{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T14:50:50Z","timestamp":1790175050162,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":48,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,19]],"date-time":"2010-11-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1290124800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":4,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Cathet Cardio Intervent"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,15]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:styled-content>Objectives:<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    To examine the prevalence of radiation\u2010associated lens opacities among interventional cardiologists and nurses and correlate with occupational radiation exposure.\n                    <jats:styled-content>Background:<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    Interventional cardiology personnel are exposed to relatively high levels of X\u2010rays and based on recent findings of radiation\u2010associated lens opacities in other cohorts, they may be at risk for cataract without use of ocular radiation protection.\n                    <jats:styled-content>Methods:<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    Eyes of interventional cardiologists, nurses, and age\u2010 and sex\u2010matched unexposed controls were screened by dilated slit lamp examination and posterior lens changes graded using a modified Merriam\u2010Focht technique. Individual cumulative lens X\u2010ray exposure was calculated from responses to a questionnaire and personal interview.\n                    <jats:styled-content>Results:<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    The prevalence of radiation\u2010associated posterior lens opacities was 52% (29\/56, 95% CI: 35\u201373) for interventional cardiologists, 45% (5\/11, 95% CI: 15\u2013100) for nurses, and 9% (2\/22, 95% CI: 1\u201333) for controls. Relative risks of lens opacity was 5.7 (95% CI: 1.5\u201322) for interventional cardiologists and 5.0 (95% CI: 1.2\u201321) for nurses. Estimated cumulative ocular doses ranged from 0.01 to 43 Gy with mean and median values of 3.4 and 1.0 Gy, respectively. A strong dose\u2013response relationship was found between occupational exposure and the prevalence of radiation\u2010associated posterior lens changes.\n                    <jats:styled-content>Conclusions:<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    These findings demonstrate a dose dependent increased risk of posterior lens opacities for interventional cardiologists and nurses when radiation protection tools are not used. While study of a larger cohort is needed to confirm these findings, the results suggest ocular radio\u2010protection should be utilized. \u00a9 2010 Wiley\u2010Liss, Inc.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.22670","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,6,14]],"date-time":"2010-06-14T12:57:57Z","timestamp":1276520277000},"page":"826-834","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":250,"title":["Risk for radiation\u2010induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: Is there reason for concern?"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"76","author":[{"given":"Olivera","family":"Ciraj\u2010Bjelac","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Madan M.","family":"Rehani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kui Hian","family":"Sim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Houng Bang","family":"Liew","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eliseo","family":"Vano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Norman J.","family":"Kleiman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijcard.2005.06.015"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2502082558"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1522-726X(199906)47:2<229::AID-CCD23>3.0.CO;2-W"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.20201"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/76128583"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0146-6453(01)00035-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2482071800"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.81.4.257"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_2","first-page":"81","volume-title":"Radiation Protection; New insights in radiation risk and basic safety standards","author":"Kleiman NJ","year":"2007"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_2","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Duane's Clinical Ophthalmology","author":"Kleiman NJ","year":"1994"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.eye.6701964"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_2","first-page":"372","article-title":"Experimental radiation cataract\u2014Its clinical relevance","volume":"59","author":"Merriam GR","year":"1983","journal-title":"Bull NY Acad Sci"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/3577813"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/3580093"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.81.4.261"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1667\/0033-7587(2001)156[0460:SRACIA]2.0.CO;2"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-002-0489-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1667\/RR1850.1"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1667\/RR0298.1"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.71.847.9771383"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_2","first-page":"5","article-title":"Interventional radiology carries occupational risk for cataracts","volume":"14","year":"2004","journal-title":"RSNA News"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwn171"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1667\/RR1688.1"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1667\/RRXX19.1"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.HP.0000175442.03596.63"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1667\/RR0928.1"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_28_2","first-page":"388","article-title":"Cataract in interventional radiology\u2014An occupational hazard?","volume":"45","author":"Junk AK","year":"2004","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (Suppl)"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.1810300403"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.71.849.10195011"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/26829723"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/15413265"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1667\/RR2207.1"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_34_2","first-page":"35","article-title":"A clinical and experimental study of the effect of single and divided doses of radiation on cataract production","volume":"60","author":"Merriam GR","year":"1962","journal-title":"Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.icrp.2008.07.001"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncq039"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.20451"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.71.846.9849387"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/26551424"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1201\/NOE0750305136"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ajcn\/69.2.237"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.320.7247.1468"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_43_2","unstructured":"PadovaniR Le HeronJ CzarwinskiR DuranA MillerDL RehaniMM SimKH VanoE LefaureC Cruz\u2010SuarezR.International project on individual monitoring and radiation exposure levels in interventional cardiology. Proceedings of European Conference on Individual Monitoring of Ionizing Radiation March 8\u201312 Athens Greece 2010. p175(abstract)."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_44_2","volume-title":"Use of Personal Monitors to Estimate Effective Dose Equivalent and Effective Dose to Workers for External Exposure to Low\u2010LET Radiation. NCRP Report No. 122","author":"National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements","year":"1995"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_45_2","first-page":"832","article-title":"A positive and a negative bystander effect influences cataract outcome in the irradiated lens","volume":"46","author":"Worgul BV","year":"2005","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2007.11.024"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.122.4.487","article-title":"Prevalence of cataract and pseudophakia\/aphakia among adults in the United States","volume":"122","author":"The Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group","year":"2004","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s004110050022"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_49_2","unstructured":"International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Radiation protection of patients (RPOP). Available at:http:\/\/rpop.iaea.org\/RPOP\/RPoP\/Content\/AdditionalResources\/Training\/index.htm."}],"container-title":["Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fccd.22670","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ccd.22670","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,21]],"date-time":"2023-11-21T02:29:33Z","timestamp":1700533773000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/ccd.22670"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,15]]},"references-count":48,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,15]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/ccd.22670"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ccd.22670","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1522-1946","1522-726X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1522-1946","type":"print"},{"value":"1522-726X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,15]]}}}