{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,16]],"date-time":"2026-10-16T19:58:22Z","timestamp":1792180702648,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":72,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,1]],"date-time":"2017-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1496275200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/journals\/pages\/open_access\/funder_policies\/chorus\/standard_publication_model"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,13]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate improvements in cosmetic results and postoperative morbidity for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) in comparison with multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC).<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>A literature search was undertaken for RCTs comparing SILC with MLC in adult patients with benign gallbladder disease. Primary outcomes were body image and cosmesis scores at different time points. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative pain and frequency of port-site hernia.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Thirty-seven RCTs were included, with a total of 3051 patients. The body image score favoured SILC at all time points (short term: mean difference (MD) \u20132\u00b709, P &amp;lt; 0\u00b7001; mid term: MD \u22121\u00b733, P &amp;lt; 0\u00b7001), as did the cosmesis score (short term: MD 3\u00b720, P &amp;lt; 0\u00b7001; mid term: MD 4\u00b703, P &amp;lt; 0\u00b7001; long-term: MD 4\u00b787, P = 0\u00b705) and the wound satisfaction score (short term: MD 1\u00b719, P = 0\u00b703; mid term: MD 1\u00b738, P &amp;lt; 0\u00b7001; long-term: MD 1\u00b719, P = 0\u00b702). Duration of operation was longer for SILC (MD 13\u00b756 min; P &amp;lt; 0\u00b7001) and SILC required more additional ports (odds ratio (OR) 6\u00b778; P &amp;lt; 0\u00b7001). Postoperative pain assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS) was lower for SILC at 12 h after operation (MD in VAS score \u22120\u00b780; P = 0\u00b7007). The incisional hernia rate was higher after SILC (OR 2\u00b750, P = 0\u00b703). All other outcomes were similar for both groups.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>SILC is associated with better outcomes in terms of cosmesis, body image and postoperative pain. The risk of incisional hernia is four times higher after SILC than after MLC.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.10574","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,1]],"date-time":"2017-06-01T10:56:40Z","timestamp":1496314600000},"page":"1141-1159","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":106,"title":["Meta-analysis of single-port <i>versus<\/i> conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"104","author":[{"given":"R","family":"Haueter","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Olten, Olten, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T","family":"Sch\u00fctz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Olten, Olten, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"D A","family":"Raptis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Olten, Olten, Switzerland"},{"name":"Department of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P-A","family":"Clavien","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M","family":"Zuber","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Olten, Olten, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1007\/s11894-005-0051-8","article-title":"Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: has the paradigm changed in the 21st century?","volume":"7","author":"Shaffer","year":"2005","journal-title":"Curr Gastroenterol Rep"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0002","article-title":"Die erste Cholecystektomie durch das Laparaskop","volume-title":"103 Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft f\u00fcr Chirurgie","author":"M\u00fche","year":"1986"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(05)80929-8","article-title":"National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"165","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1097\/00004836-199412000-00015","article-title":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: from gimmick to gold standard","volume":"19","author":"Begos","year":"1994","journal-title":"J Clin Gastroenterol"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00299168","article-title":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an original three-trocar technique","volume":"19","author":"Slim","year":"1995","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-001-9090-x","article-title":"A new technique for two-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"16","author":"Mori","year":"2002","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0007","first-page":"695","article-title":"One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"84","author":"Navarra","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.142.3.295","article-title":"New developments in surgery: natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)","volume":"142","author":"de la Fuente","year":"2007","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surge.2014.01.009","article-title":"Single incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: up-dated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials","volume":"12","author":"Milas","year":"2014","journal-title":"Surgeon"},{"issue":"2","key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0010","first-page":"CD007109","article-title":"Fewer-than-four ports versus four ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy","author":"Gurusamy","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"528","DOI":"10.1177\/1553350614521017","article-title":"Single-incision versus standard multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of experimental and observational studies","volume":"21","author":"Tamini","year":"2014","journal-title":"Surg Innov"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"b2700","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b2700","article-title":"The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration","volume":"339","author":"Liberati","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1334","DOI":"10.1007\/s004649900851","article-title":"Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease","volume":"12","author":"Dunker","year":"1998","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"728","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001474","article-title":"Cosmesis and body image in patients undergoing single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial (SPOCC-trial)","volume":"262","author":"Lurje","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.024","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"216","author":"Marks","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.3109\/08941939.2013.856497","article-title":"A randomized clinical trial comparing 4-port, 3-port, and single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"27","author":"Khorgami","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Invest Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2823","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2253-0","article-title":"Transvaginal cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study","volume":"26","author":"Solomon","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9003","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of single-port, minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"100","author":"Saad","year":"2013","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e3182631a9a","article-title":"Single-port