{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]],"date-time":"2026-07-29T17:03:48Z","timestamp":1785344628675,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,15]],"date-time":"2026-06-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1781481600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,15]],"date-time":"2026-06-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1781481600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n Biologic augmentation of rotator cuff repair continues to evolve as surgeons attempt to improve healing in an inherently biologically limited environment. Autograft options, particularly the long head of the biceps tendon, offer an attractive, readily available scaffold with theoretical advantages over allograft and synthetic patch technologies. This commentary discusses the emerging role of a compressed biceps autograft patch technique for rotator cuff augmentation and its potential to reduce structural failure while maintaining excellent patient\u2010reported outcomes. Biologic augmentation must balance simplicity, cost, and reproducibility against theoretical improvements in tendon healing. The concept of using discarded native tissue as a structured biologic implant is particularly appealing because it avoids immunogenicity, reduces cost, and integrates seamlessly into the standard arthroscopic workflow. However, enthusiasm must be tempered by recognition of the limitations inherent to early, single\u2010surgeon series and short\u2010term imaging follow\u2010up. Overall, the biceps autograft patch represents one of the more pragmatic biologic augmentation strategies currently described, but its true value will depend on reproducibility, comparative effectiveness, and longer\u2010term outcomes. The key question is not whether it works in select hands, but whether it can be standardized and scaled.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/arj.70402","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T03:10:38Z","timestamp":1781579438000},"page":"1355-1357","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Editorial Commentary<\/i>\n : The \u201cBiceps Smash\u201d for Rotator Cuff Augmentation\u2014A Cost\u2010Free Biologic Patch That May Shift the Repair Paradigm"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"42","author":[{"given":"Andrew","family":"George","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Houston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine Houston Texas U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_3_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2023.08.072"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465231185345"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asmr.2021.07.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2024.05.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1347","DOI":"10.1002\/arj.70379","article-title":"Rotator cuff repair augmentation with an autograft biceps patch, the \u201cbiceps smash,\u201d results in low retear rates at 6 months and promising clinical outcomes at 12 months","volume":"42","author":"Brinkman JC","year":"2026","journal-title":"Arthroscopy"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2021.05.064"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eats.2022.08.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2024.09.029"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546518810763"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/23259671231179449"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2018.10.013"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eats.2022.11.020"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2022.01.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2024.09.028"}],"container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/arj.70402","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/arj.70402","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/arj.70402","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]],"date-time":"2026-07-29T16:56:55Z","timestamp":1785344215000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/arj.70402"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,15]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/arj.70402"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/arj.70402","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0749-8063","1526-3231"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0749-8063","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-3231","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-06-15","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}