{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,23]],"date-time":"2026-08-23T17:10:34Z","timestamp":1787505034519,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,11,21]],"date-time":"2008-11-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1227225600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Birth Defects Research Pt B"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    High\u2010dose gavage exposure to ethylene glycol (EG) is teratogenic in rats, but not rabbits. To investigate the reason for this species difference, toxicokinetic and whole embryo culture (WEC) studies were conducted in gestation day 9 New Zealand White rabbits, and the data compared to very similar data previously generated in pregnant rats. In the toxicokinetic study, maximal levels of unchanged EG in rabbits were comparable to those reported for rats. However, maximal levels of EG's teratogenic metabolite, glycolic acid (GA), in rabbit maternal blood and embryo were only 46% and 10% of the respective levels in rats. The toxicokinetic profile suggested that the lower GA levels in rabbits were due to a slower rate of maternal metabolism of EG to GA, slow uptake of GA into the yolk sac cavity fluid which surrounds the embryo, and negligible transfer via the visceral yolk sac (VYS) placenta. In the WEC study, exposure of rabbit conceptuses to high concentrations (\u226412.5\u2009mM) of GA was without effect, which contrasts with reported effects in rat WEC at \u22653\u2009mM. Overall, these data implicate toxicokinetics as an important factor underlying the species difference, although intrinsic insensitivity of the rabbit embryo might also be involved. Integration of these findings with published human data suggest that the rabbit is the more relevant model for human EG exposure, based on the negligible role of the rabbit VYS in placental transfer (humans lack a VYS) and similar rates of EG metabolism and extraembryonic fluid turnover.\n                    <jats:italic>Birth Defects Res (Part B)<\/jats:italic>\n                    2008. \u00a9 2008 Wiley\u2010Liss, Inc.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/bdrb.20178","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,11,21]],"date-time":"2008-11-21T13:42:27Z","timestamp":1227274947000},"page":"573-581","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":30,"title":["Species\u2010specificity of ethylene glycol\u2010induced developmental toxicity: toxicokinetic and whole embryo culture studies in the rabbit"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"83","author":[{"given":"Edward W.","family":"Carney","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Belen","family":"Tornesi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daniel A.","family":"Markham","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Reza J.","family":"Rasoulpour","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nigel","family":"Moore","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2008,11,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00498250310001624636"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0890-6238(94)90017-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/toxsci\/50.1.117"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1096-9926(199601)53:1<38::AID-TERA5>3.0.CO;2-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","first-page":"139","article-title":"Ethylene glycol kinetics in pregnant rats: differences between slow and fast dose\u2010rate exposures","volume":"66","author":"Carney EW","year":"2002","journal-title":"Toxicologist"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/bdrc.20027"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/bdrb.20118"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1071\/RD9960911"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/toxsci\/kfi119"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10408440591007322"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00498259609050263"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2004.01.022"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0278-6915(02)00326-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70157-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019272"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/tera.1420410403"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/tera.1420440306"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0887-2333(01)00083-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/15287398209530262"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/01480549908993168"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/323276a0"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1006\/faat.1995.1115"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.reprotox.2004.01.003"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/toxsci\/62.1.10"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0041-008X(85)90126-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0378-4274(85)90008-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10408440591007133"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.taap.2004.06.027"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_30_1","first-page":"262","article-title":"Changes in pH gradients, protein and osmolarity of the rabbit conceptus during gestation","volume":"68","author":"Tornesi B","year":"2003","journal-title":"Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1006\/faat.1993.1052"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_32_1","first-page":"63798","article-title":"EPA guidelines for developmental toxicity risk assessment","volume":"56","author":"United States Environmental Protection Agency","year":"1991","journal-title":"Fed Reg"}],"container-title":["Birth Defects Research Part B: Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fbdrb.20178","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/bdrb.20178","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,14]],"date-time":"2023-11-14T14:26:32Z","timestamp":1699971992000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/bdrb.20178"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,11,21]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/bdrb.20178"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bdrb.20178","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1542-9733","1542-9741"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1542-9733","type":"print"},{"value":"1542-9741","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,11,21]]}}}