{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,25]],"date-time":"2026-06-25T12:51:26Z","timestamp":1782391886261,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,10]],"date-time":"2018-10-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1539129600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":39,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Behavioral Sci &amp; The Law"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The assessment of an offender's risk of recidivism is emerging as a key consideration in sentencing policy in many US jurisdictions. However, little information is available on how actual sentencing judges view this development. This study surveys the views of a population sample of judges in Virginia, the state that has gone further than any other in legislatively mandating risk assessment for certain drug and property offenders. Results indicate that a strong majority of judges endorse the principle that sentencing eligible offenders should include a consideration of recidivism risk. However, a strong majority also report the availability of alternatives to imprisonment in their jurisdictions to be inadequate at best. Finally, most judges oppose the adoption of a policy requiring them to provide a written reason for declining to impose alternative interventions on \u201clow\u2010risk\u201d offenders.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/bsl.2380","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,11]],"date-time":"2018-10-11T02:45:23Z","timestamp":1539225923000},"page":"565-575","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Judicial appraisals of risk assessment in sentencing"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"John","family":"Monahan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law  Charlottesville VA USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anne L.","family":"Metz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law  Charlottesville VA USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Brandon L.","family":"Garrett","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law  Charlottesville VA USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","volume-title":"Model Penal Code: Sentencing","author":"American Law Institute","year":"2017"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","first-page":"127","volume-title":"Using social science to reduce violent offending","author":"Andrews D. A.","year":"2012"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","unstructured":"Council of State Governments(2018).Ringing in 2018: Justice reinvestment and public safety in the States. Retrieved fromhttps:\/\/csgjusticecenter.org\/jr\/rhode\u2010island\/posts\/ringing\u2010in\u20102018\u2010justice\u2010reinvestment\u2010and\u2010public\u2010safety\u2010in\u2010the\u2010states\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"DeMichele M. Baumgartner P. Barrick K. Comfort M. Scaggs S. &Misra S.(2018).What do criminal justice professionals think about risk assessment at pretrial?Retrieved fromhttps:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3168490","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3168490"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","unstructured":"Elek J. K. Warren R. K. &Casey P. M.(2015).Using risk and needs assessment information at sentencing: Observations from ten jurisdictions. Retrieved fromhttp:\/\/www.ncsc.org\/~\/media\/Microsites\/Files\/CSI\/RNA%202015\/Final%20PEW%20Report%20updated%2010\u20105\u201015.ashx"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1525\/fsr.2013.25.3.168"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","volume-title":"Just sentencing: Principles and procedures for a workable system","author":"Frase R.","year":"2013"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1740-1461.2010.01181.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","unstructured":"Garrett B. Jakubow A. &Monahan J.(2018).\u2009Nonviolent risk assessment in Virginia sentencing: The Sentencing Commission data. Retrieved fromhttp:\/\/www.vcsc.virginia.gov\/2018meetings\/UVA%20Law%20School%20\u2010%20NVRA%20Sentencing%20Analysis%20and%20Judicial%20Survey%20(Mar%201%202018).pdf"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","volume-title":"The mathematics of risk classification: Changing data into valid instruments for juvenile courts","author":"Gottfredson D.","year":"2005"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0093854817719482"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","first-page":"127","article-title":"Risk assessment in evidence\u2010based sentencing: Context and promising uses","volume":"1","author":"Heilbrun K.","year":"2009","journal-title":"Chapman Journal of Criminal Justice"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1525\/fsr.2011.23.4.266"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","volume-title":"The use of risk assessment at sentencing: Implications for research and policy","author":"Hyatt J.","year":"2016"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1525\/fsr.2004.16.3.165"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0011128706294442"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/11281-000"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1525\/fsr.2014.26.3.158"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-clinpsy-021815-092945"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","volume-title":"The future of imprisonment","author":"Morris N.","year":"1974"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_1","first-page":"467","volume-title":"Crime and public policy","author":"Reitz K.","year":"2011"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_23_1","first-page":"165","article-title":"Plata v. Brown and realignment: Jails, prisons, courts, and politics","volume":"48","author":"Schlanger M.","year":"2013","journal-title":"Harvard Civil Rights\u2010Civil Liberties Law Review"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/009385402236732"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.120006"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_26_1","first-page":"1127","article-title":"Prevention as the primary goal of sentencing: The modern case for indeterminate dispositions in criminal cases","volume":"48","author":"Slobogin C.","year":"2011","journal-title":"San Diego Law Review"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_27_1","first-page":"803","article-title":"Evidence\u2010based sentencing and the scientific rationalization of discrimination","volume":"66","author":"Starr S.","year":"2014","journal-title":"Stanford Law Review"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1525\/fsr.2014.26.3.167"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_29_1","volume-title":"The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences","author":"Travis J.","year":"2014"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_30_1","unstructured":"U.S. Sentencing Commission(2015).Results of 2014 survey of United States district judges: Modification and revocation of probation and supervised release. Retrieved fromhttp:\/\/www.ussc.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/pdf\/research\u2010and\u2010publications\/research\u2010projects\u2010and\u2010surveys\/surveys\/20150225_Judges_Survey.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_31_1","unstructured":"Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission(2012).\u20092012 Annual Report. Retrieved fromhttp:\/\/www.vcsc.virginia.gov\/2012VCSCAnnualReport.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_32_1","unstructured":"Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission(2017).\u20092017 Annual Report. Retrieved fromhttp:\/\/www.vcsc.virginia.gov\/2017AnnualReport.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_33_1","volume-title":"Doing justice: The choice of punishments","author":"Hirsch A.","year":"1976"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_34_1","volume-title":"The city that became safe: New York's lessons for urban crime and its control","author":"Zimring F.","year":"2012"}],"container-title":["Behavioral Sciences &amp; the Law"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fbsl.2380","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/bsl.2380","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,12]],"date-time":"2023-09-12T17:26:41Z","timestamp":1694539601000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/bsl.2380"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/bsl.2380"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bsl.2380","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0735-3936","1099-0798"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0735-3936","type":"print"},{"value":"1099-0798","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2018-03-27","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-05-01","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-10-10","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}