{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,29]],"date-time":"2025-10-29T13:02:07Z","timestamp":1761742927867},"reference-count":5,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[1995,10,1]],"date-time":"1995-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":812505600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/journals\/pages\/open_access\/funder_policies\/chorus\/standard_publication_model"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1995,10,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>The outcome of suprapubic and urethral catheterization in abdominal surgery was compared in a prospective randomized trial. Twenty-eight patients received a suprapubic and 29 a urethral catheter. The groups were similar in terms of age, sex, operation performed and postoperative analgesia. There was no difference in the duration of catheterization (suprapubic: median 5 (range 4-10) days; urethral: median 4 (range 2\u201311) days). Urinary sepsis occurred in three patients in each group. Urethral catheters caused pain in significantly more patients (urethral 13; suprapubic two; \u03c72 = 8\u00b16, 1 d.f. P&amp;lt;0\u00b101), on more days (suprapubic: 6 of 142 catheter days; urethral: 37 of 126 catheter days; \u03c72 = 29\u00b15, 1 d.f. P&amp;lt;0\u00b1001). Two men with urethral catheters and one with a suprapubic catheter failed to void urethrally when required to do so. Suprapubic catheterization is the method of choice for urinary drainage when this is required in abdominal surgery.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800821024","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,3,3]],"date-time":"2007-03-03T21:17:34Z","timestamp":1172956654000},"page":"1367-1368","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":55,"title":["Optimum method for urinary drainage in major abdominal surgery: A prospective randomized trial of suprapubic <i>versus<\/i> urethral catheterization"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"82","author":[{"given":"T J","family":"O'Kelly","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Raigmore Hospital , Inverness,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A","family":"Mathew","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Raigmore Hospital , Inverness,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S","family":"Ross","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General Practice, Glasgow University , Glasgow,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A","family":"Munro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Raigmore Hospital , Inverness,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1995,10,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024092815091875900_bib1","first-page":"6","volume-title":"Statistics in Practice","author":"Altman","year":"1993"},{"key":"2024092815091875900_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"624","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800740731","article-title":"Prospective randomized controlled trial of urethral versus suprapubic catheterization","volume":"74","author":"Sethia","year":"1987","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2024092815091875900_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1127","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(74)90884-8","article-title":"Measurement of pain","volume":"ii","author":"Huskisson","year":"1974","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2024092815091875900_bib4","first-page":"194","article-title":"Prospective randomised trial of two devices for suprapubic catheterisation in general surgical patients","volume":"76","author":"Carty","year":"1994","journal-title":"Ann R Coll Surg Engl"},{"key":"2024092815091875900_bib5","first-page":"366","article-title":"Acute urinary retention: which catheter?","volume":"70","author":"Allardice","year":"1988","journal-title":"Ann R Coll Surg Engl"}],"container-title":["Journal of British Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fbjs.1800821024","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article-pdf\/82\/10\/1367\/59412328\/bjs1800821024.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article-pdf\/82\/10\/1367\/59412328\/bjs1800821024.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,28]],"date-time":"2024-09-28T15:09:26Z","timestamp":1727536166000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article\/82\/10\/1367\/6167472"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1995,10,1]]},"references-count":5,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1995,10,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1995,10,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bjs.1800821024","relation":{},"ISSN":["0007-1323","1365-2168"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0007-1323"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1365-2168"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[1995,10]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[1995,10,1]]}}}