavy manufacturing and machining, metal fabrication, and founding). Based on computerized audiometric test data, the study summarizes methodology developed for measuring occupational hearing loss and its application in evaluating programs at these locations, which had maximal 8\u2010hr time\u2010weighted average (TWA) noise exposures ranging from 104 to 110 dB(A). Methods presented here provide for consideration of age and hearing level of study subjects at baseline audiogram and clearly demonstrate the extent of hearing loss during the study period. Among five study locations, the average hearing loss at 2,000\u20134,000 Hz in the worst\u2010loss ear ranged from 3.4 to 6.2 dB over the follow\u2010up period; after adjustment for presbycusis, the loss was less than 2 dB at all but one location, which showed a loss of nearly 4 dB. In comparison to a control group of nonnoise\u2010exposed employees, hearing conservation programs at four of the five locations were judged to be effective. One location, a metal fabrication plant with a large percentage of employees having an 8\u2010hr TWA noise exposure over 90 dB(A), was particularly noted for the effectiveness of its program. \u00a9 1993 Wiley\u2010Liss, Inc.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/ajim.4700240105","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,4,20]],"date-time":"2007-04-20T06:53:42Z","timestamp":1177052022000},"page":"41-54","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Five\u2010year follow\u2010up study of hearing loss at several locations within a large automobile company"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Anna","family":"Lee\u2010Feldstein","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2007,1,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","unstructured":"Accredited Standards Committee S12 Noise(1991): \u201cDraft American National Standard Evaluating the Effectiveness of Hearing Conservation Programs.\u201d New York: Acoustical Society of America Document DRAFT ANSI S12.13\u20131991."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Industrial Noise Manual","author":"American Industrial Hygiene Association","year":"1975"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","unstructured":"Armitage P(1971): \u201cStatistical Methods in Medical Research.\u201d Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications pp288\u2013301 384\u2013388."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/annhyg\/7.4.323"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","first-page":"92","volume-title":"SAS System for Linear Models, 1986 ed","author":"Freund R","year":"1986"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00028896409342582"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"652","DOI":"10.1093\/milmed\/150.12.652","article-title":"A prevalence study of hearing conservation in the United States Naval Submarine Force","volume":"150","author":"Gwin L","year":"1985","journal-title":"Military Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/15298668291410035"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00043764-198412000-00006"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","unstructured":"Hornstra M VanPeenan P(1989): An epidemiological analysis of hearing test results. Paper presented at the 1989 Industrial Hearing Conservation Conference University of Kentucky Lexington April 1989 pp33\u201338."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","first-page":"98","volume-title":"Handbook of Clinical Audiology, Second Edition","author":"Katz J","year":"1978"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","volume-title":"The Effects of Noise on Man","author":"Kryter KD","year":"1985"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/0002889778507875"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00043764-197501000-00004"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/15298668491400106"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00043764-198608000-00003"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1121\/1.1908841"},{"issue":"46","key":"e_1_2_1_19_1","first-page":"9738","article-title":"Occupational noise exposure; hearing conservation amendment; final rule","volume":"48","author":"Occupational Safety and Health Administration","year":"1983","journal-title":"Fed Register"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/0002889728506610"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/0002889738506811"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/15298668191420468"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_23_1","unstructured":"RobinsonDW SuttonGJ(1978): \u201cComparative Analysis of Data on the Relation of Pure\u2010Tone Audiometric Thresholds to Age.\u201d NPL Acoustics Rep. AC 84 British A.R.C."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00043764-198610000-00029"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/15298668091424339"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_26_1","first-page":"649","article-title":"Hearing loss and intermittent noise exposure","volume":"26","author":"Sataloff J","year":"1984","journal-title":"J Occup Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_27_1","unstructured":"SataloffRT Sataloff J(1987): \u201cOccupational Hearing Loss.\u201d Philadelphia: B Lippincott."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/15298668791384300"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/0002889708506259"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1121\/1.1909580"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_31_1","first-page":"351","article-title":"Inter industry noise study. The effects upon hearing of steady state noise between 82 and 92 dBA","volume":"20","author":"Yerg R","year":"1978","journal-title":"J Occup Med"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Industrial Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fajim.4700240105","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ajim.4700240105","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,25]],"date-time":"2023-10-25T11:06:15Z","timestamp":1698231975000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/ajim.4700240105"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1993,7]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1993,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/ajim.4700240105"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ajim.4700240105","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0271-3586","1097-0274"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0271-3586","type":"print"},{"value":"1097-0274","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1993,7]]}}}