{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,17]],"date-time":"2026-10-17T22:16:59Z","timestamp":1792275419088,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,24]],"date-time":"2012-02-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1330041600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/journals\/pages\/open_access\/funder_policies\/chorus\/standard_publication_model"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,4,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Skin incisions have traditionally been made using a scalpel. Cutting diathermy, a more recent alternative, is thought to increase the risk of infection, impair healing and decrease cosmesis. Recent studies suggest otherwise, claiming that diathermy may offer potential advantages with respect to blood loss, incision time and postoperative pain. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare skin incisions made by either scalpel or cutting diathermy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A systematic literature search and review was performed for studies published from January 1980 until June 2011. Randomized clinical trials comparing scalpel and cutting diathermy for skin incisions of any operation were included. Primary outcomes included wound complication rate, blood loss, incision times and pain scores.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Fourteen randomized trials met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis, providing outcome data for a total of 2541 patients (1267 undergoing skin incision by cutting diathermy and 1274 by scalpel). The median length of follow-up across all studies was 6 weeks (range 4 days to 19 months). Compared with a scalpel incision, cutting diathermy resulted in significantly less blood loss (mean difference 0\u00b772 ml\/cm2; P &amp;lt; 0\u00b7001) and shorter incision times (mean difference 36 s; P &amp;lt; 0\u00b7001), with no differences in the wound complication rate (odds ratio 0\u00b787; P = 0\u00b729) or pain score at 24 h (mean difference 0\u00b789; P = 0\u00b705).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Skin incisions made by cutting diathermy are quicker and associated with less blood loss than those made by scalpel, and there are no differences in the rate of wound complications or postoperative pain.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.8708","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,24]],"date-time":"2012-02-24T07:49:57Z","timestamp":1330069797000},"page":"613-620","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":47,"title":["Systematic review and meta-analysis of cutting diathermy\n                    <i>versus<\/i>\n                    scalpel for skin incision"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"99","author":[{"given":"J","family":"Ly","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A","family":"Mittal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J","family":"Windsor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2005.11.017","article-title":"Electrosurgery: history, principles, and current and future uses","volume":"202","author":"Massarweh","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"682","DOI":"10.1080\/00015458.2007.11680146","article-title":"The right method for midline laparotomy: what is the best choice for wound healing?","volume":"107","author":"Ozg\u00fcn","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Chir Belg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"620","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9610(91)90122-T","article-title":"Effects of electrocautery on midline laparotomy wound infection","volume":"162","author":"Kumagai","year":"1991","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(05)80757-3","article-title":"Effect of electrocautery on wound healing in midline laparotomy incisions","volume":"160","author":"Rappaport","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3468(82)80325-4","article-title":"A comparative study of scalpel and electrosurgical incision on subsequent wound healing","volume":"17","author":"Allan","year":"1982","journal-title":"J Pediatr Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3181ff461f","article-title":"Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of surgical scalpel or diathermy in making abdominal skin incisions","volume":"253","author":"Ahmad","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1080\/00015458.2010.11680654","article-title":"Do different abdominal incision techniques play a role in wound complications in patients operated on for gastrointestinal malignancies? \u2018Scalpel vs. electrocautery\u2019","volume":"110","author":"Eren","year":"2010","journal-title":"Acta Chir Belg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib8","first-page":"427","article-title":"Steel scalpel versus electrocautery blade: comparison of cosmetic and patient satisfaction outcomes of different incision methods","volume":"38","author":"Chau","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib9","first-page":"44","article-title":"Prospective randomized control trial comparing the efficacy of diathermy incision versus scalpel incision over skin in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair","volume":"2","author":"Shivagouda","year":"2010","journal-title":"Rec Res Sci Tech"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.29309\/TPMJ\/2011.18.01.1869","article-title":"Elective midline laparotomy: comparison of diathermy and scalpel incisions","volume":"18","author":"Siraj","year":"2011","journal-title":"Professional Med J"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement","volume":"151","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(95)00134-4","article-title":"Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?","volume":"17","author":"Jadad","year":"1996","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1018","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.1991.01410320108015","article-title":"A prospective study of incisional time, blood loss, pain, and healing with carbon dioxide laser, scalpel, and electrosurgery","volume":"126","author":"Pearlman","year":"1991","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1594","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-009-0064-9","article-title":"Diathermy vs. scalpel skin incisions in general surgery: double-blind, randomized, clinical