versus multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial","volume":"22","author":"Sasaki","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9393","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of single- versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"101","author":"J\u00f8rgensen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1695","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7689","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"98","author":"Bucher","year":"2011","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1254","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2589-5","article-title":"A prospective, randomized comparison of pain, inflammatory response, and short-term outcomes between single port and laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"27","author":"Luna","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3182192f89","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"254","author":"Ma","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1177\/1553350613499454","article-title":"Inflammation in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"21","author":"Madureira","year":"2014","journal-title":"Surg Innov"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1080\/110241599750007478","article-title":"Elective transumbilical compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"165","author":"Bresadola","year":"1999","journal-title":"Eur J Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0027","first-page":"38","article-title":"Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILS)","volume":"27","author":"Mehmood","year":"2011","journal-title":"Pak J Med Sci"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0028","first-page":"243","article-title":"Outcome of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis \u2013 a randomized control trial","volume":"8","author":"Rizwi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Pak J Med Sci"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-011-1921-9","article-title":"Alpha-defensins and hsCRP levels in inflammatory response of standard and laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy","volume":"26","author":"Tsimogiannis","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1842","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-010-0887-3","article-title":"Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"24","author":"Tsimoyiannis","year":"2010","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-9941.97586","article-title":"Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised comparison of clinical results of 140 cases","volume":"8","author":"Vilallonga","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Minim Access Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2010.11.885","article-title":"Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study","volume":"166","author":"Aprea","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Surg Res"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3108","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-013-2914-7","article-title":"Patient-reported outcomes after single-incision versus traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective trial","volume":"27","author":"Brown","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e31822cfacd","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term operative outcomes","volume":"21","author":"Cao","year":"2011","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1896","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2625-5","article-title":"Quality-of-life measures after single-access versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study","volume":"27","author":"Abd Ellatif","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ciresp.2012.07.009","article-title":"A randomised prospective comparative study between laparoscopic cholecystectomy and single port cholecystectomy in a major outpatient surgery unit","volume":"90","author":"Herrero Fonollosa","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cir Esp"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7087","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"97","author":"Lee","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2010.06.019","article-title":"Laparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a pilot randomized trial","volume":"202","author":"Lirici","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v19.i3.394","article-title":"Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study","volume":"19","author":"Pan","year":"2013","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0040","first-page":"595","article-title":"Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy \u2013 a new advantage of gallbladder surgery","volume":"34","author":"Ra\u0161i\u0107","year":"2010","journal-title":"Coll Antropol"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0041","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e3182402448","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study","volume":"22","author":"Sinan","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.4174\/jkss.2013.85.4.149","article-title":"Effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy techniques on postoperative pain: a prospective randomized study","volume":"85","author":"Yilmaz","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Korean Surg Soc"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.3109\/13645706.2011.577787","article-title":"Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study","volume":"21","author":"Zheng","year":"2012","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"897","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-014-2903-6","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial comparing post-operative pain in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"39","author":"Chang","year":"2015","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"739","DOI":"10.9738\/INTSURG-D-13-00234.1","article-title":"One, two, or three ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?","volume":"99","author":"Justo-Janeiro","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0046","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4284","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-013-3044-y","article-title":"Prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing the use of a single-port device with that of a flexible endoscope with no other device for transumbilical cholecystectomy: LLATZER-FSIS pilot study","volume":"27","author":"Noguera","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0047","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.4174\/jkss.2013.85.6.275","article-title":"The comparison of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study","volume":"85","author":"Deveci","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Korean Surg Soc"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2010.12.009","article-title":"Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"202","author":"Lai","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0049","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"662","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2013.04.043","article-title":"Single-incision results in similar pain and quality of life scores compared with multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a blinded prospective randomized trial of 100 patients","volume":"154","author":"Zapf","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"877","DOI":"10.1007\/s12262-014-1044-3","article-title":"Comparison