{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,21]],"date-time":"2026-09-21T21:25:44Z","timestamp":1790025944569,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,1]],"date-time":"2018-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1514764800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/journals\/pages\/open_access\/funder_policies\/chorus\/standard_publication_model"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate for duct-to-mucosa and invagination anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy is still debated. The aim of this RCT was to investigate the POPF rate for duct-to-mucosa versus invagination pancreaticojejunostomy.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Patients were stratified by pancreatic texture and diameter of the main pancreatic duct and randomized to the duct-to-mucosa or invagination group. The primary endpoint was the rate of clinically relevant POPF (defined as grade B or C). Secondary endpoints were suture material cost for pancreaticojejunostomy, drain insertion duration and duration of postoperative hospital stay.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Some 120 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy were included following consent. Clinically relevant POPF developed in six of 59 patients (10 per cent) in the invagination group and in 14 of 61 patients (23 per cent) in the duct-to-mucosa group (P = 0\u00b7077). Duration of drain insertion (6 versus 7 days respectively; P = 0\u00b7027) and postoperative hospital stay (19 versus 24 days; P = 0\u00b7015) were shorter in the invagination group. Subgroup analysis for 61 patients with a soft pancreas revealed a lower rate of clinically relevant POPF in the invagination group (10 per cent versus 42 per cent in the duct-to-mucosa group; P = 0\u00b7010). Among 20 patients with a clinically relevant POPF, the six patients in the invagination group had a shorter duration of drain insertion (38\u00b75 days versus 49 days for 14 patients in the duct-to-mucosa group; P = 0\u00b7028) and postoperative hospital stay (42 versus 54\u00b75 days respectively; P = 0\u00b7028).<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>This study did not demonstrate a superiority of invagination over duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy in the risk of POPF. However, in high-risk patients with a soft pancreas, invagination may reduce the risk of clinically relevant POPF compared with duct-to-mucosa. Registration number: UMIN000005890 (http:\/\/www.umin.ac.jp).<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.10727","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,23]],"date-time":"2017-12-23T09:45:48Z","timestamp":1514022348000},"page":"48-57","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":76,"title":["Randomized clinical trial of duct-to-mucosa <i>versus<\/i> invagination pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"105","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4590-5332","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Y","family":"Senda","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Centre Hospital , Nagoya,","place":["Japan"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Y","family":"Shimizu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Centre Hospital , Nagoya,","place":["Japan"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S","family":"Natsume","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Centre Hospital , Nagoya,","place":["Japan"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S","family":"Ito","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Centre Hospital , Nagoya,","place":["Japan"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"K","family":"Komori","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Centre Hospital , Nagoya,","place":["Japan"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T","family":"Abe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Centre Hospital , Nagoya,","place":["Japan"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"K","family":"Matsuo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Molecular Medicine, Aichi Cancer Centre Research Institute , Nagoya,","place":["Japan"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T","family":"Sano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Medical University Hospital , Aichi,","place":["Japan"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"773","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000000263","article-title":"A pancreatoduodenectomy risk model derived from 8575 cases from a national single-race population (Japanese) using a web-based data entry system: the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates for pancreatoduodenectomy","volume":"259","author":"Kimura","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4175","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v18.i31.4175","article-title":"Impact of surgical volume on nationwide hospital mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy","volume":"18","author":"Kim","year":"2012","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0003","first-page":"488","article-title":"Pancreatectomy risk calculator: an ACS-NSQIP resource","volume":"12","author":"Parikh","year":"2010","journal-title":"HPB(Oxford)"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1277","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.2011.294","article-title":"Predicting the risk of perioperative mortality in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: a novel scoring system","volume":"146","author":"Venkat","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4068","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-012-2585-y","article-title":"The impact of vascular resection on early postoperative outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy: an analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database","volume":"19","author":"Castleberry","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"769","DOI":"10.1007\/s00534-011-0429-y","article-title":"Dunking pancreaticojejunostomy versus duct-to-mucosa anastomosis","volume":"18","author":"Kennedy","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0007","first-page":"450","article-title":"Comparison of Wirsung-jejunal duct-to-mucosa and dunking technique for pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy","volume":"4","author":"Batignani","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"766","DOI":"10.1016\/S0039-6060(03)00345-3","article-title":"Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreatoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial","volume":"134","author":"Bassi","year":"2003","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"635","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-199506000-00003","article-title":"Optimal