trial","volume":"33","author":"Shamim","year":"2009","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9610(94)90106-6","article-title":"Electrocautery used to create incisions does not increase wound infection rates","volume":"167","author":"Groot","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-5-13","article-title":"Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample","volume":"5","author":"Hozo","year":"2005","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1179","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800751211","article-title":"Incisions with knife or diathermy and postoperative pain","volume":"75","author":"Hussain","year":"1988","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib18","first-page":"299","article-title":"Electrosurgical skin incision versus conventional scalpel: a prospective trial","volume":"35","author":"Dixon","year":"1990","journal-title":"J R Coll Surg Edinb"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"626","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800770610","article-title":"Wound infection after abdominal incision with scalpel or diathermy","volume":"77","author":"Johnson","year":"1990","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800800238","article-title":"Comparative study of abdominal incision techniques","volume":"80","author":"Telfer","year":"1993","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1155\/S1064744993000079","article-title":"Abdominal wound problems after hysterectomy with electrocautery versus scalpel subcutaneous incision","volume":"1","author":"Hemsell","year":"1993","journal-title":"Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2168.2001.01625.x","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy","volume":"88","author":"Kearns","year":"2001","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-007-0205-5","article-title":"Diathermy versus scalpel incisions for hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture: a randomised prospective trial","volume":"17","author":"Byrne","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"867","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aorn.2009.07.025","article-title":"Reducing scalpel injuries in the operating room","volume":"90","author":"Vose","year":"2009","journal-title":"AORN J"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1849","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e3181bcee87","article-title":"Comparative healing of surgical incisions created by the PEAK PlasmaBlade, conventional electrosurgery, and a scalpel","volume":"124","author":"Loh","year":"2009","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"635","DOI":"10.1097\/00000637-200212000-00014","article-title":"Comparative healing of surgical incisions created by a standard \u2018bovie,\u2019 the Utah Medical Epitome Electrode, and a Bard-Parker cold scalpel blade in a porcine model: a pilot study","volume":"49","author":"Vore","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1177\/000313480507100410","article-title":"A prospective study comparing diathermy and scalpel incisions in tension-free inguinal hernioplasty","volume":"71","author":"Chrysos","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(00)00561-4","article-title":"A multicentre collaborative study on the use of cold scalpel and electrocautery for midline abdominal incision","volume":"181","author":"Franchi","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib29","first-page":"371","article-title":"Comparison of superficial surgical site infection following use of diathermy and scalpel for making skin incision in inguinal hernioplasty","volume":"12","author":"Ali","year":"2009","journal-title":"Niger J Clin Pract"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"424","DOI":"10.1177\/175045890901901202","article-title":"Diathermy smoke plume: why do we put up with it?","volume":"19","author":"Rimmer","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Perioper Pract"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1001\/archfacial.2009.104","article-title":"Bipolar electrocautery: a rodent model of Sunderland third-degree nerve injury","volume":"12","author":"Moradzadeh","year":"2010","journal-title":"Arch Facial Plast Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1827","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-010-1474-3","article-title":"Electrocautery causes more ischaemic peritoneal tissue damage than ultrasonic dissection","volume":"25","author":"ten Broek","year":"2011","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"428","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.6901","article-title":"Comparison of lateral thermal spread using monopolar and bipolar diathermy, the Harmonic Scalpel and the ligasure","volume":"97","author":"Sutton","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib34","first-page":"13","article-title":"Comparison of CO2 laser, electrocautery, and scalpel incisions on acute-phase reactants in rat skin","volume":"63","author":"Johnson","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am Surg"},{"key":"2021031605233561400_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.4103\/0019-509X.82904","article-title":"A comparative study of scalpel and surgical diathermy incision in elective operations of head and neck cancer","volume":"48","author":"Kumar","year":"2011","journal-title":"Indian J Cancer"}],"container-title":["British Journal of Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fbjs.8708","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article-pdf\/99\/5\/613\/36607783\/bjs8708.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article-pdf\/99\/5\/613\/36607783\/bjs8708.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,30]],"date-time":"2021-12-30T15:53:38Z","timestamp":1640879618000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article\/99\/5\/613-620\/6141016"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,24]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,24]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,4,4]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bjs.8708","relation":{},"ISSN":["0007-1323","1365-2168"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0007-1323","type":"print"},{"value":"1365-2168","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2012,5]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,24]]}}}