{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]],"date-time":"2026-10-05T10:17:15Z","timestamp":1791195435635,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2004,6,22]],"date-time":"2004-06-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1087862400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/journals\/pages\/open_access\/funder_policies\/chorus\/standard_publication_model"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2004,8,20]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n \n Background<\/jats:title>\n The introduction of new laparoscopic techniques has important cost implications. The aim of this study was to compare the cost effectiveness of laparoscopic rectopexy with that of open abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n A cost effectiveness study was conducted alongside a randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n The efficacy trial demonstrated significant subjective and objective differences in favour of the laparoscopic technique. The mean operating time was 51 min longer for laparoscopic rectopexy than for the open procedure. Laparoscopic disposables incurred a mean cost of \u00a3291 per patient. The mean duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter for the laparoscopic group (P = 0\u00b7001). Laparoscopic rectopexy was associated with an overall mean cost saving of \u00a3357 (95 per cent confidence interval \u00a3164 to \u00a3592; P = 0\u00b7042) per patient.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n Laparoscopic rectopexy is associated with superior clinical outcomes and is cheaper than the open approach.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.4643","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2004,6,22]],"date-time":"2004-06-22T15:01:07Z","timestamp":1087916467000},"page":"1188-1191","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":57,"title":["Economic impact of laparoscopic versus<\/i> open abdominal rectopexy"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"91","author":[{"given":"G","family":"Salkeld","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M","family":"Bagia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M","family":"Solomon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2004,6,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"2021070911534746400_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"427","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1445-2197.2003.t01-1-02648.x","article-title":"An economic perspective on evidence-based patient choice in surgery","volume":"73","author":"Salkeld","year":"2003","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Surg"},{"key":"2021070911534746400_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1079","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(99)02381-8","article-title":"In pursuit of quality: the National Institute for Clinical Excellence","volume":"353","author":"Rawlins","year":"1999","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2021070911534746400_bib3","first-page":"115","volume-title":"In Economics and Australian Health Policy","author":"Salkeld","year":"1999"},{"key":"2021070911534746400_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0007-1323.2001.01957.x","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse","volume":"89","author":"Solomon","year":"2002","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2021070911534746400_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1077","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(01)06185-2","article-title":"Economics of surgery","volume":"358","author":"Brazier","year":"2001","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2021070911534746400_bib6","first-page":"52","volume-title":"In Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programs","author":"Drummond","year":"1997","edition":"2nd"},{"key":"2021070911534746400_bib7","author":"Commonwealth of Australia","year":"1998","journal-title":"AN-DRG V 4.1. Department of Health and Ageing"},{"key":"2021070911534746400_bib8","author":"Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development","year":"2002","journal-title":"Purchasing Power Parities"},{"key":"2021070911534746400_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1016\/S1072-7515(00)00352-5","article-title":"Length of stay has minimal impact on the cost of hospital admission","volume":"191","author":"Taheri","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"2021070911534746400_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02049468","article-title":"Laparoscopic rectopexy using mesh fixation with a spiked chromium staple","volume":"39","author":"Solomon","year":"1996","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"2021070911534746400_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"759","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-200212000-00008","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome","volume":"236","author":"Braga","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2021070911534746400_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1070","DOI":"10.1007\/s10350-004-6362-2","article-title":"Metabolic and functional results after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized, controlled trial","volume":"45","author":"Braga","year":"2002","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"2021070911534746400_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1007\/s10350-004-6225-x","article-title":"Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences","volume":"45","author":"Senagore","year":"2002","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"2021070911534746400_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1440-1622.1999.01441.x","article-title":"Decreasing lengths of stay: the cost to the community","volume":"69","author":"Caplan","year":"1999","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Surg"}],"container-title":["British Journal of Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fbjs.4643","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article-pdf\/91\/9\/1188\/36730009\/bjs4643.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article-pdf\/91\/9\/1188\/36730009\/bjs4643.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,9]],"date-time":"2021-07-09T21:20:30Z","timestamp":1625865630000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article\/91\/9\/1188\/6143760"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2004,6,22]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2004,6,22]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2004,8,20]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bjs.4643","relation":{},"ISSN":["0007-1323","1365-2168"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0007-1323","type":"print"},{"value":"1365-2168","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2004,9]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2004,6,22]]}}}