of cosmetic outcome between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in rural Indian population: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"77","author":"Borle","year":"2014","journal-title":"Indian J Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0051","first-page":"1","article-title":"Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus the classical four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective clinical trial","volume":"69","author":"Telciler","year":"2014","journal-title":"Minerva Chir"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0052","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2011.10784.x","article-title":"Importance of cosmesis to patients undergoing renal surgery: a comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS), laparoscopic and open surgery","volume":"110","author":"Olweny","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0053","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.4293\/108680813X13693422520396","article-title":"Patient perception of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"17","author":"Joseph","year":"2013","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0054","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-011-1785-2","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: do patients care?","volume":"16","author":"Bencsath","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.4293\/108680810X12924466007728","article-title":"Port-site hernia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"14","author":"Bunting","year":"2010","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0056","first-page":"482","article-title":"Long-term follow-up shows no difference in port-site hernia incidence: single incision vs. traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"27","author":"Pasley","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0057","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4750","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-016-4802-4","article-title":"Tips and tricks to avoid bile duct injury in SILC: an experience of 500 cases","volume":"30","author":"Li","year":"2016","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0058","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"736","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v22.i2.736","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for biliary tract disease","volume":"22","author":"Chuang","year":"2016","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0059","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"991","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7486","article-title":"Impact of single-port cholecystectomy on postoperative pain","volume":"98","author":"Asakuma","year":"2011","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2007.01488.x","article-title":"Laparoscopic vs. small incision cholecystectomy: implications for pulmonary function and pain. A randomized clinical trial","volume":"52","author":"Keus","year":"2008","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0061","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v20.i3.843","article-title":"Remains of the day: biliary complications related to single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"20","author":"Allemann","year":"2014","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3182583fde","article-title":"Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a higher bile duct injury rate: a review and a word of caution","volume":"256","author":"Joseph","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0063","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e31821a9dbf","article-title":"Right diaphragm injury: an unusual complication in single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"21","author":"Hosogi","year":"2011","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0064","first-page":"286","article-title":"The outcomes of SILS cholecystectomy in comparison with classic four-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"7","author":"Kurpiewski","year":"2012","journal-title":"Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0065","first-page":"139","article-title":"Single incision laparoscopic surgery cholecystectomy in children \u2013 preliminary experience","volume":"5","author":"\u0141osin","year":"2010","journal-title":"Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0066","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"652","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2010.07.008","article-title":"The learning curve of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) cholecystectomy: definable, short, and safe","volume":"211","author":"Hernandez","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0067","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2954","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-010-1070-6","article-title":"Single-port cholecystectomy: small scar, short learning curve","volume":"24","author":"Solomon","year":"2010","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0068","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4786","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v19.i29.4786","article-title":"Learning curve of transumbilical suture-suspension single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"19","author":"Pan","year":"2013","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0069","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2092","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-011-1144-1","article-title":"Learning curve of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILS): a preliminary study of 80 selected patients with benign gallbladder diseases","volume":"35","author":"Qiu","year":"2011","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1205","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-015-4332-5","article-title":"Impact of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) procedures on surgeon stress and workload: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"30","author":"Abdelrahman","year":"2016","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0071","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3310","DOI":"10.4103\/0366-6999.171422","article-title":"Randomized trial of immediate postoperative pain following single-incision versus traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"128","author":"Guo","year":"2015","journal-title":"Chin Med J (Engl)"},{"key":"2021020617361008400_bjs10574-bib-0072","article-title":"Multi-port versus single-port cholecystectomy: results of a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (MUSIC trial)","author":"Arezzo","year":"2016","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"}],"container-title":["British Journal of Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fbjs.10574","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article-pdf\/104\/9\/1141\/36207569\/bjs10574.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article-pdf\/104\/9\/1141\/36207569\/bjs10574.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,20]],"date-time":"2021-05-20T14:18:17Z","timestamp":1621520297000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article\/104\/9\/1141-1159\/6095069"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,1]]},"references-count":72,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,13]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bjs.10574","relation":{},"ISSN":["0007-1323","1365-2168"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0007-1323","type":"print"},{"value":"1365-2168","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,1]]}}}