management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreatoduodenectomy","volume":"221","author":"Marcus","year":"1995","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"617","DOI":"10.1016\/S0039-6060(98)70199-0","article-title":"Management of continuous anastomosis of pancreatic duct and jejunal mucosa after pancreatoduodenectomy: historical study of 300 patients","volume":"123","author":"Tsuji","year":"1998","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"738","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2008.12.031","article-title":"Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial","volume":"208","author":"Berger","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c332","article-title":"CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials","volume":"340","author":"Schulz","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2005.05.001","article-title":"International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition","volume":"138","author":"Bassi","year":"2005","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00311562","article-title":"A simpler and more reliable technique of pancreatojejunal anastomosis","volume":"26","author":"Kakita","year":"1996","journal-title":"Surg Today"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae","article-title":"Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey","volume":"240","author":"Dindo","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1074","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.2009.193","article-title":"Measures to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: a comprehensive review","volume":"144","author":"Lai","year":"2009","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1900","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-015-2913-1","article-title":"Duct-to-mucosa versus invagination pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"19","author":"Hua","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2290","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-011-1159-7","article-title":"The methods of reconstruction of pancreatic digestive continuity after pancreatoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"35","author":"Yang","year":"2011","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"668","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.10160","article-title":"Randomized multicentre trial comparing external and internal pancreatic stenting during pancreatoduodenectomy","volume":"103","author":"Jang","year":"2016","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.10090","article-title":"Meta-analysis of drain amylase content on postoperative day 1 as a predictor of pancreatic fistula following pancreatic resection","volume":"103","author":"Giglio","year":"2016","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1196","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9553","article-title":"Meta-analysis of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy","volume":"101","author":"Xiong","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9362","article-title":"Diagnostic value of abdominal drainage in individual risk assessment of pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy","volume":"101","author":"Ansorge","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.8654","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of external stent drainage of the pancreatic duct to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticojejunostomy","volume":"99","author":"Motoi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1147","DOI":"10.3109\/00365521.2016.1169317","article-title":"Risk factors and preventive strategies for post-operative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery: a comprehensive review","volume":"51","author":"S\u00f8reide","year":"2016","journal-title":"Scand J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002","article-title":"A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy","volume":"216","author":"Callery","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1076","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.8784","article-title":"Structured intraoperative assessment of pancreatic gland characteristics in predicting complications after pancreatoduodenectomy","volume":"99","author":"Ansorge","year":"2012","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-007-9388-5","article-title":"Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme","volume":"32","author":"Pratt","year":"2008","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2008.03.004","article-title":"Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade C) after pancreatoduodenectomy: incidence, prognosis, and risk factors","volume":"197","author":"Fuks","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1579","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-010-0521-5","article-title":"Risk-adapted anastomosis for partial pancreatoduodenectomy reduces the risk of pancreatic fistula: a pilot study","volume":"34","author":"Niedergethmann","year":"2010","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2015.02.002","article-title":"Comparative study between duct to mucosa and invagination pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study","volume":"16","author":"El Nakeeb","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1007\/s005340170022","article-title":"History of pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreatoduodenectomy: development of a more reliable anastomosis technique","volume":"8","author":"Kakita","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg"},{"key":"2024092914165974100_bjs10727-bib-0032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"422","DOI":"10.1097\/MPA.0b013e318175ddd0","article-title":"The gray zone between postpancreatoduodenectomy collections and pancreatic fistula","volume":"37","author":"Barreto","year":"2008","journal-title":"Pancreas"}],"container-title":["Journal of British Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fbjs.10727","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article-pdf\/105\/1\/48\/59433220\/bjs10727.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article-pdf\/105\/1\/48\/59433220\/bjs10727.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,29]],"date-time":"2024-09-29T14:17:19Z","timestamp":1727619439000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article\/105\/1\/48\/6123093"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,1]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bjs.10727","relation":{},"ISSN":["0007-1323","1365-2168"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0007-1323","type":"print"},{"value":"1365-2168","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,1]]}}}